基于遗传算法和人工神经网络的水驱井控优化

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhammad Gibran Alfarizi , Milan Stanko , Timur Bikmukhametov
{"title":"基于遗传算法和人工神经网络的水驱井控优化","authors":"Muhammad Gibran Alfarizi ,&nbsp;Milan Stanko ,&nbsp;Timur Bikmukhametov","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Optimum well controls to maximize net present value (NPV) in a waterflooding operation are often obtained from an iterative process of employing numerical reservoir simulation and optimization algorithms. It is often challenging to implement gradient-based optimization algorithms because of the large number of variables and the complexities to embed the optimization algorithm in the simulator solving workflow. Approaches based on repeated model evaluation are easier to implement but are often time-consuming and computationally expensive.</p><p>This work proposes the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to replicate the numerical reservoir simulation outputs. The ANN model is used to estimate cumulative oil production, cumulative water injection, and cumulative water production based on sets of well control values, i.e. flowing bottom-hole pressure. Then, the ANN model is combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) optimization (a derivative-free optimization) to find the optimum well controls that maximize the NPV of a synthetic reservoir model. The optimization results of this ANN-GA model were compared against the results of using the traditional approach of applying the genetic algorithm directly on the numerical reservoir model.</p><p>The ANN model successfully reproduces the results of the numerical reservoir model with a low average error of 1.89%. The ANN-GA model successfully finds optimal operational conditions that are identical to those found by using GA and the original reservoir model. However, the running time was lowered by 96% (43 h faster) when compared to the optimization scheme using the original reservoir model. The optimal solution increases the NPV by 22.2% when compared to the base case.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000093/pdfft?md5=c73e1a7d26450e39421eef0bf49ab651&pid=1-s2.0-S2666260422000093-main.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well control optimization in waterflooding using genetic algorithm coupled with Artificial Neural Networks\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Gibran Alfarizi ,&nbsp;Milan Stanko ,&nbsp;Timur Bikmukhametov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Optimum well controls to maximize net present value (NPV) in a waterflooding operation are often obtained from an iterative process of employing numerical reservoir simulation and optimization algorithms. It is often challenging to implement gradient-based optimization algorithms because of the large number of variables and the complexities to embed the optimization algorithm in the simulator solving workflow. Approaches based on repeated model evaluation are easier to implement but are often time-consuming and computationally expensive.</p><p>This work proposes the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to replicate the numerical reservoir simulation outputs. The ANN model is used to estimate cumulative oil production, cumulative water injection, and cumulative water production based on sets of well control values, i.e. flowing bottom-hole pressure. Then, the ANN model is combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) optimization (a derivative-free optimization) to find the optimum well controls that maximize the NPV of a synthetic reservoir model. The optimization results of this ANN-GA model were compared against the results of using the traditional approach of applying the genetic algorithm directly on the numerical reservoir model.</p><p>The ANN model successfully reproduces the results of the numerical reservoir model with a low average error of 1.89%. The ANN-GA model successfully finds optimal operational conditions that are identical to those found by using GA and the original reservoir model. However, the running time was lowered by 96% (43 h faster) when compared to the optimization scheme using the original reservoir model. The optimal solution increases the NPV by 22.2% when compared to the base case.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000093/pdfft?md5=c73e1a7d26450e39421eef0bf49ab651&pid=1-s2.0-S2666260422000093-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在注水作业中,实现净现值(NPV)最大化的最佳井控通常是通过采用数值油藏模拟和优化算法的迭代过程获得的。基于梯度的优化算法的实现往往具有挑战性,因为它包含大量的变量和将优化算法嵌入到模拟器求解工作流程中的复杂性。基于重复模型评估的方法更容易实现,但通常耗时且计算成本高。这项工作提出使用人工神经网络(ANN)来复制数值油藏模拟输出。人工神经网络模型用于根据井控值(即井底流动压力)来估计累计产油量、累计注水量和累计产水量。然后,将人工神经网络模型与遗传算法(GA)优化(一种无导数优化)相结合,找到使合成油藏模型的NPV最大化的最佳井控。将该ANN-GA模型的优化结果与直接应用遗传算法求解油藏数值模型的传统方法进行了比较。人工神经网络模型成功地再现了油藏数值模型的结果,平均误差较低,为1.89%。ANN-GA模型成功地找到了与遗传算法和原始油藏模型相同的最优运行条件。然而,与使用原始油藏模型的优化方案相比,运行时间缩短了96%(缩短了43 h)。与基本情况相比,最优解决方案使NPV增加22.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Well control optimization in waterflooding using genetic algorithm coupled with Artificial Neural Networks

Optimum well controls to maximize net present value (NPV) in a waterflooding operation are often obtained from an iterative process of employing numerical reservoir simulation and optimization algorithms. It is often challenging to implement gradient-based optimization algorithms because of the large number of variables and the complexities to embed the optimization algorithm in the simulator solving workflow. Approaches based on repeated model evaluation are easier to implement but are often time-consuming and computationally expensive.

This work proposes the use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to replicate the numerical reservoir simulation outputs. The ANN model is used to estimate cumulative oil production, cumulative water injection, and cumulative water production based on sets of well control values, i.e. flowing bottom-hole pressure. Then, the ANN model is combined with the genetic algorithm (GA) optimization (a derivative-free optimization) to find the optimum well controls that maximize the NPV of a synthetic reservoir model. The optimization results of this ANN-GA model were compared against the results of using the traditional approach of applying the genetic algorithm directly on the numerical reservoir model.

The ANN model successfully reproduces the results of the numerical reservoir model with a low average error of 1.89%. The ANN-GA model successfully finds optimal operational conditions that are identical to those found by using GA and the original reservoir model. However, the running time was lowered by 96% (43 h faster) when compared to the optimization scheme using the original reservoir model. The optimal solution increases the NPV by 22.2% when compared to the base case.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信