定位Twitter话语与口语和书面文本的关系

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
A. Bohmann
{"title":"定位Twitter话语与口语和书面文本的关系","authors":"A. Bohmann","doi":"10.25162/zdl-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language use on Twitter is a recent and currently understudied phenomenon. The present study makes an empirical contribution towards understanding the similarities and differences between Twitter and offline registers. To this purpose, a lectometric analysis is conducted: on the basis of 236 linguistic features whose frequency information is measured in 7 309 spoken, written and Twitter texts, 10 dimensions of linguistic variation are developed. Within the space of variation circumscribed by these dimensions, Twitter is characterized not so much by radical difference as by gradual differentiation from other registers. The only dimension along which a clear distinction between Twitter and other registers can be seen is that of “colloquial markedness”. In general, language on Twitter can be described as involved and consciously informal, but not very much oriented towards either addressees or factual statements.","PeriodicalId":42450,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situating Twitter Discourse in Relation to Spoken and Written Texts\",\"authors\":\"A. Bohmann\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/zdl-2020-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Language use on Twitter is a recent and currently understudied phenomenon. The present study makes an empirical contribution towards understanding the similarities and differences between Twitter and offline registers. To this purpose, a lectometric analysis is conducted: on the basis of 236 linguistic features whose frequency information is measured in 7 309 spoken, written and Twitter texts, 10 dimensions of linguistic variation are developed. Within the space of variation circumscribed by these dimensions, Twitter is characterized not so much by radical difference as by gradual differentiation from other registers. The only dimension along which a clear distinction between Twitter and other registers can be seen is that of “colloquial markedness”. In general, language on Twitter can be described as involved and consciously informal, but not very much oriented towards either addressees or factual statements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2020-0009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Dialektologie Und Linguistik","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/zdl-2020-0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Twitter上的语言使用是最近才出现的现象,目前还没有得到充分的研究。本研究为理解Twitter和离线注册表之间的异同做出了实证贡献。为此,进行了一项电析分析:在测量了7309个口头、书面和Twitter文本的236个语言特征的频率信息的基础上,开发了语言变化的10个维度。在这些维度限定的变化空间内,Twitter的特点与其说是激进的差异,不如说是与其他寄存器的逐渐分化。Twitter与其他语域之间唯一可以明显区分的维度是“口语标记”。总的来说,Twitter上的语言可以被描述为涉及和有意识的非正式,但不是非常面向收件人或事实陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Situating Twitter Discourse in Relation to Spoken and Written Texts
Language use on Twitter is a recent and currently understudied phenomenon. The present study makes an empirical contribution towards understanding the similarities and differences between Twitter and offline registers. To this purpose, a lectometric analysis is conducted: on the basis of 236 linguistic features whose frequency information is measured in 7 309 spoken, written and Twitter texts, 10 dimensions of linguistic variation are developed. Within the space of variation circumscribed by these dimensions, Twitter is characterized not so much by radical difference as by gradual differentiation from other registers. The only dimension along which a clear distinction between Twitter and other registers can be seen is that of “colloquial markedness”. In general, language on Twitter can be described as involved and consciously informal, but not very much oriented towards either addressees or factual statements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Aufsätze, Diskussionsbeiträge, Berichte, Rezensionen und Besprechungsexemplare werden nur an die Adresse der Redaktion erbeten. Für unaufgefordert eingesandte Rezensionsexemplare kann die Gewähr einer Besprechung nicht übernommen werden. Das neue Merkblatt für die Einrichtung von Manuskripten kann bei der Redaktion angefordert oder unter Richtlinien für die Erstellung von Beiträgen heruntergeladen werden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信