评论Jared barels的目标文章——如果意识形态只是懒惰呢?

IF 1.9 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1177/14757257231195348

P. De Bruyckere

{"title":"评论Jared barels的目标文章——如果意识形态只是懒惰呢?","authors":"P. De Bruyckere","doi":"10.1177/14757257231195348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this reply to the article “Indoctrination in Introduction to Psychology” by Jared M. Bartels, true to Occam's razor, the argument is made that there is maybe an easier explanation for the mistakes often found in textbooks: laziness. Different examples are presented to make this argument.","PeriodicalId":45061,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT","volume":"19 1","pages":"279 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on Target Article by Jared Bartels—What if Ideology is Rather Just Being Lazy?\",\"authors\":\"P. De Bruyckere\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14757257231195348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this reply to the article “Indoctrination in Introduction to Psychology” by Jared M. Bartels, true to Occam's razor, the argument is made that there is maybe an easier explanation for the mistakes often found in textbooks: laziness. Different examples are presented to make this argument.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"279 - 282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257231195348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257231195348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对Jared M. Bartels的文章《心理学导论中的灌输》(Indoctrination In Introduction to Psychology)的回复，忠实于奥卡姆的剃刀理论。文章中提出的论点是，对于教科书中经常出现的错误，可能有一个更简单的解释:懒惰。提出了不同的例子来证明这一论点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comment on Target Article by Jared Bartels—What if Ideology is Rather Just Being Lazy?

In this reply to the article “Indoctrination in Introduction to Psychology” by Jared M. Bartels, true to Occam's razor, the argument is made that there is maybe an easier explanation for the mistakes often found in textbooks: laziness. Different examples are presented to make this argument.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychology Learning and Teaching-PLAT PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量