在创造性工作中打开“想法”的包装:多学科回顾

IF 14.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
M. Hua, S. Harvey, E. Rietzschel
{"title":"在创造性工作中打开“想法”的包装:多学科回顾","authors":"M. Hua, S. Harvey, E. Rietzschel","doi":"10.5465/annals.2020.0210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New ideas are central to a wide array of organizational phenomena and research that involve creativity and innovation. Yet, there is little consensus on what the concept of ‘ ideas ’ means, with a broad range of creative outputs being conceptualized as ideas. This fragmentation makes it challenging to compare studies and build a cumulative base of knowledge. To integrate different streams of organizational research, we reviewed papers across the creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, design, knowledge creation, and network literatures. We propose a “ wave-particle duality ” framework of ideas to synthesize two distinct but complementary approaches to understanding and studying ideas. Our framework offers guidance on how to approach the study of ideas, reconciles apparent conflicts in the literature, and suggests opportunities for advancing our understanding of ideas in creative work.","PeriodicalId":48333,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Annals","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking \\\"Ideas\\\" in Creative Work: A Multidisciplinary Review\",\"authors\":\"M. Hua, S. Harvey, E. Rietzschel\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/annals.2020.0210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New ideas are central to a wide array of organizational phenomena and research that involve creativity and innovation. Yet, there is little consensus on what the concept of ‘ ideas ’ means, with a broad range of creative outputs being conceptualized as ideas. This fragmentation makes it challenging to compare studies and build a cumulative base of knowledge. To integrate different streams of organizational research, we reviewed papers across the creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, design, knowledge creation, and network literatures. We propose a “ wave-particle duality ” framework of ideas to synthesize two distinct but complementary approaches to understanding and studying ideas. Our framework offers guidance on how to approach the study of ideas, reconciles apparent conflicts in the literature, and suggests opportunities for advancing our understanding of ideas in creative work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Annals\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Annals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0210\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Annals","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

新想法是涉及创造力和创新的一系列组织现象和研究的核心。然而,对于“想法”的概念意味着什么,人们几乎没有达成共识,大量的创造性产出被概念化为想法。这种碎片化使得比较研究和建立一个累积的知识基础变得具有挑战性。为了整合不同的组织研究流,我们回顾了创造力、创新、创业、设计、知识创造和网络方面的论文。我们提出了一个“波粒二象性”的思想框架,以综合两种不同但互补的方法来理解和研究思想。我们的框架为如何接近思想研究提供了指导,调解了文献中明显的冲突,并提出了在创造性工作中促进我们对思想的理解的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unpacking "Ideas" in Creative Work: A Multidisciplinary Review
New ideas are central to a wide array of organizational phenomena and research that involve creativity and innovation. Yet, there is little consensus on what the concept of ‘ ideas ’ means, with a broad range of creative outputs being conceptualized as ideas. This fragmentation makes it challenging to compare studies and build a cumulative base of knowledge. To integrate different streams of organizational research, we reviewed papers across the creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, design, knowledge creation, and network literatures. We propose a “ wave-particle duality ” framework of ideas to synthesize two distinct but complementary approaches to understanding and studying ideas. Our framework offers guidance on how to approach the study of ideas, reconciles apparent conflicts in the literature, and suggests opportunities for advancing our understanding of ideas in creative work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) is to publish up-to-date, in-depth and integrative reviews of research advances in management. Often called "reviews with an attitude," Annals papers summarize and/or challenge established assumptions and concepts, pinpoint problems and factual errors, inspire discussions, and illuminate possible avenues for further study. Reviews published in Annals move above and beyond descriptions of the field–they motivate conceptual integration and set agendas for future research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信