主观幸福感与工作绩效关系的跨文化证据:一项元分析

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
J. Salgado, Silvia Moscoso
{"title":"主观幸福感与工作绩效关系的跨文化证据:一项元分析","authors":"J. Salgado, Silvia Moscoso","doi":"10.5093/jwop2022a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis examined the differences across countries/regions, and the moderator effects of the study type (crosssectional vs. longitudinal) on the SWB-job performance relationship. The database consists of 78 independent samples (N = 18,853), located through electronic and manual searches. The results showed that overall SWB (ρ = .37), cognitive SWB (ρ = .27), and affective SWB (ρ = .37) are predictors of job performance. Evidence of cross-cultural effects showed that the magnitude of the SWB-job performance relationship was larger in the Asia-Pacific region than in Europe and the US-Canada region (Asia-Pacific ρ = .41, Europe ρ = .33, USA ρ = .23). Moderator analyses indicated that, on average, crosssectional (concurrent) and longitudinal (predictive) studies showed similar validity (ρ = .33 vs. ρ = .32). Lastly, we discuss the main contributions, and some practical implications and some limitations of the study are mentioned. Evidencia transcultural de la relación entre el bienestar subjetivo y el desempeño en el trabajo: un metaanálisis","PeriodicalId":46388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology-Revista De Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural Evidence of the Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Salgado, Silvia Moscoso\",\"doi\":\"10.5093/jwop2022a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This meta-analysis examined the differences across countries/regions, and the moderator effects of the study type (crosssectional vs. longitudinal) on the SWB-job performance relationship. The database consists of 78 independent samples (N = 18,853), located through electronic and manual searches. The results showed that overall SWB (ρ = .37), cognitive SWB (ρ = .27), and affective SWB (ρ = .37) are predictors of job performance. Evidence of cross-cultural effects showed that the magnitude of the SWB-job performance relationship was larger in the Asia-Pacific region than in Europe and the US-Canada region (Asia-Pacific ρ = .41, Europe ρ = .33, USA ρ = .23). Moderator analyses indicated that, on average, crosssectional (concurrent) and longitudinal (predictive) studies showed similar validity (ρ = .33 vs. ρ = .32). Lastly, we discuss the main contributions, and some practical implications and some limitations of the study are mentioned. Evidencia transcultural de la relación entre el bienestar subjetivo y el desempeño en el trabajo: un metaanálisis\",\"PeriodicalId\":46388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology-Revista De Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology-Revista De Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology-Revista De Psicologia Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2022a3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本荟萃分析考察了不同国家/地区的差异,以及研究类型(横断面与纵向)对主观幸福感-工作绩效关系的调节作用。该数据库由78个独立样本(N = 18,853)组成,通过电子和人工搜索进行定位。结果显示,整体主观幸福感(ρ = 0.37)、认知主观幸福感(ρ = 0.27)和情感主观幸福感(ρ = 0.37)是工作绩效的预测因子。跨文化效应的证据表明,亚太地区的幸福感与工作绩效关系的大小大于欧洲和美国-加拿大地区(亚太ρ = 0.41,欧洲ρ = 0.33,美国ρ = 0.23)。调节分析表明,平均而言,横断面(并发)和纵向(预测)研究显示相似的效度(ρ = 0.33 vs. ρ = 0.32)。最后,讨论了本研究的主要贡献,并指出了本研究的现实意义和局限性。证据跨文化de la relación entre el bienestar subjtivo y el desempeño en el trabajo: un metaanálisis
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural Evidence of the Relationship between Subjective Well-being and Job Performance: A Meta-analysis
This meta-analysis examined the differences across countries/regions, and the moderator effects of the study type (crosssectional vs. longitudinal) on the SWB-job performance relationship. The database consists of 78 independent samples (N = 18,853), located through electronic and manual searches. The results showed that overall SWB (ρ = .37), cognitive SWB (ρ = .27), and affective SWB (ρ = .37) are predictors of job performance. Evidence of cross-cultural effects showed that the magnitude of the SWB-job performance relationship was larger in the Asia-Pacific region than in Europe and the US-Canada region (Asia-Pacific ρ = .41, Europe ρ = .33, USA ρ = .23). Moderator analyses indicated that, on average, crosssectional (concurrent) and longitudinal (predictive) studies showed similar validity (ρ = .33 vs. ρ = .32). Lastly, we discuss the main contributions, and some practical implications and some limitations of the study are mentioned. Evidencia transcultural de la relación entre el bienestar subjetivo y el desempeño en el trabajo: un metaanálisis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信