未来是朦胧的吗?

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
S. Goudarzi
{"title":"未来是朦胧的吗?","authors":"S. Goudarzi","doi":"10.1115/1.2022-nov2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Direct, large-scale solar management interventions have been part of the fringe of the climate debate for decades. To critics, they were seen as a speculative excuse for not doing the hard work of reducing carbon emissions. It was thought that even asking whether these interventions could be considered created a moral hazard. But the argument that the sole focus should be on greenhouse gas emissions has run into the reality that reduction has been too slow. Is it time to reconsider climate interventions?","PeriodicalId":18406,"journal":{"name":"Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Future Hazy?\",\"authors\":\"S. Goudarzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.2022-nov2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Direct, large-scale solar management interventions have been part of the fringe of the climate debate for decades. To critics, they were seen as a speculative excuse for not doing the hard work of reducing carbon emissions. It was thought that even asking whether these interventions could be considered created a moral hazard. But the argument that the sole focus should be on greenhouse gas emissions has run into the reality that reduction has been too slow. Is it time to reconsider climate interventions?\",\"PeriodicalId\":18406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2022-nov2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2022-nov2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,直接、大规模的太阳能管理干预一直是气候辩论的边缘问题。在批评人士看来,它们被视为不努力减少碳排放的投机借口。人们认为,即使询问这些干预措施是否可以考虑,也会造成道德风险。但是,把唯一的焦点放在温室气体排放上的观点,已经遇到了减排太慢的现实。是时候重新考虑气候干预了吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Future Hazy?
Direct, large-scale solar management interventions have been part of the fringe of the climate debate for decades. To critics, they were seen as a speculative excuse for not doing the hard work of reducing carbon emissions. It was thought that even asking whether these interventions could be considered created a moral hazard. But the argument that the sole focus should be on greenhouse gas emissions has run into the reality that reduction has been too slow. Is it time to reconsider climate interventions?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信