不同管制下男子足球联赛的竞争强度:来自英超和德甲的证据

IF 1.9 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Fabio Wagner, Mathias Schubert, H. Preuss, Thomas Könecke
{"title":"不同管制下男子足球联赛的竞争强度:来自英超和德甲的证据","authors":"Fabio Wagner, Mathias Schubert, H. Preuss, Thomas Könecke","doi":"10.1108/sbm-10-2021-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe Premier League (PL) and the Bundesliga (BL) were chosen for this study due to their fundamentally different approaches to ownership regulation and the distribution of media revenues. Regulation in the PL is very liberal if compared to the BL's 50+1-rule. In the BL, the distribution of media revenues is mainly based on past performance, whereas equal distribution is dominant in the PL. The specific aim of this paper was a longitudinal analysis with a focus on the final outcome of the seasons.Design/methodology/approachThis study looks at competitive intensity (CI) in the men's BL and the English PL because it is a crucial indicator for the long-term success of a sports league and the participants. To calculate the CI of both leagues and of all relevant sub-competitions (championship, Champions League (CL), Europa League (EL), Conference League (CoL) and fight against relegation), a CI index (CII) model was generalised and applied for an examination period spanning from 1998/99 to 2020/21.FindingsUntil 2008/09, seasonal CI in the BL was somewhat higher than in the PL. But afterwards, the BL's championship race's CI dropped considerably, while the PL's CI for qualification for the CL rose profoundly. Results also showed that the introduction of the CoL raised the leagues' CI indices.Originality/valueBesides a methodological contribution with the generalisation of the applied CI index model, the findings are discussed in the context of the above-mentioned regulatory and distribution mechanisms also taking into account the very current discussion regarding general regulatory changes within European football.","PeriodicalId":45818,"journal":{"name":"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive intensity in differently regulated men's football leagues: evidence from English premier league and German Bundesliga\",\"authors\":\"Fabio Wagner, Mathias Schubert, H. Preuss, Thomas Könecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sbm-10-2021-0128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe Premier League (PL) and the Bundesliga (BL) were chosen for this study due to their fundamentally different approaches to ownership regulation and the distribution of media revenues. Regulation in the PL is very liberal if compared to the BL's 50+1-rule. In the BL, the distribution of media revenues is mainly based on past performance, whereas equal distribution is dominant in the PL. The specific aim of this paper was a longitudinal analysis with a focus on the final outcome of the seasons.Design/methodology/approachThis study looks at competitive intensity (CI) in the men's BL and the English PL because it is a crucial indicator for the long-term success of a sports league and the participants. To calculate the CI of both leagues and of all relevant sub-competitions (championship, Champions League (CL), Europa League (EL), Conference League (CoL) and fight against relegation), a CI index (CII) model was generalised and applied for an examination period spanning from 1998/99 to 2020/21.FindingsUntil 2008/09, seasonal CI in the BL was somewhat higher than in the PL. But afterwards, the BL's championship race's CI dropped considerably, while the PL's CI for qualification for the CL rose profoundly. Results also showed that the introduction of the CoL raised the leagues' CI indices.Originality/valueBesides a methodological contribution with the generalisation of the applied CI index model, the findings are discussed in the context of the above-mentioned regulatory and distribution mechanisms also taking into account the very current discussion regarding general regulatory changes within European football.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-10-2021-0128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Business and Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-10-2021-0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

之所以选择英超(PL)和德甲(BL)进行研究,是因为它们在所有权监管和媒体收入分配方面有着根本不同的方法。如果与BL的50+1规则相比,PL的规则是非常自由的。在联赛中,媒体收入的分配主要基于过去的表现,而在联赛中,平均分配占主导地位。本文的具体目的是纵向分析,重点关注赛季的最终结果。本研究着眼于男子BL和英国PL的竞争强度(CI),因为它是一个体育联盟和参与者长期成功的关键指标。为了计算联赛和所有相关分项赛事(冠军杯、欧冠联赛、欧联杯联赛、联会联赛和保级联赛)的CI,我们推广了CI指数(CII)模型,并将其应用于1998/99至2020/21赛季的研究期间。直到2008/09赛季,BL的季节CI略高于PL,但之后,BL的冠军赛CI大幅下降,而PL的CL资格CI则大幅上升。结果还表明,引进CoL提高了联盟的CI指数。原创性/价值除了在方法上对应用CI指数模型的推广做出贡献外,研究结果还在上述监管和分配机制的背景下进行了讨论,同时考虑到当前关于欧洲足球监管变化的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competitive intensity in differently regulated men's football leagues: evidence from English premier league and German Bundesliga
PurposeThe Premier League (PL) and the Bundesliga (BL) were chosen for this study due to their fundamentally different approaches to ownership regulation and the distribution of media revenues. Regulation in the PL is very liberal if compared to the BL's 50+1-rule. In the BL, the distribution of media revenues is mainly based on past performance, whereas equal distribution is dominant in the PL. The specific aim of this paper was a longitudinal analysis with a focus on the final outcome of the seasons.Design/methodology/approachThis study looks at competitive intensity (CI) in the men's BL and the English PL because it is a crucial indicator for the long-term success of a sports league and the participants. To calculate the CI of both leagues and of all relevant sub-competitions (championship, Champions League (CL), Europa League (EL), Conference League (CoL) and fight against relegation), a CI index (CII) model was generalised and applied for an examination period spanning from 1998/99 to 2020/21.FindingsUntil 2008/09, seasonal CI in the BL was somewhat higher than in the PL. But afterwards, the BL's championship race's CI dropped considerably, while the PL's CI for qualification for the CL rose profoundly. Results also showed that the introduction of the CoL raised the leagues' CI indices.Originality/valueBesides a methodological contribution with the generalisation of the applied CI index model, the findings are discussed in the context of the above-mentioned regulatory and distribution mechanisms also taking into account the very current discussion regarding general regulatory changes within European football.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sport Business and Management-An International Journal
Sport Business and Management-An International Journal HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信