转变对指数的看法

IF 1.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Pragmatics Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.1075/prag.21007.bow
M. Bowker
{"title":"转变对指数的看法","authors":"M. Bowker","doi":"10.1075/prag.21007.bow","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe debate over the meanings of indexical expressions has relied heavily on the method of counterexamples. This paper challenges that method by showing that purported counterexamples can often be explained away by appeal to perspective shifts. For these counterexamples to establish anything about indexical reference, we must identify the conditions under which theorists can legitimately appeal to perspective shifts. Some tests for semantic content are considered and it is argued that none of them can tell us when appeal to perspective shift is admissible. The paper then considers how we should proceed if we become convinced that there is no way to identify the content of indexical expressions, offering reasons in favour of a nihilist conception of character over an epistemicist or pluralist conception.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shifting perspective on indexicals\",\"authors\":\"M. Bowker\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/prag.21007.bow\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe debate over the meanings of indexical expressions has relied heavily on the method of counterexamples. This paper challenges that method by showing that purported counterexamples can often be explained away by appeal to perspective shifts. For these counterexamples to establish anything about indexical reference, we must identify the conditions under which theorists can legitimately appeal to perspective shifts. Some tests for semantic content are considered and it is argued that none of them can tell us when appeal to perspective shift is admissible. The paper then considers how we should proceed if we become convinced that there is no way to identify the content of indexical expressions, offering reasons in favour of a nihilist conception of character over an epistemicist or pluralist conception.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21007.bow\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21007.bow","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于索引表达式含义的争论在很大程度上依赖于反例的方法。本文通过展示所谓的反例通常可以通过呼吁视角转换来解释,从而挑战了这种方法。为了让这些反例建立任何关于索引引用的东西,我们必须确定理论家可以合法地呼吁视角转换的条件。本文考虑了语义内容的一些测试,认为它们都不能告诉我们什么时候可以使用视角转换。然后,本文考虑了如果我们确信没有办法识别索引表达式的内容,我们应该如何进行,并提供理由支持虚无主义的角色概念,而不是认识论或多元主义的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shifting perspective on indexicals
The debate over the meanings of indexical expressions has relied heavily on the method of counterexamples. This paper challenges that method by showing that purported counterexamples can often be explained away by appeal to perspective shifts. For these counterexamples to establish anything about indexical reference, we must identify the conditions under which theorists can legitimately appeal to perspective shifts. Some tests for semantic content are considered and it is argued that none of them can tell us when appeal to perspective shift is admissible. The paper then considers how we should proceed if we become convinced that there is no way to identify the content of indexical expressions, offering reasons in favour of a nihilist conception of character over an epistemicist or pluralist conception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatics
Pragmatics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信