生物气候双皮farades

IF 0.5 0 ARCHITECTURE
William W. Braham
{"title":"生物气候双皮farades","authors":"William W. Braham","doi":"10.1080/24751448.2023.2176142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TA D 7 : 1 or triple glass units, unless comprehensive modeling is done to demonstrate that the building satisfies energy targets. Some of that backlash likely involved a rebellion against the postmodernist articulation of punched openings in curtain walls. However, the fascination with DSFs seems to have deeper origins than these historical conditions and precedents might suggest. Beginning with the mythical discovery of glass under a sailor’s fire on a beach, glass has been the subject of fascination because of its phenomenal properties (Pliny the Elder 1963). Glass has the same relationship with light as water, metal, and crystals; it can be transparent, reflective, or both together; it is a liquid and a solid and casts only ephemeral shadows like air. Mies’s exploration of transparency was formed in opposition to the quasi-occult speculations of the Expressionists around Bruno Taut and Paul Scheerbart, often discounted as steps to proper modern transparency. The contemporary valorization of transparency, which can signal political or institutional openness and even progress itself, only partly conceals the enduring interest in luminous reflections. It could be the power of glass to simultaneously reveal and conceal that keeps the fascination with DSFs alive. Properly understood, DSFs are just a transparent mechanism for capturing and moving heat. Ductwork and HVAC equipment hold no such fascination, but a transparent enclosure serving the same function becomes a technical marvel.","PeriodicalId":36812,"journal":{"name":"Technology Architecture and Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioclimatic Double-Skin Façades\",\"authors\":\"William W. Braham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24751448.2023.2176142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TA D 7 : 1 or triple glass units, unless comprehensive modeling is done to demonstrate that the building satisfies energy targets. Some of that backlash likely involved a rebellion against the postmodernist articulation of punched openings in curtain walls. However, the fascination with DSFs seems to have deeper origins than these historical conditions and precedents might suggest. Beginning with the mythical discovery of glass under a sailor’s fire on a beach, glass has been the subject of fascination because of its phenomenal properties (Pliny the Elder 1963). Glass has the same relationship with light as water, metal, and crystals; it can be transparent, reflective, or both together; it is a liquid and a solid and casts only ephemeral shadows like air. Mies’s exploration of transparency was formed in opposition to the quasi-occult speculations of the Expressionists around Bruno Taut and Paul Scheerbart, often discounted as steps to proper modern transparency. The contemporary valorization of transparency, which can signal political or institutional openness and even progress itself, only partly conceals the enduring interest in luminous reflections. It could be the power of glass to simultaneously reveal and conceal that keeps the fascination with DSFs alive. Properly understood, DSFs are just a transparent mechanism for capturing and moving heat. Ductwork and HVAC equipment hold no such fascination, but a transparent enclosure serving the same function becomes a technical marvel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology Architecture and Design\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology Architecture and Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2023.2176142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Architecture and Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24751448.2023.2176142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

tad7.1或三层玻璃单元,除非进行了全面的建模,以证明建筑物符合能源目标。其中一些反弹可能涉及对后现代主义在幕墙上穿孔的表达方式的反叛。然而,对dsf的迷恋似乎有着比这些历史条件和先例所暗示的更深层次的起源。从沙滩上一名水手在火下发现玻璃的神话故事开始,玻璃因其非凡的特性而成为迷人的主题(老普林尼1963)。玻璃与光的关系与水、金属和晶体的关系相同;它可以是透明的,反射的,或者两者兼而有之;它是液体和固体,像空气一样只投下短暂的影子。密斯对透明度的探索是与布鲁诺·托特(Bruno Taut)和保罗·舍尔巴特(Paul Scheerbart)周围表现主义者的准神秘主义猜测相反形成的,后者通常被认为是迈向适当的现代透明度的步骤。当代对透明度的重视,可以标志着政治或体制的开放,甚至本身的进步,只是部分地掩盖了人们对发光反射的持久兴趣。可能是玻璃同时展现和隐藏的力量让dsf的魅力永存。正确理解,dsf只是一个透明的机制来捕获和移动热量。管道系统和暖通空调设备没有这样的魅力,但具有相同功能的透明外壳成为技术奇迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioclimatic Double-Skin Façades
TA D 7 : 1 or triple glass units, unless comprehensive modeling is done to demonstrate that the building satisfies energy targets. Some of that backlash likely involved a rebellion against the postmodernist articulation of punched openings in curtain walls. However, the fascination with DSFs seems to have deeper origins than these historical conditions and precedents might suggest. Beginning with the mythical discovery of glass under a sailor’s fire on a beach, glass has been the subject of fascination because of its phenomenal properties (Pliny the Elder 1963). Glass has the same relationship with light as water, metal, and crystals; it can be transparent, reflective, or both together; it is a liquid and a solid and casts only ephemeral shadows like air. Mies’s exploration of transparency was formed in opposition to the quasi-occult speculations of the Expressionists around Bruno Taut and Paul Scheerbart, often discounted as steps to proper modern transparency. The contemporary valorization of transparency, which can signal political or institutional openness and even progress itself, only partly conceals the enduring interest in luminous reflections. It could be the power of glass to simultaneously reveal and conceal that keeps the fascination with DSFs alive. Properly understood, DSFs are just a transparent mechanism for capturing and moving heat. Ductwork and HVAC equipment hold no such fascination, but a transparent enclosure serving the same function becomes a technical marvel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Architecture and Design
Technology Architecture and Design Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信