军人及其家属心力衰竭治疗依从性问卷(HFAQ)的编制和心理测量评估:一项混合、探索性和序贯研究

A. Akbarzadeh, A. Zareiyan, Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Y. Ghelich
{"title":"军人及其家属心力衰竭治疗依从性问卷(HFAQ)的编制和心理测量评估:一项混合、探索性和序贯研究","authors":"A. Akbarzadeh, A. Zareiyan, Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Y. Ghelich","doi":"10.5812/jamm-127116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Heart failure (HF) is an important public health issue whose prevalence, hospitalization rate, and costs have increased over the years. Treatment adherence is the behavior of the patient in taking medications, correcting diet, and ability to change lifestyle with the recommendations of the health care provider. Poor treatment adherence contributes to worsening disease outcomes. Currently, according to the literature, no specific instrument is available to measure treatment adherence of HF patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the heart failure treatment adherence questionnaire (HFAQ) for military personnel and their family. Methods: Items were generated by literature review, patient field interviews, and expert opinions. Content validity was assessed by measuring CVR and CVI, while face validity was evaluated by measuring the impact score of each item. The research team performed EGA, bootEGA, and CFA to assess the construct validity, and reliability was assessed by measuring ICC and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Item pool with 86 items was generated consisting of 45 medications, 10 lifestyles, nine diet items, and 22 common items between these three categories. Forty-three items with CVR score lower than 0.62 were removed from the HFAQ. All remained items had acceptable face validity. Cronbach’s alpha and ICC of HFAQ were reported as 0.73 and 0.97, respectively. EGA results represented a four-dimension model for HFAQ with a relatively narrow confidence interval (CI 95% [3.769, 4.231]), and the stability of items, in constructs, ranged from 0.96 to 1. Goodness-of-fit results was reported as χ2 = 535.657, df = 293, χ2/df = 1.828, P-value < .001, CFI = 0.851, and RMSEA = 0.050. Conclusions: HFAQ is the first treatment adherence questionnaire developed specifically for assessing treatment adherence of HF patients and is a valid and reliable 26-item questionnaire that evaluates patients' treatment adherence in three main contexts of medication, physical activity, and diet. HFAQ has four dimensions of health literacy, social and economic, barrier, and patient-provider relationship, which can be used as an intervention for improving treatment outcomes and disease burden.","PeriodicalId":15058,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Heart Failure Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (HFAQ) for Military Personnel and Their Family: A Mixed, Exploratory, and Sequential Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Akbarzadeh, A. Zareiyan, Saeideh Ghaffarifar, Y. Ghelich\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jamm-127116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Heart failure (HF) is an important public health issue whose prevalence, hospitalization rate, and costs have increased over the years. Treatment adherence is the behavior of the patient in taking medications, correcting diet, and ability to change lifestyle with the recommendations of the health care provider. Poor treatment adherence contributes to worsening disease outcomes. Currently, according to the literature, no specific instrument is available to measure treatment adherence of HF patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the heart failure treatment adherence questionnaire (HFAQ) for military personnel and their family. Methods: Items were generated by literature review, patient field interviews, and expert opinions. Content validity was assessed by measuring CVR and CVI, while face validity was evaluated by measuring the impact score of each item. The research team performed EGA, bootEGA, and CFA to assess the construct validity, and reliability was assessed by measuring ICC and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Item pool with 86 items was generated consisting of 45 medications, 10 lifestyles, nine diet items, and 22 common items between these three categories. Forty-three items with CVR score lower than 0.62 were removed from the HFAQ. All remained