学生科学知识与科学态度:与学生不相信非科学错误信息的相关性

A. Rofieq, A. Fauzi
{"title":"学生科学知识与科学态度:与学生不相信非科学错误信息的相关性","authors":"A. Rofieq, A. Fauzi","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immense students’ belief in misinformation indicates the less optimized quality of science education. However, research that analyzes the predictors of this problem is still rarely done. Biology knowledge (BK) depicts the level of biological information mastered by students; attitude toward science (ATS) is related to students' views when participating in science learning; while disbelief in conspiracy theories (DiCT) describes a person's ability to examine information that contradicts scientific truth. The current research was aimed at analyzing BK, ATS, and DiCT among Biology students, as well as the correlation between the three. The data collection instrument used was an online questionnaire comprising four main sections: demographic items, 15 Biology, and the General Public Questionnaire items, 40 ATS test items, and 8 DiCT items. Analysis was conducted on data from 820 respondents collected from February-March 2022. Some techniques for data analysis were applied, including frequency and percentage estimation, Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis, Dunn's test analysis, Kendall's Tau Correlation, and rank-based estimation regression. This research found that: 1) student’s ages and genders did not significantly contribute to any, while institutional status and study years did to BK and DiCT; 2) study program significantly contributed to ATS, and 3) ATS was found to not correlate significantly with DiCT, but BK was significant by the DiCT. Therefore, BK becomes the main competency that can protect students from unscientific conspiracy theories. This study has revealed a novelty framework about the position of knowledge and attitude in predicting students' abilities when examining misinformation.    ","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes toward Science: Its Correlation on Students’ Disbelief in Non-Scientific Misinformation\",\"authors\":\"A. Rofieq, A. Fauzi\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Immense students’ belief in misinformation indicates the less optimized quality of science education. However, research that analyzes the predictors of this problem is still rarely done. Biology knowledge (BK) depicts the level of biological information mastered by students; attitude toward science (ATS) is related to students' views when participating in science learning; while disbelief in conspiracy theories (DiCT) describes a person's ability to examine information that contradicts scientific truth. The current research was aimed at analyzing BK, ATS, and DiCT among Biology students, as well as the correlation between the three. The data collection instrument used was an online questionnaire comprising four main sections: demographic items, 15 Biology, and the General Public Questionnaire items, 40 ATS test items, and 8 DiCT items. Analysis was conducted on data from 820 respondents collected from February-March 2022. Some techniques for data analysis were applied, including frequency and percentage estimation, Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis, Dunn's test analysis, Kendall's Tau Correlation, and rank-based estimation regression. This research found that: 1) student’s ages and genders did not significantly contribute to any, while institutional status and study years did to BK and DiCT; 2) study program significantly contributed to ATS, and 3) ATS was found to not correlate significantly with DiCT, but BK was significant by the DiCT. Therefore, BK becomes the main competency that can protect students from unscientific conspiracy theories. This study has revealed a novelty framework about the position of knowledge and attitude in predicting students' abilities when examining misinformation.    \",\"PeriodicalId\":37652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.35768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生对错误信息的大量相信表明科学教育质量不够优化。然而,分析这一问题的预测因素的研究仍然很少。生物知识(BK)描述学生对生物信息的掌握程度;科学态度(ATS)与学生参与科学学习的观点有关;而不相信阴谋论(DiCT)则描述了一个人检查与科学真理相矛盾的信息的能力。此次研究的目的是分析生物系学生的BK、ATS和DiCT,以及三者之间的相关性。使用的数据收集工具是一份在线问卷,包括四个主要部分:人口统计项目,15个生物和一般公众问卷,40个ATS测试项目和8个DiCT项目。对2022年2月至3月期间收集的820名受访者的数据进行了分析。采用了频率和百分比估计、Kruskal-Wallis H检验分析、Dunn检验分析、Kendall Tau相关和基于秩的估计回归等数据分析技术。本研究发现:1)学生年龄和性别对BK和DiCT的影响不显著,而学校地位和学习年限对BK和DiCT有显著影响;2)学习计划对ATS有显著影响;3)ATS与DiCT无显著相关,但BK对DiCT有显著影响。因此,BK成为保护学生免受不科学阴谋论影响的主要能力。本研究揭示了一个关于知识和态度在预测学生错误信息能力中的地位的新框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes toward Science: Its Correlation on Students’ Disbelief in Non-Scientific Misinformation
Immense students’ belief in misinformation indicates the less optimized quality of science education. However, research that analyzes the predictors of this problem is still rarely done. Biology knowledge (BK) depicts the level of biological information mastered by students; attitude toward science (ATS) is related to students' views when participating in science learning; while disbelief in conspiracy theories (DiCT) describes a person's ability to examine information that contradicts scientific truth. The current research was aimed at analyzing BK, ATS, and DiCT among Biology students, as well as the correlation between the three. The data collection instrument used was an online questionnaire comprising four main sections: demographic items, 15 Biology, and the General Public Questionnaire items, 40 ATS test items, and 8 DiCT items. Analysis was conducted on data from 820 respondents collected from February-March 2022. Some techniques for data analysis were applied, including frequency and percentage estimation, Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis, Dunn's test analysis, Kendall's Tau Correlation, and rank-based estimation regression. This research found that: 1) student’s ages and genders did not significantly contribute to any, while institutional status and study years did to BK and DiCT; 2) study program significantly contributed to ATS, and 3) ATS was found to not correlate significantly with DiCT, but BK was significant by the DiCT. Therefore, BK becomes the main competency that can protect students from unscientific conspiracy theories. This study has revealed a novelty framework about the position of knowledge and attitude in predicting students' abilities when examining misinformation.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信