公共组织采用人力资源信息系统:制度逻辑视角

Q3 Social Sciences
S. Naveed, Aneeqa Suhail, Naveed Saeed Rana
{"title":"公共组织采用人力资源信息系统:制度逻辑视角","authors":"S. Naveed, Aneeqa Suhail, Naveed Saeed Rana","doi":"10.47657/2208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored the adoption, benefits, and challenges of HRIS in a public organization in Pakistan. Using the case study approach, qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews at various levels in a hierarchy. The study found that the organization could not achieve the benefits of HRIS as established in the literature. The adoption of HRIS remained quite slow and resulted in parallel systems (manual and automated) in the organization. In light of institutional logics perspective, the organization is struggling with contradictory pressures from the new logic of HRIS and the previous logic of manual HR system, which is costly for the organization. Out of various barriers identified, in the adoption of HRIS, the most crucial are lack of top management support and less technical knowledge to use the new system. The findings implied that mere adoption of HRIS could not produce the desired results until serious efforts were made for its successful implementation.","PeriodicalId":52112,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adoption of HRIS in the Public Organizations: Institutional Logics Perspective\",\"authors\":\"S. Naveed, Aneeqa Suhail, Naveed Saeed Rana\",\"doi\":\"10.47657/2208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explored the adoption, benefits, and challenges of HRIS in a public organization in Pakistan. Using the case study approach, qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews at various levels in a hierarchy. The study found that the organization could not achieve the benefits of HRIS as established in the literature. The adoption of HRIS remained quite slow and resulted in parallel systems (manual and automated) in the organization. In light of institutional logics perspective, the organization is struggling with contradictory pressures from the new logic of HRIS and the previous logic of manual HR system, which is costly for the organization. Out of various barriers identified, in the adoption of HRIS, the most crucial are lack of top management support and less technical knowledge to use the new system. The findings implied that mere adoption of HRIS could not produce the desired results until serious efforts were made for its successful implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47657/2208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47657/2208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了巴基斯坦某公共组织采用HRIS的情况、益处和挑战。使用案例研究的方法,定性数据是通过在层次结构的各个层次的深入访谈收集的。研究发现,该组织无法实现文献中建立的HRIS的好处。HRIS的采用仍然相当缓慢,导致组织中出现并行系统(手动和自动)。从制度逻辑的角度来看,组织正挣扎于HRIS的新逻辑与之前人工人力资源系统的逻辑的矛盾压力中,这对组织来说是昂贵的。在确定的各种障碍中,在采用人力资源信息系统时,最关键的是缺乏最高管理层的支持和较少的技术知识来使用新系统。调查结果表明,仅仅采用人力资源信息系统不能产生预期的结果,除非为其成功实施作出认真的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adoption of HRIS in the Public Organizations: Institutional Logics Perspective
This study explored the adoption, benefits, and challenges of HRIS in a public organization in Pakistan. Using the case study approach, qualitative data was collected through in-depth interviews at various levels in a hierarchy. The study found that the organization could not achieve the benefits of HRIS as established in the literature. The adoption of HRIS remained quite slow and resulted in parallel systems (manual and automated) in the organization. In light of institutional logics perspective, the organization is struggling with contradictory pressures from the new logic of HRIS and the previous logic of manual HR system, which is costly for the organization. Out of various barriers identified, in the adoption of HRIS, the most crucial are lack of top management support and less technical knowledge to use the new system. The findings implied that mere adoption of HRIS could not produce the desired results until serious efforts were made for its successful implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries
Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The PJIM&L is a double-blind refereed scholarly journal. It is committed to publish original research articles, scholarly critiques and conceptual contributions to the areas of Information Management, Information Science and Librarianship. Ideas and views expressed in papers published in the PJIM&L is the sole responsibility of authors. It does not necessarily reflect opinion/policy of the Department or Editorial Advisory Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信