关于罪的古怪的教义

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION
J. D. R. Mechelke
{"title":"关于罪的古怪的教义","authors":"J. D. R. Mechelke","doi":"10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice “kinky sex.” These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices.","PeriodicalId":42039,"journal":{"name":"Theology & Sexuality","volume":"25 1","pages":"21 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A kinky doctrine of sin\",\"authors\":\"J. D. R. Mechelke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice “kinky sex.” These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theology & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theology & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13558358.2019.1611727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

长期以来,宗教和世俗团体都将那些从事“变态性行为”的人边缘化。这些身体控制的话语已经被解构并被证明是错误的。然而,这个提议比单纯的解构更进一步,并暴露了这种新的解构下的巨大漏洞:对于扭结实践者来说,罪的教义是什么样子的?这个裂开的洞已经被润滑好了,可以填满了。根据一种古怪的教义,罪是违反同意和阻碍逃避,无法接受限制,以及身份的外部本质主义。这种关于罪的怪癖神学不仅对怪癖团体的成员有用,而且对来自各种身份和实践的个人也有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A kinky doctrine of sin
ABSTRACT Religious and secular groups alike have long marginalized those who practice “kinky sex.” These discourses of bodily control have been deconstructed and proven faulty. However, this proposal goes further than mere deconstruction and exposes the gaping hole under this new deconstruction: what does a doctrine of sin look like for kink practitioners? This gaping hole is lubed and ready to be filled. According to a kinky doctrine, sin is violating consent and obstructing escape, the failure to accept limits, and the external essentialism of identity. This kinky theology of sin will not only be useful for members of the kink community but also for individuals from a wide range of identities and practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信