一项关于南非用户对自然科学收藏看法的在线调查

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES
Ms Shanelle Ribeiro, Dr Terry Reynolds, Dr Bernhard Zipfel, Mr Mashiane Sonnyboy Mothogoane, Dr Anthony Magee
{"title":"一项关于南非用户对自然科学收藏看法的在线调查","authors":"Ms Shanelle Ribeiro, Dr Terry Reynolds, Dr Bernhard Zipfel, Mr Mashiane Sonnyboy Mothogoane, Dr Anthony Magee","doi":"10.38201/btha.abc.v53.i1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In South Africa, and globally, the value of natural science collections for scientific research is not widely recognised and has led to its marginalisation, which in turn has resulted in low funding, staffing and use of the collections. \nAim & objectives: To this end, as part of the effort to increase understanding and appreciation of the collections, a cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to users of natural science collections (NSCs) in South Africa. The objectives of the study were to identify the perceived value of NSCs to the research community; perceived or experienced barriers in accessing NSCs and associated data for use in research; perceptions of NSCs’ current performance in serving the needs of stakeholders; and how performance is judged and what the expectations are to improve future performance of NSCs to better serve the needs of stakeholders.\nMethods: The survey consisted of 26 questions, distributed by email to relevant researcher community mailing lists, and posted on relevant social media groups. The survey was completed by 131 respondents.\nResults & conclusion: The study indicated the overall perception of the importance of NSCs and their accessibility to the student and researcher community in South Africa and internationally to be extremely important to their research. Lack of funding for operations and staff impedes the ability of researchers and other users alike in using NSCs to optimise their research and contribute to issues of societal concern. A sustained commitment is required from NSC institutions to work together to solve various challenges, including improvement in serving stakeholder needs, which will in turn assist with demonstrating the value of NSCs to policymakers, in order to lobby for support and funding. Improved recognition of the importance of NSCs for research by the scientific community will assist NSCs in demonstrating their impact. Political priority should also be given to the long-term upkeep and ongoing assistance of institutional infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":55336,"journal":{"name":"Bothalia","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An online survey on user perceptions of natural science collections in South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Ms Shanelle Ribeiro, Dr Terry Reynolds, Dr Bernhard Zipfel, Mr Mashiane Sonnyboy Mothogoane, Dr Anthony Magee\",\"doi\":\"10.38201/btha.abc.v53.i1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In South Africa, and globally, the value of natural science collections for scientific research is not widely recognised and has led to its marginalisation, which in turn has resulted in low funding, staffing and use of the collections. \\nAim & objectives: To this end, as part of the effort to increase understanding and appreciation of the collections, a cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to users of natural science collections (NSCs) in South Africa. The objectives of the study were to identify the perceived value of NSCs to the research community; perceived or experienced barriers in accessing NSCs and associated data for use in research; perceptions of NSCs’ current performance in serving the needs of stakeholders; and how performance is judged and what the expectations are to improve future performance of NSCs to better serve the needs of stakeholders.\\nMethods: The survey consisted of 26 questions, distributed by email to relevant researcher community mailing lists, and posted on relevant social media groups. The survey was completed by 131 respondents.\\nResults & conclusion: The study indicated the overall perception of the importance of NSCs and their accessibility to the student and researcher community in South Africa and internationally to be extremely important to their research. Lack of funding for operations and staff impedes the ability of researchers and other users alike in using NSCs to optimise their research and contribute to issues of societal concern. A sustained commitment is required from NSC institutions to work together to solve various challenges, including improvement in serving stakeholder needs, which will in turn assist with demonstrating the value of NSCs to policymakers, in order to lobby for support and funding. Improved recognition of the importance of NSCs for research by the scientific community will assist NSCs in demonstrating their impact. Political priority should also be given to the long-term upkeep and ongoing assistance of institutional infrastructures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bothalia\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bothalia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38201/btha.abc.v53.i1.10\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bothalia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38201/btha.abc.v53.i1.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在南非和全球范围内,自然科学收藏对科学研究的价值没有得到广泛认可,并导致其边缘化,这反过来又导致了收藏的资金、人员配备和使用不足。目的和目标:为此,作为提高对馆藏的理解和欣赏的努力的一部分,对南非自然科学馆藏(NSCs)的用户进行了一项基于网络的横断面调查。本研究的目的是确定NSCs对研究界的感知价值;在获取用于研究的神经干细胞和相关数据方面感受到或经历的障碍;对国家服务中心目前在满足利益相关者需求方面的表现的看法;以及如何评判nsscs的表现,以及对其未来表现的期望是什么,以更好地满足利益相关者的需求。方法:调查共包含26个问题,通过电子邮件发送到相关研究人员社区邮件列表,并在相关社交媒体群中发布。该调查共有131名受访者完成。结果与结论:该研究表明,国家神经干细胞的重要性及其对南非和国际学生和研究人员社区的可及性的总体看法对他们的研究极其重要。缺乏运营资金和工作人员阻碍了研究人员和其他用户利用国家神经干细胞优化他们的研究和为社会关注的问题做出贡献的能力。国家安全委员会各机构需要作出持续的承诺,共同努力解决各种挑战,包括改善服务利益相关者的需求,这反过来将有助于向决策者展示国家安全委员会的价值,以争取支持和资金。科学界对神经干细胞在研究中的重要性的进一步认识将有助于神经干细胞展示其影响。政治上也应优先考虑体制基础设施的长期维持和不断援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An online survey on user perceptions of natural science collections in South Africa
Background: In South Africa, and globally, the value of natural science collections for scientific research is not widely recognised and has led to its marginalisation, which in turn has resulted in low funding, staffing and use of the collections. Aim & objectives: To this end, as part of the effort to increase understanding and appreciation of the collections, a cross-sectional web-based survey was administered to users of natural science collections (NSCs) in South Africa. The objectives of the study were to identify the perceived value of NSCs to the research community; perceived or experienced barriers in accessing NSCs and associated data for use in research; perceptions of NSCs’ current performance in serving the needs of stakeholders; and how performance is judged and what the expectations are to improve future performance of NSCs to better serve the needs of stakeholders. Methods: The survey consisted of 26 questions, distributed by email to relevant researcher community mailing lists, and posted on relevant social media groups. The survey was completed by 131 respondents. Results & conclusion: The study indicated the overall perception of the importance of NSCs and their accessibility to the student and researcher community in South Africa and internationally to be extremely important to their research. Lack of funding for operations and staff impedes the ability of researchers and other users alike in using NSCs to optimise their research and contribute to issues of societal concern. A sustained commitment is required from NSC institutions to work together to solve various challenges, including improvement in serving stakeholder needs, which will in turn assist with demonstrating the value of NSCs to policymakers, in order to lobby for support and funding. Improved recognition of the importance of NSCs for research by the scientific community will assist NSCs in demonstrating their impact. Political priority should also be given to the long-term upkeep and ongoing assistance of institutional infrastructures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bothalia
Bothalia 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Bothalia: African Biodiversity & Conservation is published by AOSIS for the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and aims to disseminate knowledge, information and innovative approaches that promote and enhance the wise use and management of biodiversity in order to sustain the systems and species that support and benefit the people of Africa. The journal was previously published as Bothalia, and had served the South African botanical community since 1921. However the expanded mandate of SANBI necessitated a broader scope for the journal, and in 2014, the subtitle, African Biodiversity & Conservation was added to reflect this change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信