髌骨内侧脱位犬骨盆肢体角度的评估:x线摄影和计算机断层摄影的比较

Q3 Veterinary
R. Garnoeva, М. Paskalev
{"title":"髌骨内侧脱位犬骨盆肢体角度的评估:x线摄影和计算机断层摄影的比较","authors":"R. Garnoeva, М. Paskalev","doi":"10.15547/bjvm.2413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to compare the results from measurements of anatomical and mechanical angles of the femur and tibia by means of two diagnostic imaging methods – conventional radiography and computed tomography in normal dogs and dogs with medial patellar luxation (MPL). The study was done with 16 dogs (23 joints) from four small breeds (Mini-Pinscher, Chi-hua-hua, Yorkshire Terrier and Pomeranian). The results showed statistically significant differences between both imaging techniques in the values of mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA) and anteversion angle (AA) in joints with grade II MPL and in the anatomical lateral and medial distal femoral angles (aLDFA, aMDFA) and AA in grade III MPL. In healthy dogs, both methods differed considerably with regard to values of mechanical medial proximal and mechanical lateral distal femoral angles (mMPFA, mLDFA), the mechanical cranial proximal tibial angle (mCrPTA) and the quadriceps angle (Q-angle).","PeriodicalId":9279,"journal":{"name":"BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of pelvic limb angles in dogs with medial patellar luxation: Comparison of radiography and computed tomography\",\"authors\":\"R. Garnoeva, М. Paskalev\",\"doi\":\"10.15547/bjvm.2413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the present study was to compare the results from measurements of anatomical and mechanical angles of the femur and tibia by means of two diagnostic imaging methods – conventional radiography and computed tomography in normal dogs and dogs with medial patellar luxation (MPL). The study was done with 16 dogs (23 joints) from four small breeds (Mini-Pinscher, Chi-hua-hua, Yorkshire Terrier and Pomeranian). The results showed statistically significant differences between both imaging techniques in the values of mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA) and anteversion angle (AA) in joints with grade II MPL and in the anatomical lateral and medial distal femoral angles (aLDFA, aMDFA) and AA in grade III MPL. In healthy dogs, both methods differed considerably with regard to values of mechanical medial proximal and mechanical lateral distal femoral angles (mMPFA, mLDFA), the mechanical cranial proximal tibial angle (mCrPTA) and the quadriceps angle (Q-angle).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.2413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15547/bjvm.2413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较正常犬和内侧髌骨脱位(MPL)犬的两种诊断成像方法——常规x线摄影和计算机断层摄影——对股骨和胫骨解剖角度和力学角度的测量结果。这项研究是在16只狗(23个关节)中完成的,它们来自四个小品种(迷你平切犬、Chi-hua-hua、约克郡梗和波美拉尼亚)。结果显示,两种成像技术在II级MPL关节的机械股骨外侧近端角(mLPFA)和前倾角(AA)值以及III级MPL关节的解剖性股骨外侧和内侧远端角(aLDFA, aMDFA)和AA值上存在统计学差异。在健康犬中,两种方法在机械股骨内侧近端角和机械股骨外侧远端角(mMPFA, mLDFA)、机械颅骨胫骨近端角(mCrPTA)和股四头肌角(q角)方面的值有很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of pelvic limb angles in dogs with medial patellar luxation: Comparison of radiography and computed tomography
The aim of the present study was to compare the results from measurements of anatomical and mechanical angles of the femur and tibia by means of two diagnostic imaging methods – conventional radiography and computed tomography in normal dogs and dogs with medial patellar luxation (MPL). The study was done with 16 dogs (23 joints) from four small breeds (Mini-Pinscher, Chi-hua-hua, Yorkshire Terrier and Pomeranian). The results showed statistically significant differences between both imaging techniques in the values of mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA) and anteversion angle (AA) in joints with grade II MPL and in the anatomical lateral and medial distal femoral angles (aLDFA, aMDFA) and AA in grade III MPL. In healthy dogs, both methods differed considerably with regard to values of mechanical medial proximal and mechanical lateral distal femoral angles (mMPFA, mLDFA), the mechanical cranial proximal tibial angle (mCrPTA) and the quadriceps angle (Q-angle).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: BJVM is a no-fee open-access scientific quarterly journal which covers topics related to both fundamental and applied aspects of veterinary medicine and to closely connected subjects with it. The journal publishes original papers, short communications and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信