中国民营科技园区竞争力评价的综合评价模型

Zhuoran Li, Yuming Zhu, Xiaohai Weng, Qingye Han, F. Lyu
{"title":"中国民营科技园区竞争力评价的综合评价模型","authors":"Zhuoran Li, Yuming Zhu, Xiaohai Weng, Qingye Han, F. Lyu","doi":"10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9672778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper established a combined evaluation model to assess the competitiveness of Private Science and Technology Parks (PSTPs) in China to support their scientific development. More specifically, the evaluation index system is identified according to the previous study. Three commonly used methods, including Grey Relational Analysis (GRA), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are utilized to obtain each evaluation result. Considering the inconsistency of the above results, this paper conducted a combined evaluation method to gain a more scientific and reasonable result. Finally, a numerical example was taken to show the effectiveness of the proposed model.","PeriodicalId":6818,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"51 1","pages":"513-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Combined Evaluation Model for Competitiveness Assessment of Private Science and Technology Parks in China\",\"authors\":\"Zhuoran Li, Yuming Zhu, Xiaohai Weng, Qingye Han, F. Lyu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9672778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper established a combined evaluation model to assess the competitiveness of Private Science and Technology Parks (PSTPs) in China to support their scientific development. More specifically, the evaluation index system is identified according to the previous study. Three commonly used methods, including Grey Relational Analysis (GRA), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are utilized to obtain each evaluation result. Considering the inconsistency of the above results, this paper conducted a combined evaluation method to gain a more scientific and reasonable result. Finally, a numerical example was taken to show the effectiveness of the proposed model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"513-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9672778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM50564.2021.9672778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文建立了中国民营科技园区竞争力的综合评价模型,以支持民营科技园区的科学发展。更具体地说,根据前面的研究确定了评价指标体系。利用灰色关联分析法(GRA)、TOPSIS法(Order Preference Technique of Similarity to Ideal Solution)和主成分分析法(PCA)三种常用的评价方法得到评价结果。考虑到上述结果的不一致性,本文采用了综合评价方法,以获得更科学合理的评价结果。最后,通过数值算例验证了该模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Combined Evaluation Model for Competitiveness Assessment of Private Science and Technology Parks in China
This paper established a combined evaluation model to assess the competitiveness of Private Science and Technology Parks (PSTPs) in China to support their scientific development. More specifically, the evaluation index system is identified according to the previous study. Three commonly used methods, including Grey Relational Analysis (GRA), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), are utilized to obtain each evaluation result. Considering the inconsistency of the above results, this paper conducted a combined evaluation method to gain a more scientific and reasonable result. Finally, a numerical example was taken to show the effectiveness of the proposed model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信