伊朗参与性研究的影响:知识翻译的视角

N. Loori, J. Ahmadzadeh, Kazhal Mobaraki, Ensiyeh Jamshidi, N. Gholizadeh, R. Majdzadeh
{"title":"伊朗参与性研究的影响:知识翻译的视角","authors":"N. Loori, J. Ahmadzadeh, Kazhal Mobaraki, Ensiyeh Jamshidi, N. Gholizadeh, R. Majdzadeh","doi":"10.15761/TIM.1000244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the impacts of Iranian participatory research in practice. Materials/methods: A review of participatory studies conducted to find out published articles (Persian or English) in Iran. The keywords “knowledge translation, knowledge utilization, participatory research, participatory action research, outcome assessment, impact assessment, results” were searched in several domestic and international databases such as Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Iranmedex, SID and Iranpsych. This study included papers published during 2006-2008, to ensure that enough time (ten years) had passed for changes to track the short and long-term effects of researches in the next part as a cross-sectional study. Results: The findings of the cross-sectional study indicated that the greatest changes occurred at participation (92.3%) and empowerment (76.9%) levels in people/ patients; participation and capacity building (38.5%) in researchers; participation and awareness (30.8%) in health care providers groups of stakeholders. Also, the highest scores were attributed to inter-sectoral collaboration (38.5%, 53.8%) and decision-making (30.8%, 38.5%) in health policy-makers and organizational managers, respectively. Conclusions: Community-based participatory research can have a great impact on community participation in the research process, as well as on capacity building and knowledge sharing among researchers. It can also have moderate effects on improving managerial decision-making and inter-sectoral collaboration among organizational managers. translation,","PeriodicalId":23337,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Iranian participatory research impacts: A knowledge translation perspective\",\"authors\":\"N. Loori, J. Ahmadzadeh, Kazhal Mobaraki, Ensiyeh Jamshidi, N. Gholizadeh, R. Majdzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/TIM.1000244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the impacts of Iranian participatory research in practice. Materials/methods: A review of participatory studies conducted to find out published articles (Persian or English) in Iran. The keywords “knowledge translation, knowledge utilization, participatory research, participatory action research, outcome assessment, impact assessment, results” were searched in several domestic and international databases such as Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Iranmedex, SID and Iranpsych. This study included papers published during 2006-2008, to ensure that enough time (ten years) had passed for changes to track the short and long-term effects of researches in the next part as a cross-sectional study. Results: The findings of the cross-sectional study indicated that the greatest changes occurred at participation (92.3%) and empowerment (76.9%) levels in people/ patients; participation and capacity building (38.5%) in researchers; participation and awareness (30.8%) in health care providers groups of stakeholders. Also, the highest scores were attributed to inter-sectoral collaboration (38.5%, 53.8%) and decision-making (30.8%, 38.5%) in health policy-makers and organizational managers, respectively. Conclusions: Community-based participatory research can have a great impact on community participation in the research process, as well as on capacity building and knowledge sharing among researchers. It can also have moderate effects on improving managerial decision-making and inter-sectoral collaboration among organizational managers. translation,\",\"PeriodicalId\":23337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是检视伊朗参与式研究在实践中的影响。材料/方法:对参与性研究进行回顾,以找出在伊朗发表的文章(波斯语或英语)。关键词“知识转化、知识利用、参与式研究、参与式行动研究、结果评估、影响评估、结果”在Pubmed、Medline、Embase、Iranmedex、SID、Iranpsych等国内外数据库中进行检索。本研究纳入了2006-2008年期间发表的论文,以确保足够的时间(十年)已经过去,以便在下一部分中作为横断面研究跟踪研究的短期和长期影响。结果:横断面研究的结果表明,最大的变化发生在人/患者的参与(92.3%)和授权(76.9%)水平;科研人员的参与和能力建设(38.5%);保健提供者利益相关者群体的参与和认识(30.8%)。此外,得分最高的是卫生政策制定者和组织管理者的部门间协作(38.5%,53.8%)和决策(30.8%,38.5%)。结论:基于社区的参与式研究可以对社区参与研究过程、能力建设和知识共享产生重大影响。它还可以对改善管理决策和组织管理者之间的部门间协作产生适度的影响。翻译,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Iranian participatory research impacts: A knowledge translation perspective
Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the impacts of Iranian participatory research in practice. Materials/methods: A review of participatory studies conducted to find out published articles (Persian or English) in Iran. The keywords “knowledge translation, knowledge utilization, participatory research, participatory action research, outcome assessment, impact assessment, results” were searched in several domestic and international databases such as Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Iranmedex, SID and Iranpsych. This study included papers published during 2006-2008, to ensure that enough time (ten years) had passed for changes to track the short and long-term effects of researches in the next part as a cross-sectional study. Results: The findings of the cross-sectional study indicated that the greatest changes occurred at participation (92.3%) and empowerment (76.9%) levels in people/ patients; participation and capacity building (38.5%) in researchers; participation and awareness (30.8%) in health care providers groups of stakeholders. Also, the highest scores were attributed to inter-sectoral collaboration (38.5%, 53.8%) and decision-making (30.8%, 38.5%) in health policy-makers and organizational managers, respectively. Conclusions: Community-based participatory research can have a great impact on community participation in the research process, as well as on capacity building and knowledge sharing among researchers. It can also have moderate effects on improving managerial decision-making and inter-sectoral collaboration among organizational managers. translation,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信