社交媒体帖子中的位置提取和地理编码:比较分析

Q3 Social Sciences
H. N. Serere, Bernd Resch, C. Havas, Andreas Petutschnig
{"title":"社交媒体帖子中的位置提取和地理编码:比较分析","authors":"H. N. Serere, Bernd Resch, C. Havas, Andreas Petutschnig","doi":"10.1553/giscience2021_02_s167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geo-social media have become an established data source for spatial analysis of geographic and social processes in various fields. However, only a small share of geo-social media data are explicitly georeferenced, which often compromises the reliability of the analysis results by excluding large volumes of data from the analysis. To increase the number of georeferenced tweets, inferred locations can be extracted from the texts of social media posts. We propose a customized workflow for location extraction from tweets and subsequent geocoding. We compare the results of two methods: DBpedia Spotlight (using linked Wikipedia entities), and spaCy combined with the geocoding methods of OpenStreetMap Nominatim. The results suggest that the workflow using spaCy and Nominatim identifies more locations than DBpedia Spotlight. For 50,616 tweets posted within California, USA, the granularity of the extracted locations is reasonable. However, several directions for future research were identified, including improved semantic analysis, the creation of a cascading workflow, and the need to integrate different data sources in order to increase reliability and spatial accuracy.","PeriodicalId":29645,"journal":{"name":"GI_Forum","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracting and Geocoding Locations in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"H. N. Serere, Bernd Resch, C. Havas, Andreas Petutschnig\",\"doi\":\"10.1553/giscience2021_02_s167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geo-social media have become an established data source for spatial analysis of geographic and social processes in various fields. However, only a small share of geo-social media data are explicitly georeferenced, which often compromises the reliability of the analysis results by excluding large volumes of data from the analysis. To increase the number of georeferenced tweets, inferred locations can be extracted from the texts of social media posts. We propose a customized workflow for location extraction from tweets and subsequent geocoding. We compare the results of two methods: DBpedia Spotlight (using linked Wikipedia entities), and spaCy combined with the geocoding methods of OpenStreetMap Nominatim. The results suggest that the workflow using spaCy and Nominatim identifies more locations than DBpedia Spotlight. For 50,616 tweets posted within California, USA, the granularity of the extracted locations is reasonable. However, several directions for future research were identified, including improved semantic analysis, the creation of a cascading workflow, and the need to integrate different data sources in order to increase reliability and spatial accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GI_Forum\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GI_Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2021_02_s167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GI_Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2021_02_s167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

地理社交媒体已经成为在各个领域对地理和社会过程进行空间分析的既定数据源。然而,只有一小部分地理社交媒体数据是明确的地理参考,这往往会损害分析结果的可靠性,因为从分析中排除了大量数据。为了增加地理参考推文的数量,可以从社交媒体帖子的文本中提取推断位置。我们提出了一种自定义的工作流程,用于从推文中提取位置和随后的地理编码。我们比较了两种方法的结果:DBpedia Spotlight(使用链接的维基百科实体)和spaCy结合OpenStreetMap Nominatim的地理编码方法。结果表明,使用spaCy和Nominatim的工作流程比DBpedia Spotlight识别更多的位置。对于在美国加利福尼亚州发布的50,616条tweet,提取的位置粒度是合理的。然而,未来研究的几个方向被确定,包括改进语义分析,创建级联工作流,以及需要集成不同的数据源,以提高可靠性和空间精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracting and Geocoding Locations in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis
Geo-social media have become an established data source for spatial analysis of geographic and social processes in various fields. However, only a small share of geo-social media data are explicitly georeferenced, which often compromises the reliability of the analysis results by excluding large volumes of data from the analysis. To increase the number of georeferenced tweets, inferred locations can be extracted from the texts of social media posts. We propose a customized workflow for location extraction from tweets and subsequent geocoding. We compare the results of two methods: DBpedia Spotlight (using linked Wikipedia entities), and spaCy combined with the geocoding methods of OpenStreetMap Nominatim. The results suggest that the workflow using spaCy and Nominatim identifies more locations than DBpedia Spotlight. For 50,616 tweets posted within California, USA, the granularity of the extracted locations is reasonable. However, several directions for future research were identified, including improved semantic analysis, the creation of a cascading workflow, and the need to integrate different data sources in order to increase reliability and spatial accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GI_Forum
GI_Forum Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信