战略弹性:主要文献的系统回顾

Tim Colberg
{"title":"战略弹性:主要文献的系统回顾","authors":"Tim Colberg","doi":"10.32025/jbm22004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Topicality: The concepts of resilience, organizational resilience, and strategic resilience in management science have been gaining more and more attention in recent years. Strategic resilience, in general, can be understood as the capability to turn threats into opportunities. The overarching concept of organizational resilience describes the capability to respond to changes or adversity; however, the concept of strategic resilience is still underrepresented in research and not clearly distinguished within organizational resilience. The research aim: This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to develop a shared understanding of the concept of strategic resilience in business and management research. Furthermore, a future research agenda is provided from these findings. Methodology: The review examines the leading publications with the search term ‘strategic resilience’ in the ScienceDirect and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) databases with a Boolean search. In total, 73 publications across 45 publication sources from 1979 to 2021 are used. Findings: Research on the resilience of companies and systems seems to trend upwards. Publications are concentrated primarily in journals with an environmental or sustainable background. The publications view resilience in terms of the cause of resilience, fields where resilience is applied, or the concept of resilience and strategic management itself. Novelty: Analyzing the existing research shows that strategic resilience can prepare a response to unforeseeable challenges or opportunities in a company by pursuing an ambidextrous organization that exploits operational resilience and explores strategic resilience to build organizational resilience. Keywords: resilience, strategic resilience, organizational resilience, uncertainty, organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities. Paper classification: literature review","PeriodicalId":7666,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Business Management","volume":"74 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STRATEGIC RESILIENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LEADING LITERATURE\",\"authors\":\"Tim Colberg\",\"doi\":\"10.32025/jbm22004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Topicality: The concepts of resilience, organizational resilience, and strategic resilience in management science have been gaining more and more attention in recent years. Strategic resilience, in general, can be understood as the capability to turn threats into opportunities. The overarching concept of organizational resilience describes the capability to respond to changes or adversity; however, the concept of strategic resilience is still underrepresented in research and not clearly distinguished within organizational resilience. The research aim: This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to develop a shared understanding of the concept of strategic resilience in business and management research. Furthermore, a future research agenda is provided from these findings. Methodology: The review examines the leading publications with the search term ‘strategic resilience’ in the ScienceDirect and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) databases with a Boolean search. In total, 73 publications across 45 publication sources from 1979 to 2021 are used. Findings: Research on the resilience of companies and systems seems to trend upwards. Publications are concentrated primarily in journals with an environmental or sustainable background. The publications view resilience in terms of the cause of resilience, fields where resilience is applied, or the concept of resilience and strategic management itself. Novelty: Analyzing the existing research shows that strategic resilience can prepare a response to unforeseeable challenges or opportunities in a company by pursuing an ambidextrous organization that exploits operational resilience and explores strategic resilience to build organizational resilience. Keywords: resilience, strategic resilience, organizational resilience, uncertainty, organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities. Paper classification: literature review\",\"PeriodicalId\":7666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Business Management\",\"volume\":\"74 7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Business Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32025/jbm22004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32025/jbm22004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

话题性:近年来,管理科学中的弹性、组织弹性和战略弹性等概念受到越来越多的关注。一般来说,战略弹性可以理解为将威胁转化为机会的能力。组织弹性的总体概念描述了应对变化或逆境的能力;然而,战略弹性的概念在研究中仍然被低估,在组织弹性中也没有明确的区分。研究目的:本文旨在进行系统的文献综述,以形成对商业和管理研究中战略弹性概念的共同理解。此外,根据这些发现提供了未来的研究议程。方法:本文通过布尔搜索,在ScienceDirect和电气与电子工程师协会(IEEE)数据库中以“战略弹性”为搜索词,对主要出版物进行了研究。总共使用了1979年至2021年45个出版物来源的73种出版物。研究发现:对公司和系统弹性的研究似乎呈上升趋势。出版物主要集中在具有环境或可持续背景的期刊上。出版物从弹性的原因、应用弹性的领域或弹性的概念和战略管理本身的角度来看待弹性。新颖性:分析现有研究表明,战略弹性可以通过追求一个利用运营弹性和探索战略弹性来构建组织弹性的双灵巧组织来准备应对公司不可预见的挑战或机遇。关键词:弹性,战略弹性,组织弹性,不确定性,组织双元性,动态能力。论文分类:文献综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STRATEGIC RESILIENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LEADING LITERATURE
Topicality: The concepts of resilience, organizational resilience, and strategic resilience in management science have been gaining more and more attention in recent years. Strategic resilience, in general, can be understood as the capability to turn threats into opportunities. The overarching concept of organizational resilience describes the capability to respond to changes or adversity; however, the concept of strategic resilience is still underrepresented in research and not clearly distinguished within organizational resilience. The research aim: This paper aims to conduct a systematic literature review to develop a shared understanding of the concept of strategic resilience in business and management research. Furthermore, a future research agenda is provided from these findings. Methodology: The review examines the leading publications with the search term ‘strategic resilience’ in the ScienceDirect and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) databases with a Boolean search. In total, 73 publications across 45 publication sources from 1979 to 2021 are used. Findings: Research on the resilience of companies and systems seems to trend upwards. Publications are concentrated primarily in journals with an environmental or sustainable background. The publications view resilience in terms of the cause of resilience, fields where resilience is applied, or the concept of resilience and strategic management itself. Novelty: Analyzing the existing research shows that strategic resilience can prepare a response to unforeseeable challenges or opportunities in a company by pursuing an ambidextrous organization that exploits operational resilience and explores strategic resilience to build organizational resilience. Keywords: resilience, strategic resilience, organizational resilience, uncertainty, organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities. Paper classification: literature review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信