数据所有权和开放科学

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS
M. J. Tonelli, Felipe Zambaldi
{"title":"数据所有权和开放科学","authors":"M. J. Tonelli, Felipe Zambaldi","doi":"10.1590/s0034-759020190601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of providing open access to articles, adopted in Brazil and several other countries, still faces resistance from many commercial publishers abroad (Packer & Santos, 2019a). Recently, some of them have switched to a hybrid model (open and closed access) as a more balanced path. Transparency in the peer review process is also being discussed: The digital library SciELO recommends a “gradual increase of transparency and openness [...] with the disclosure of the identities of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process” (Packer & Santos, 2019b). Even more controversial is the policy of open access to research data of articles published in scientific publications. The Blog SciELO em Perspectiva has several texts discussing this trend, which have been questioned by many actors involved in the production and publication of scientific articles, including authors, universities, editors, and publishers.","PeriodicalId":46558,"journal":{"name":"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas","volume":"102 1","pages":"372-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROPRIEDADE DOS DADOS E CIÊNCIA ABERTA\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Tonelli, Felipe Zambaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0034-759020190601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The practice of providing open access to articles, adopted in Brazil and several other countries, still faces resistance from many commercial publishers abroad (Packer & Santos, 2019a). Recently, some of them have switched to a hybrid model (open and closed access) as a more balanced path. Transparency in the peer review process is also being discussed: The digital library SciELO recommends a “gradual increase of transparency and openness [...] with the disclosure of the identities of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process” (Packer & Santos, 2019b). Even more controversial is the policy of open access to research data of articles published in scientific publications. The Blog SciELO em Perspectiva has several texts discussing this trend, which have been questioned by many actors involved in the production and publication of scientific articles, including authors, universities, editors, and publishers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"372-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190601\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在巴西和其他几个国家采用的开放获取文章的做法仍然面临来自国外许多商业出版商的抵制(Packer & Santos, 2019a)。最近,他们中的一些人已经转向混合模式(开放和封闭访问)作为更平衡的路径。同行评议过程的透明度也在讨论之中:数字图书馆SciELO建议“逐步增加透明度和公开性……在评估过程中披露了作者和审稿人的身份”(Packer & Santos, 2019b)。更有争议的是开放获取发表在科学出版物上的研究数据的政策。博客SciELO em Perspectiva有几篇文章讨论了这一趋势,但许多参与科学文章制作和出版的参与者,包括作者、大学、编辑和出版商,都对这一趋势提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROPRIEDADE DOS DADOS E CIÊNCIA ABERTA
The practice of providing open access to articles, adopted in Brazil and several other countries, still faces resistance from many commercial publishers abroad (Packer & Santos, 2019a). Recently, some of them have switched to a hybrid model (open and closed access) as a more balanced path. Transparency in the peer review process is also being discussed: The digital library SciELO recommends a “gradual increase of transparency and openness [...] with the disclosure of the identities of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process” (Packer & Santos, 2019b). Even more controversial is the policy of open access to research data of articles published in scientific publications. The Blog SciELO em Perspectiva has several texts discussing this trend, which have been questioned by many actors involved in the production and publication of scientific articles, including authors, universities, editors, and publishers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
78
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信