2015-2019年公路专项拨款资金配置效率分析

Naufal Azaki, A. Lutfi
{"title":"2015-2019年公路专项拨款资金配置效率分析","authors":"Naufal Azaki, A. Lutfi","doi":"10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia, as an archipelago, requires connectivity infrastructures to ease mobility and equitable development. However, the current condition has not reflected a decent quality of road infrastructure. The road sector's special allocation funds are the main instrument for financing local road infrastructure development following national priorities. Departs from this, the study analyzes the extent to which the allocation for the Road Sector in 2015- 2019 complied with the Allocative Efficiency principles as part of the public expenditure management (PEM) framework. The research uses a postpositivism approach with primary data analysis (in-depth interviews) and secondary data in literature reviews, regulatory reviews, and descriptive statistics. The study concluded that the 2015-2019 allocation was not optimally in line with priority-based allocations, a weak medium-term budgeting perspective, poor consolidation within the local autonomy, and several contradictions among regulations. Even though there are several weaknesses in the practice of implementing allocative efficiency principles, the Government's strong commitment is reflected in the Cabinet Review annually and the planned issuance of the Presidential Instruction of Regional Roads. This study brought practical recommendations highlighting the need to sharpen priority targets and recipients, adopt the medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF), and regulatory harmonization. In addition, it is essential to revamp the structure of regional capital spending and the need to accommodate roads in the Minimum Standards Services.","PeriodicalId":33193,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Transformative","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Allocative Efficiency Analysis of Special Allocation Fund for Road Sector in 2015-2019\",\"authors\":\"Naufal Azaki, A. Lutfi\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indonesia, as an archipelago, requires connectivity infrastructures to ease mobility and equitable development. However, the current condition has not reflected a decent quality of road infrastructure. The road sector's special allocation funds are the main instrument for financing local road infrastructure development following national priorities. Departs from this, the study analyzes the extent to which the allocation for the Road Sector in 2015- 2019 complied with the Allocative Efficiency principles as part of the public expenditure management (PEM) framework. The research uses a postpositivism approach with primary data analysis (in-depth interviews) and secondary data in literature reviews, regulatory reviews, and descriptive statistics. The study concluded that the 2015-2019 allocation was not optimally in line with priority-based allocations, a weak medium-term budgeting perspective, poor consolidation within the local autonomy, and several contradictions among regulations. Even though there are several weaknesses in the practice of implementing allocative efficiency principles, the Government's strong commitment is reflected in the Cabinet Review annually and the planned issuance of the Presidential Instruction of Regional Roads. This study brought practical recommendations highlighting the need to sharpen priority targets and recipients, adopt the medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF), and regulatory harmonization. In addition, it is essential to revamp the structure of regional capital spending and the need to accommodate roads in the Minimum Standards Services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Transformative\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Transformative\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Transformative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2023.009.01.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼作为一个群岛国家,需要互联互通基础设施来促进流动性和公平发展。然而,目前的状况并没有反映出道路基础设施的良好质量。道路部门的特别拨款基金是按照国家优先事项为地方道路基础设施发展提供资金的主要工具。在此基础上,该研究分析了2015- 2019年道路部门的拨款在多大程度上符合作为公共支出管理(PEM)框架一部分的分配效率原则。本研究采用后实证主义方法,通过文献综述、监管审查和描述性统计进行主要数据分析(深度访谈)和次要数据。研究认为,2015-2019年分配不符合优先分配,中期预算前景不佳,地方自治内部整合不佳,法规之间存在矛盾。尽管在执行分配效率原则的做法中存在若干弱点,但政府的坚定承诺反映在每年的内阁审查和计划发布的《区域道路总统指示》中。这项研究提出了切实可行的建议,强调需要明确优先目标和受援国、采用中期支出框架和协调管理。此外,必须改革区域资本支出的结构,并考虑到在最低标准服务中容纳道路的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Allocative Efficiency Analysis of Special Allocation Fund for Road Sector in 2015-2019
Indonesia, as an archipelago, requires connectivity infrastructures to ease mobility and equitable development. However, the current condition has not reflected a decent quality of road infrastructure. The road sector's special allocation funds are the main instrument for financing local road infrastructure development following national priorities. Departs from this, the study analyzes the extent to which the allocation for the Road Sector in 2015- 2019 complied with the Allocative Efficiency principles as part of the public expenditure management (PEM) framework. The research uses a postpositivism approach with primary data analysis (in-depth interviews) and secondary data in literature reviews, regulatory reviews, and descriptive statistics. The study concluded that the 2015-2019 allocation was not optimally in line with priority-based allocations, a weak medium-term budgeting perspective, poor consolidation within the local autonomy, and several contradictions among regulations. Even though there are several weaknesses in the practice of implementing allocative efficiency principles, the Government's strong commitment is reflected in the Cabinet Review annually and the planned issuance of the Presidential Instruction of Regional Roads. This study brought practical recommendations highlighting the need to sharpen priority targets and recipients, adopt the medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF), and regulatory harmonization. In addition, it is essential to revamp the structure of regional capital spending and the need to accommodate roads in the Minimum Standards Services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信