腐败的心理原因:忧虑的作用

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
A. Mironova, A. Tatarko
{"title":"腐败的心理原因:忧虑的作用","authors":"A. Mironova, A. Tatarko","doi":"10.17323/1726-3247-2021-1-11-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is devoted to answering two questions: (1) Do individuals’ worries and sufferings correlate with the acceptability of corruption from their perspectives? (2) Does this correlation differ by country in terms of corruption levels? We focus on analyzing the correlation between macro and micro worries, on one hand, and individual acceptability of corrupt behavior, on the other hand. This study is based on the data from the 6th-wave World Value Survey. We identified three groups of countries based on the corruption perception index: countries with low-level corruption (Australia, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, and Sweden), countries with medium-level corruption (Belarus, China, South Korea, Malaysia, and Romania), and countries with high-level corruption (Russia, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Thailand). For the purposes of our analysis, we used structural equation modeling. We have found that macro and micro worries are significantly correlated with the acceptability of corruption. Our analysis shows that the more the people worry about themselves or their families, the more they accept corruption. The people who worry about society are more likely to disapprove of corruption. However, the significance of these links varies, depending on the group of countries. For the countries with low-level corruption, the correlation is significant only for the link between micro worries and the acceptability of corruption. The countries with high-level corruption show a significant correlation only for the link between macro worries and the acceptability of corruption. For countries with medium-level corruption and for Russia, the acceptability of corruption is significantly correlated with both micro and macro worries.","PeriodicalId":53970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Sociology-Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya","volume":"3 1","pages":"11-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Causes of Corruption: The Role of Worries\",\"authors\":\"A. Mironova, A. Tatarko\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/1726-3247-2021-1-11-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is devoted to answering two questions: (1) Do individuals’ worries and sufferings correlate with the acceptability of corruption from their perspectives? (2) Does this correlation differ by country in terms of corruption levels? We focus on analyzing the correlation between macro and micro worries, on one hand, and individual acceptability of corrupt behavior, on the other hand. This study is based on the data from the 6th-wave World Value Survey. We identified three groups of countries based on the corruption perception index: countries with low-level corruption (Australia, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, and Sweden), countries with medium-level corruption (Belarus, China, South Korea, Malaysia, and Romania), and countries with high-level corruption (Russia, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Thailand). For the purposes of our analysis, we used structural equation modeling. We have found that macro and micro worries are significantly correlated with the acceptability of corruption. Our analysis shows that the more the people worry about themselves or their families, the more they accept corruption. The people who worry about society are more likely to disapprove of corruption. However, the significance of these links varies, depending on the group of countries. For the countries with low-level corruption, the correlation is significant only for the link between micro worries and the acceptability of corruption. The countries with high-level corruption show a significant correlation only for the link between macro worries and the acceptability of corruption. For countries with medium-level corruption and for Russia, the acceptability of corruption is significantly correlated with both micro and macro worries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Sociology-Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"11-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Sociology-Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2021-1-11-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Sociology-Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1726-3247-2021-1-11-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究致力于回答两个问题:(1)个人的忧虑和痛苦是否与他们对腐败的接受程度有关?(2)在腐败程度方面,这种相关性是否因国家而异?我们着重分析宏观和微观担忧与个人对腐败行为的可接受程度之间的关系。本研究基于第六次世界价值调查的数据。我们根据腐败感知指数确定了三组国家:低水平腐败国家(澳大利亚、荷兰、新西兰、新加坡和瑞典),中等水平腐败国家(白俄罗斯、中国、韩国、马来西亚和罗马尼亚),以及高水平腐败国家(俄罗斯、巴西、哥伦比亚、秘鲁和泰国)。为了分析的目的,我们使用了结构方程建模。我们发现,宏观和微观担忧与腐败的可接受性显著相关。我们的分析表明,人们越担心自己或家人,就越容易接受腐败。担心社会的人更有可能反对腐败。然而,这些联系的重要性因国家集团而异。对于腐败程度较低的国家,只有微观担忧与腐败可接受性之间的联系具有显著的相关性。腐败程度高的国家仅在宏观担忧与腐败可接受性之间的联系上显示出显著的相关性。对于腐败程度中等的国家和俄罗斯来说,腐败的可接受性与微观和宏观担忧均显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological Causes of Corruption: The Role of Worries
This study is devoted to answering two questions: (1) Do individuals’ worries and sufferings correlate with the acceptability of corruption from their perspectives? (2) Does this correlation differ by country in terms of corruption levels? We focus on analyzing the correlation between macro and micro worries, on one hand, and individual acceptability of corrupt behavior, on the other hand. This study is based on the data from the 6th-wave World Value Survey. We identified three groups of countries based on the corruption perception index: countries with low-level corruption (Australia, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, and Sweden), countries with medium-level corruption (Belarus, China, South Korea, Malaysia, and Romania), and countries with high-level corruption (Russia, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, and Thailand). For the purposes of our analysis, we used structural equation modeling. We have found that macro and micro worries are significantly correlated with the acceptability of corruption. Our analysis shows that the more the people worry about themselves or their families, the more they accept corruption. The people who worry about society are more likely to disapprove of corruption. However, the significance of these links varies, depending on the group of countries. For the countries with low-level corruption, the correlation is significant only for the link between micro worries and the acceptability of corruption. The countries with high-level corruption show a significant correlation only for the link between macro worries and the acceptability of corruption. For countries with medium-level corruption and for Russia, the acceptability of corruption is significantly correlated with both micro and macro worries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Journal of Economic Sociology is aimed at consolidating international standards of studies in economic sociology, presenting new research carried out by Russian and international scholars, introducing new books and research projects, and attracting young scholars into the field. Journal of Economic Sociology is a specialized academic journal representing the mainstreams of thinking and research in international and Russian economic sociology. Economic Sociology provides a framework for discussion of the following key issues: major theoretical paradigms in economic sociology, sociology of markets and organizations, social and economic strategies of households, informal economy. Journal of Economic Sociology also welcomes research papers written within neighboring disciplines — new institutional economics, anthropology, economic psychology and the related fields, which can be of interest to economic sociologists. Each journal issue presents papers and information organised along the following rubrics: ''Interviews'' contains texts of interviews collected with the leading international scholars in the field of economic sociology and related areas. ''New Texts'' present most recent original papers in economic sociology and related areas. ''New Translations'' offers translations of most important studies into Russian. ''Beyond Borders'' introduces the studies from the neighbor disciplines (institutional economics, economic anthropology, economic psychology, etc.). ''Professional Reviews'' provides overviews of the streams of research and literature in various fields of economic sociology. ''Book reviews'' attracts attention to most important books published in Russia and worldwide. ''Conferences'' shares information on the events already took place or planned for the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信