Oliver P. Thomson , Brett Vaughan , Kesava Sampath , Jerry Draper-Rodi , Michael Fleischmann , Francesco Cerritelli
{"title":"整骨医生治疗方法问卷(Osteo-TAQ) -一项内容效度研究","authors":"Oliver P. Thomson , Brett Vaughan , Kesava Sampath , Jerry Draper-Rodi , Michael Fleischmann , Francesco Cerritelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osteopathy<span> requires reliable and valid research tools to generate evidence on the different aspects of practice including how osteopaths<span> approach the clinical care of patients. Such research will help the osteopathy profession understand its contribution to healthcare provision and communicate this to stakeholders. However, current quantitative tools to measure the different aspects of osteopathic practice are either focused on single pain conditions or developed from other health professional contexts.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel tool developed from qualitative research and aims to measure and describe multiple dimensions of osteopaths’ therapeutic approach to patient care. The aim of this study was to further develop the Osteo-TAQ to assess the content validity of the tool.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A modified nominal group technique (NGT) was employed to establish whether the Osteo-TAQ items were consistent with the underlying construct and to ascertain the prevalence and strength of agreement amongst the expert group panel members (<em>N</em> = 11). A content validity index (CVI) was performed to obtain the evidence for the content validity for a revised version of the Osteo-TAQ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two rounds of review and feedback by an expert panel as part of the NGT resulted in the revision of 13 of the 37 candidate items and refinement of the previously published Osteo-TAQ. Item CVI scores after phase 1 ranged from 0.44 to 1.0 and agreement was reached after two rounds. Data from the expert panel supports the content validity of the revised Osteo-TAQ items based on high levels of agreement with respect to coverage of the construct being measured.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This preliminary work to revise and refine the Osteo-TAQ resulted in a measure that is suitable for further testing as part of a validation research program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Osteopaths’ Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) - A content validity study\",\"authors\":\"Oliver P. Thomson , Brett Vaughan , Kesava Sampath , Jerry Draper-Rodi , Michael Fleischmann , Francesco Cerritelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Osteopathy<span> requires reliable and valid research tools to generate evidence on the different aspects of practice including how osteopaths<span> approach the clinical care of patients. Such research will help the osteopathy profession understand its contribution to healthcare provision and communicate this to stakeholders. However, current quantitative tools to measure the different aspects of osteopathic practice are either focused on single pain conditions or developed from other health professional contexts.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel tool developed from qualitative research and aims to measure and describe multiple dimensions of osteopaths’ therapeutic approach to patient care. The aim of this study was to further develop the Osteo-TAQ to assess the content validity of the tool.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A modified nominal group technique (NGT) was employed to establish whether the Osteo-TAQ items were consistent with the underlying construct and to ascertain the prevalence and strength of agreement amongst the expert group panel members (<em>N</em> = 11). A content validity index (CVI) was performed to obtain the evidence for the content validity for a revised version of the Osteo-TAQ.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two rounds of review and feedback by an expert panel as part of the NGT resulted in the revision of 13 of the 37 candidate items and refinement of the previously published Osteo-TAQ. Item CVI scores after phase 1 ranged from 0.44 to 1.0 and agreement was reached after two rounds. Data from the expert panel supports the content validity of the revised Osteo-TAQ items based on high levels of agreement with respect to coverage of the construct being measured.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This preliminary work to revise and refine the Osteo-TAQ resulted in a measure that is suitable for further testing as part of a validation research program.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000645\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000645","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Osteopaths’ Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) - A content validity study
Background
Osteopathy requires reliable and valid research tools to generate evidence on the different aspects of practice including how osteopaths approach the clinical care of patients. Such research will help the osteopathy profession understand its contribution to healthcare provision and communicate this to stakeholders. However, current quantitative tools to measure the different aspects of osteopathic practice are either focused on single pain conditions or developed from other health professional contexts.
Aim
The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel tool developed from qualitative research and aims to measure and describe multiple dimensions of osteopaths’ therapeutic approach to patient care. The aim of this study was to further develop the Osteo-TAQ to assess the content validity of the tool.
Method
A modified nominal group technique (NGT) was employed to establish whether the Osteo-TAQ items were consistent with the underlying construct and to ascertain the prevalence and strength of agreement amongst the expert group panel members (N = 11). A content validity index (CVI) was performed to obtain the evidence for the content validity for a revised version of the Osteo-TAQ.
Results
Two rounds of review and feedback by an expert panel as part of the NGT resulted in the revision of 13 of the 37 candidate items and refinement of the previously published Osteo-TAQ. Item CVI scores after phase 1 ranged from 0.44 to 1.0 and agreement was reached after two rounds. Data from the expert panel supports the content validity of the revised Osteo-TAQ items based on high levels of agreement with respect to coverage of the construct being measured.
Conclusion
This preliminary work to revise and refine the Osteo-TAQ resulted in a measure that is suitable for further testing as part of a validation research program.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine.
The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
