另一种方式的“智能”:Fab City方法重新配置城市动态的潜力

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES
Yannick Rumpala
{"title":"另一种方式的“智能”:Fab City方法重新配置城市动态的潜力","authors":"Yannick Rumpala","doi":"10.1080/17535069.2021.2009551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Is the ‘Smart City’ the only ‘smart’ city model? Not necessarily, if we consider the space opened by the ‘Fab City’ project, which expands the idea of fab labs and seems to constitute an alternative approach to urban functioning. In this approach, production is delivered at the city level, close to the inhabitants, with the promise of being able to meet some basic needs, notably through manufacturing workshops that are located in the neighborhoods and that put relatively advanced machines at the disposal of local communities. Proponents of the ‘Fab City’ promote a city where citizens once again become manufacturers and take responsibility for their own needs, reclaiming technologies collaboratively and contributing to the control of various flows (materials, energy, etc.) which shape urban ecological situations. In order to evaluate to what extent this project can constitute an original and even alternative guiding framework adapted to certain rising urban challenges, this contribution begins by studying its emergence and the rationale on which it is built, so as to better identify the vision it rests on and its embedded socio-technical dimensions. The contribution then specifies and analyzes the issues that are reframed and the strategic implications that result from them, demonstrating how this approach tends to displace ways of considering cities and their functioning. The analysis thus highlights the intellectual and operational space available for a different type of project and trajectory for cities that wish to have an alternative locally anchored way of using technical resources in the service of the inhabitants while better respecting ecological constraints.","PeriodicalId":46604,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research & Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":"271 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Smart’ in another way: the potential of the Fab City approach to reconfigure urban dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Yannick Rumpala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17535069.2021.2009551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Is the ‘Smart City’ the only ‘smart’ city model? Not necessarily, if we consider the space opened by the ‘Fab City’ project, which expands the idea of fab labs and seems to constitute an alternative approach to urban functioning. In this approach, production is delivered at the city level, close to the inhabitants, with the promise of being able to meet some basic needs, notably through manufacturing workshops that are located in the neighborhoods and that put relatively advanced machines at the disposal of local communities. Proponents of the ‘Fab City’ promote a city where citizens once again become manufacturers and take responsibility for their own needs, reclaiming technologies collaboratively and contributing to the control of various flows (materials, energy, etc.) which shape urban ecological situations. In order to evaluate to what extent this project can constitute an original and even alternative guiding framework adapted to certain rising urban challenges, this contribution begins by studying its emergence and the rationale on which it is built, so as to better identify the vision it rests on and its embedded socio-technical dimensions. The contribution then specifies and analyzes the issues that are reframed and the strategic implications that result from them, demonstrating how this approach tends to displace ways of considering cities and their functioning. The analysis thus highlights the intellectual and operational space available for a different type of project and trajectory for cities that wish to have an alternative locally anchored way of using technical resources in the service of the inhabitants while better respecting ecological constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"271 - 293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.2009551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.2009551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智慧城市是唯一的智慧城市模式吗?如果我们考虑到“Fab City”项目所开放的空间,就不一定了,它扩展了Fab实验室的概念,似乎构成了城市功能的另一种方式。在这种方法中,生产在城市层面上交付,靠近居民,并承诺能够满足一些基本需求,特别是通过位于社区的制造车间,并为当地社区提供相对先进的机器。“Fab City”的支持者提倡市民再次成为制造商,为自己的需求负责,协同回收技术,并为控制各种流动(材料,能源等)做出贡献,从而塑造城市生态环境。为了评估该项目在多大程度上可以构成适应某些日益上升的城市挑战的原始甚至替代指导框架,本贡献首先研究其出现及其建立的基本原理,以便更好地确定其所依赖的愿景及其嵌入的社会技术层面。然后,文章详细说明并分析了重新构建的问题以及由此产生的战略影响,并展示了这种方法如何倾向于取代考虑城市及其功能的方式。因此,分析强调了不同类型的项目和城市轨迹的知识和操作空间,这些项目和轨迹希望有一种替代的本地固定方式,利用技术资源为居民服务,同时更好地尊重生态约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Smart’ in another way: the potential of the Fab City approach to reconfigure urban dynamics
ABSTRACT Is the ‘Smart City’ the only ‘smart’ city model? Not necessarily, if we consider the space opened by the ‘Fab City’ project, which expands the idea of fab labs and seems to constitute an alternative approach to urban functioning. In this approach, production is delivered at the city level, close to the inhabitants, with the promise of being able to meet some basic needs, notably through manufacturing workshops that are located in the neighborhoods and that put relatively advanced machines at the disposal of local communities. Proponents of the ‘Fab City’ promote a city where citizens once again become manufacturers and take responsibility for their own needs, reclaiming technologies collaboratively and contributing to the control of various flows (materials, energy, etc.) which shape urban ecological situations. In order to evaluate to what extent this project can constitute an original and even alternative guiding framework adapted to certain rising urban challenges, this contribution begins by studying its emergence and the rationale on which it is built, so as to better identify the vision it rests on and its embedded socio-technical dimensions. The contribution then specifies and analyzes the issues that are reframed and the strategic implications that result from them, demonstrating how this approach tends to displace ways of considering cities and their functioning. The analysis thus highlights the intellectual and operational space available for a different type of project and trajectory for cities that wish to have an alternative locally anchored way of using technical resources in the service of the inhabitants while better respecting ecological constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Research & Practice URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信