后现代主义之后的社会学写作

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
B. Agger
{"title":"后现代主义之后的社会学写作","authors":"B. Agger","doi":"10.1177/153270860200200401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author argues that sociological writing needs to shift out of the positivist mode of the report of findings and become unashamedly literary. That is, it must confess its \"authoriality,\" the fact that it has been written with perspective, passion, and political standpoint by an author. In this sense, sociology is science fiction-a way of making an argument using data and analysis. Much positivist sociological writing erases the author's fingerprints from the text with methodology, which is seen to end arguments Informed by Derrida and the Frankfurt School, the author contends that nonpositivist sociological writing confesses its animating assumptions and invites others to join an endless argument about the good. Writing models community in this way and helps bring it about. For sociology to be told as a \"story\" need not delegitimize its findings; objectivity and a literary subjectivity need not clash but can be seen as mutually reinforcing once we abandon the positivist goal of perfect representation.","PeriodicalId":46996,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","volume":"26 1","pages":"427 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociological Writing in the Wake of Postmodernism\",\"authors\":\"B. Agger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/153270860200200401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author argues that sociological writing needs to shift out of the positivist mode of the report of findings and become unashamedly literary. That is, it must confess its \\\"authoriality,\\\" the fact that it has been written with perspective, passion, and political standpoint by an author. In this sense, sociology is science fiction-a way of making an argument using data and analysis. Much positivist sociological writing erases the author's fingerprints from the text with methodology, which is seen to end arguments Informed by Derrida and the Frankfurt School, the author contends that nonpositivist sociological writing confesses its animating assumptions and invites others to join an endless argument about the good. Writing models community in this way and helps bring it about. For sociology to be told as a \\\"story\\\" need not delegitimize its findings; objectivity and a literary subjectivity need not clash but can be seen as mutually reinforcing once we abandon the positivist goal of perfect representation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"427 - 459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860200200401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/153270860200200401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

作者认为,社会学写作需要摆脱报告发现的实证主义模式,变得毫不羞耻地文学化。也就是说,它必须承认它的“权威性”,即它是作者带着观点、激情和政治立场写出来的。从这个意义上说,社会学是科幻小说——一种利用数据和分析进行论证的方式。许多实证主义社会学著作用方法论从文本中抹去了作者的印记,这被视为结束了德里达和法兰克福学派的争论,作者认为,非实证主义社会学著作承认了其生动的假设,并邀请其他人加入关于善的无休止的争论。写作以这种方式为社区建模,并帮助实现它。要把社会学作为一个“故事”来讲述,不需要使它的发现失去合法性;客观性和文学的主体性不一定会冲突,但一旦我们放弃了完美表现的实证主义目标,它们就可以被视为相互加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sociological Writing in the Wake of Postmodernism
The author argues that sociological writing needs to shift out of the positivist mode of the report of findings and become unashamedly literary. That is, it must confess its "authoriality," the fact that it has been written with perspective, passion, and political standpoint by an author. In this sense, sociology is science fiction-a way of making an argument using data and analysis. Much positivist sociological writing erases the author's fingerprints from the text with methodology, which is seen to end arguments Informed by Derrida and the Frankfurt School, the author contends that nonpositivist sociological writing confesses its animating assumptions and invites others to join an endless argument about the good. Writing models community in this way and helps bring it about. For sociology to be told as a "story" need not delegitimize its findings; objectivity and a literary subjectivity need not clash but can be seen as mutually reinforcing once we abandon the positivist goal of perfect representation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The mandate for this interdisciplinary, international journal is to move methods talk in cultural studies to the forefront, into the regions of moral, ethical and political discourse. The commitment to imagine a more democratic society has been sa guiding feature of cultural studies from the very beginnnig. Contributors to this journal understand that the discourses of a critical, moral methodology are basic to any effort to re-engage the promise of the social sciences and the humanities for democracy in the 21st Century. We seek works that connect critical emanicipatory theories to new forms of social justice and democratic practice are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信