移动医疗应用隐私政策:患者想要什么vs.理解

Vikram G. R. Siberry, R. Ratwani, Deliya B. Wesley
{"title":"移动医疗应用隐私政策:患者想要什么vs.理解","authors":"Vikram G. R. Siberry, R. Ratwani, Deliya B. Wesley","doi":"10.1177/2327857922111031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile health applications (apps) are increasingly serving as supplement tools to provider-delivered care in various clinical scenarios. This pilot study explored the relationship between readability of in-app privacy policies and patient comprehension of the policy as well as patient preferences regarding data sharing practices and policy content. Based on interviews with individuals with experience and expertise understanding privacy policies (N=5), a list of important patient-relevant content details was generated for each of the two policies used in the study. Patients (N = 5) then determined important content details from their perspective in the same two policies and answered general questions regarding preferences for personal data sharing. The two app policies differed in length and reading difficulty, yet patients only identified 40% of expert-derived content details in each policy. Patients expressed clear preferences for types and purposes of their data being used by apps and method for privacy policy update notification.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"9 1","pages":"156 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Health App Privacy Policies: What Patients Want vs. Understand\",\"authors\":\"Vikram G. R. Siberry, R. Ratwani, Deliya B. Wesley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2327857922111031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mobile health applications (apps) are increasingly serving as supplement tools to provider-delivered care in various clinical scenarios. This pilot study explored the relationship between readability of in-app privacy policies and patient comprehension of the policy as well as patient preferences regarding data sharing practices and policy content. Based on interviews with individuals with experience and expertise understanding privacy policies (N=5), a list of important patient-relevant content details was generated for each of the two policies used in the study. Patients (N = 5) then determined important content details from their perspective in the same two policies and answered general questions regarding preferences for personal data sharing. The two app policies differed in length and reading difficulty, yet patients only identified 40% of expert-derived content details in each policy. Patients expressed clear preferences for types and purposes of their data being used by apps and method for privacy policy update notification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"156 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857922111031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857922111031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

移动医疗应用程序(app)越来越多地作为补充工具,在各种临床情况下提供医疗服务。这项试点研究探讨了应用内隐私政策的可读性与患者对政策的理解之间的关系,以及患者对数据共享实践和政策内容的偏好。基于对了解隐私政策的经验和专业知识的个人的访谈(N=5),为研究中使用的两种政策中的每一种生成了与患者相关的重要内容细节列表。然后,患者(N = 5)从他们的角度确定了相同两项政策中的重要内容细节,并回答了有关个人数据共享偏好的一般问题。这两种应用程序政策在长度和阅读难度上有所不同,但患者在每种政策中只识别了40%的专家衍生内容细节。患者对应用程序使用其数据的类型和目的以及隐私政策更新通知的方法表达了明确的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile Health App Privacy Policies: What Patients Want vs. Understand
Mobile health applications (apps) are increasingly serving as supplement tools to provider-delivered care in various clinical scenarios. This pilot study explored the relationship between readability of in-app privacy policies and patient comprehension of the policy as well as patient preferences regarding data sharing practices and policy content. Based on interviews with individuals with experience and expertise understanding privacy policies (N=5), a list of important patient-relevant content details was generated for each of the two policies used in the study. Patients (N = 5) then determined important content details from their perspective in the same two policies and answered general questions regarding preferences for personal data sharing. The two app policies differed in length and reading difficulty, yet patients only identified 40% of expert-derived content details in each policy. Patients expressed clear preferences for types and purposes of their data being used by apps and method for privacy policy update notification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信