激光和光源在长期脱发中的功效:系统综述

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
A. Krasniqi, D. P. McClurg, K. Gillespie, S. Rajpara
{"title":"激光和光源在长期脱发中的功效:系统综述","authors":"A. Krasniqi, D. P. McClurg, K. Gillespie, S. Rajpara","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2022.2075899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Laser and light-based devices provide scope for long-term “hair-removal” however, there is limited evidence supporting their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of laser and light-based “hair-removal” devices, taking into account variations in body site-specific variations in hair growthcycles. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with follow-up periods greater than or equal to the length of one complete hair growth cycle in the body site targeted was conducted. Only five eligible RCTs were identified as suitable for inclusion, and these comprised a total of 223 patients. The average long-term hair reduction reported for neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser ranged from 30 to 73.61%, Alexandrite laser ranged from 35 to 84.25%, and Diode laser ranged from 32.5 to 69.2%. In all three devices, the greatest long-term reduction was observed from trials targeting leg hair (1-year growth cycle) and lowest from targeting facial hair (6-month growth cycle). Intense pulsed light (IPL) produced average long-term hair reduction of 52.7–27%; smallest reduction was observed from targeting the face area and greatest from targeting the axillary area (7-month growth cycle). In conclusion, greater long-term hair reduction was observed on body sites with longer hair growth cycles. Future trials should take into account the variation of hair growth cycles across body sites to provide accurate long-term data on treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of lasers and light sources in long-term hair reduction: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"A. Krasniqi, D. P. McClurg, K. Gillespie, S. Rajpara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14764172.2022.2075899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Laser and light-based devices provide scope for long-term “hair-removal” however, there is limited evidence supporting their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of laser and light-based “hair-removal” devices, taking into account variations in body site-specific variations in hair growthcycles. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with follow-up periods greater than or equal to the length of one complete hair growth cycle in the body site targeted was conducted. Only five eligible RCTs were identified as suitable for inclusion, and these comprised a total of 223 patients. The average long-term hair reduction reported for neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser ranged from 30 to 73.61%, Alexandrite laser ranged from 35 to 84.25%, and Diode laser ranged from 32.5 to 69.2%. In all three devices, the greatest long-term reduction was observed from trials targeting leg hair (1-year growth cycle) and lowest from targeting facial hair (6-month growth cycle). Intense pulsed light (IPL) produced average long-term hair reduction of 52.7–27%; smallest reduction was observed from targeting the face area and greatest from targeting the axillary area (7-month growth cycle). In conclusion, greater long-term hair reduction was observed on body sites with longer hair growth cycles. Future trials should take into account the variation of hair growth cycles across body sites to provide accurate long-term data on treatment outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2022.2075899\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2022.2075899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

激光和光基设备提供了长期“脱毛”的范围,然而,支持其长期疗效的证据有限。本研究旨在评估激光和光基“脱毛”装置的长期疗效,同时考虑到毛发生长周期中身体部位的差异。对随访期大于或等于目标身体部位一个完整毛发生长周期长度的随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统综述。只有5个符合条件的随机对照试验被确定为适合纳入,这些随机对照试验共包括223例患者。钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光的平均长期脱毛率为30% ~ 73.61%,翠绿石激光为35% ~ 84.25%,二极管激光为32.5% ~ 69.2%。在所有三种装置中,针对腿毛(生长周期为1年)的试验观察到最大的长期减少,针对面部毛发(生长周期为6个月)的试验观察到最低的长期减少。强脉冲光(IPL)的长期平均脱发率为52.7-27%;针对面部区域观察到最小的减少,而针对腋窝区域观察到最大的减少(7个月的生长周期)。总之,在毛发生长周期较长的身体部位观察到更大的长期毛发减少。未来的试验应考虑到毛发生长周期在身体各个部位的变化,以提供准确的治疗结果的长期数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of lasers and light sources in long-term hair reduction: a systematic review
ABSTRACT Laser and light-based devices provide scope for long-term “hair-removal” however, there is limited evidence supporting their long-term efficacy. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of laser and light-based “hair-removal” devices, taking into account variations in body site-specific variations in hair growthcycles. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with follow-up periods greater than or equal to the length of one complete hair growth cycle in the body site targeted was conducted. Only five eligible RCTs were identified as suitable for inclusion, and these comprised a total of 223 patients. The average long-term hair reduction reported for neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser ranged from 30 to 73.61%, Alexandrite laser ranged from 35 to 84.25%, and Diode laser ranged from 32.5 to 69.2%. In all three devices, the greatest long-term reduction was observed from trials targeting leg hair (1-year growth cycle) and lowest from targeting facial hair (6-month growth cycle). Intense pulsed light (IPL) produced average long-term hair reduction of 52.7–27%; smallest reduction was observed from targeting the face area and greatest from targeting the axillary area (7-month growth cycle). In conclusion, greater long-term hair reduction was observed on body sites with longer hair growth cycles. Future trials should take into account the variation of hair growth cycles across body sites to provide accurate long-term data on treatment outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信