items had acceptable face validity. Cronbach’s alpha and ICC of HFAQ were reported as 0.73 and 0.97, respectively. EGA results represented a four-dimension model for HFAQ with a relatively narrow confidence interval (CI 95% [3.769, 4.231]), and the stability of items, in constructs, ranged from 0.96 to 1. Goodness-of-fit results was reported as χ2 = 535.657, df = 293, χ2/df = 1.828, P-value < .001, CFI = 0.851, and RMSEA = 0.050. Conclusions: HFAQ is the first treatment adherence questionnaire developed specifically for assessing treatment adherence of HF patients and is a valid and reliable 26-item questionnaire that evaluates patients' treatment adherence in three main contexts of medication, physical activity, and diet. HFAQ has four dimensions of health literacy, social and economic, barrier, and patient-provider relationship, which can be used as an intervention for improving treatment outcomes and disease burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm-127116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archives in Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm-127116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心力衰竭(HF)是一个重要的公共卫生问题,其患病率、住院率和费用逐年增加。治疗依从性是指患者在服用药物、纠正饮食和按照医疗保健提供者的建议改变生活方式方面的行为。治疗依从性差导致疾病结果恶化。目前,根据文献,没有特定的仪器可用于测量心衰患者的治疗依从性。目的:本研究的目的是制定和评估军人及其家属心力衰竭治疗依从性问卷(HFAQ)。方法:采用文献回顾法、患者实地访谈法和专家意见法编制问卷。通过测量CVR和CVI来评估内容效度,通过测量每个项目的影响得分来评估面部效度。研究小组通过EGA、bootEGA和CFA来评估结构效度,并通过测量ICC和Cronbach 's alpha来评估信度。结果:共生成86项题库,其中药物类45项,生活方式类10项,饮食类9项,三者间共有22项。CVR评分低于0.62的43项被从HFAQ中删除。所有剩下的项目都具有可接受的面孔效度。HFAQ的Cronbach’s alpha和ICC分别为0.73和0.97。EGA结果代表了HFAQ的四维模型,置信区间相对较窄(CI 95%[3.769, 4.231]),构建项目的稳定性范围为0.96至1。拟合优度结果为χ2 = 535.657, df = 293, χ2/df = 1.828, p值< 0.001,CFI = 0.851, RMSEA = 0.050。结论:HFAQ是首个专门用于评估心衰患者治疗依从性的治疗依从性问卷,是一份有效可靠的26项问卷,用于评估患者在药物、身体活动和饮食三个主要方面的治疗依从性。HFAQ有卫生素养、社会和经济、障碍和医患关系四个维度,可作为改善治疗结果和疾病负担的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Heart Failure Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (HFAQ) for Military Personnel and Their Family: A Mixed, Exploratory, and Sequential Study
Background: Heart failure (HF) is an important public health issue whose prevalence, hospitalization rate, and costs have increased over the years. Treatment adherence is the behavior of the patient in taking medications, correcting diet, and ability to change lifestyle with the recommendations of the health care provider. Poor treatment adherence contributes to worsening disease outcomes. Currently, according to the literature, no specific instrument is available to measure treatment adherence of HF patients. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the heart failure treatment adherence questionnaire (HFAQ) for military personnel and their family. Methods: Items were generated by literature review, patient field interviews, and expert opinions. Content validity was assessed by measuring CVR and CVI, while face validity was evaluated by measuring the impact score of each item. The research team performed EGA, bootEGA, and CFA to assess the construct validity, and reliability was assessed by measuring ICC and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Item pool with 86 items was generated consisting of 45 medications, 10 lifestyles, nine diet items, and 22 common items between these three categories. Forty-three items with CVR score lower than 0.62 were removed from the HFAQ. All remained items had acceptable face validity. Cronbach’s alpha and ICC of HFAQ were reported as 0.73 and 0.97, respectively. EGA results represented a four-dimension model for HFAQ with a relatively narrow confidence interval (CI 95% [3.769, 4.231]), and the stability of items, in constructs, ranged from 0.96 to 1. Goodness-of-fit results was reported as χ2 = 535.657, df = 293, χ2/df = 1.828, P-value < .001, CFI = 0.851, and RMSEA = 0.050. Conclusions: HFAQ is the first treatment adherence questionnaire developed specifically for assessing treatment adherence of HF patients and is a valid and reliable 26-item questionnaire that evaluates patients' treatment adherence in three main contexts of medication, physical activity, and diet. HFAQ has four dimensions of health literacy, social and economic, barrier, and patient-provider relationship, which can be used as an intervention for improving treatment outcomes and disease burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信