老年痴呆患者的握力:信度研究

Mariana Asmar Alencar, João Marcos Domingues Dias, L. C. Figueiredo, R. Dias
{"title":"老年痴呆患者的握力:信度研究","authors":"Mariana Asmar Alencar, João Marcos Domingues Dias, L. C. Figueiredo, R. Dias","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552012005000059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measuring instruments should have their scientific and clinical value evaluated in different populations. The handgrip strength test is widely used, however little has been investigated about its reliability when used in elderly with dementia and the right stage wich its use should be avoided. Objectives: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of the handgrip strength test in elderly with different ratings of dementia. Method: The cognitive function of 76 elderly subjects with dementia was measured, and the caregivers were interviewed to allow classification by the Clinical dementia rating (CDR). For these assessments the Mini-Metal State Examination and the Pfeffer, Lawton, and Katz scales were used. Twenty subjects were classified as borderline (83.4± 5.8 years), 19 as mild (82.4±6.8 years), 19 as moderate (85.8±5.6 years) and 18 as severe dementia (84.0±5.1 years). Handgrip strength was assessed with a JAMAR hydraulic dynamometer and after one week it was reevaluated. Reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The significance level was set at α=0.05. Results: Test-retest reliability was excellent for groups with borderline (ICC=0.975; p=0.001), mild (ICC=0.968; p=0.002), and moderate (ICC=0.964; p=0.001) dementia. The analysis of the group with a severe CDR showed no statistical significance and a low ICC (ICC=0.415; p=0.376). Conclusion: The handgrip strength test has excellent reliability when used in elderly with borderline, mild, and moderate dementia, which enables its use in research. However, its use is not recommended in elderly classified with severe dementia due to the measure's low reliability and subsequent irrelevance in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"29 1","pages":"510-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Força de preensão palmar em idosos com demência: estudo da confiabilidade\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Asmar Alencar, João Marcos Domingues Dias, L. C. Figueiredo, R. Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1413-35552012005000059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Measuring instruments should have their scientific and clinical value evaluated in different populations. The handgrip strength test is widely used, however little has been investigated about its reliability when used in elderly with dementia and the right stage wich its use should be avoided. Objectives: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of the handgrip strength test in elderly with different ratings of dementia. Method: The cognitive function of 76 elderly subjects with dementia was measured, and the caregivers were interviewed to allow classification by the Clinical dementia rating (CDR). For these assessments the Mini-Metal State Examination and the Pfeffer, Lawton, and Katz scales were used. Twenty subjects were classified as borderline (83.4± 5.8 years), 19 as mild (82.4±6.8 years), 19 as moderate (85.8±5.6 years) and 18 as severe dementia (84.0±5.1 years). Handgrip strength was assessed with a JAMAR hydraulic dynamometer and after one week it was reevaluated. Reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The significance level was set at α=0.05. Results: Test-retest reliability was excellent for groups with borderline (ICC=0.975; p=0.001), mild (ICC=0.968; p=0.002), and moderate (ICC=0.964; p=0.001) dementia. The analysis of the group with a severe CDR showed no statistical significance and a low ICC (ICC=0.415; p=0.376). Conclusion: The handgrip strength test has excellent reliability when used in elderly with borderline, mild, and moderate dementia, which enables its use in research. However, its use is not recommended in elderly classified with severe dementia due to the measure's low reliability and subsequent irrelevance in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"510-514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552012005000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

背景:测量仪器应在不同人群中评估其科学和临床价值。握力测试被广泛使用,但其在老年痴呆患者中应用的可靠性及应避免使用的正确阶段的研究却很少。目的:评价不同痴呆评分老年人握力测验的重测信度。方法:对76例老年痴呆患者的认知功能进行测量,并对照顾者进行访谈,采用临床痴呆评分(CDR)进行分类。在这些评估中,使用了迷你金属状态检查和Pfeffer, Lawton和Katz量表。20例为交界性痴呆(83.4±5.8岁),19例为轻度痴呆(82.4±6.8岁),19例为中度痴呆(85.8±5.6岁),18例为重度痴呆(84.0±5.1岁)。用JAMAR液压测功仪评估握力,一周后重新评估。采用类内相关系数(Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)分析信度。显著性水平设为α=0.05。结果:临界组重测信度极好(ICC=0.975;p=0.001),轻度(ICC=0.968;p=0.002),中度(ICC=0.964;p = 0.001)痴呆。重症CDR组分析无统计学意义,ICC低(ICC=0.415;p = 0.376)。结论:握力测试在老年边缘性、轻度、中度痴呆患者中具有良好的信度,可用于研究。然而,由于该方法的可靠性较低且与临床实践无关,不建议在重度痴呆的老年人中使用该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Força de preensão palmar em idosos com demência: estudo da confiabilidade
Background: Measuring instruments should have their scientific and clinical value evaluated in different populations. The handgrip strength test is widely used, however little has been investigated about its reliability when used in elderly with dementia and the right stage wich its use should be avoided. Objectives: To evaluate the test-retest reliability of the handgrip strength test in elderly with different ratings of dementia. Method: The cognitive function of 76 elderly subjects with dementia was measured, and the caregivers were interviewed to allow classification by the Clinical dementia rating (CDR). For these assessments the Mini-Metal State Examination and the Pfeffer, Lawton, and Katz scales were used. Twenty subjects were classified as borderline (83.4± 5.8 years), 19 as mild (82.4±6.8 years), 19 as moderate (85.8±5.6 years) and 18 as severe dementia (84.0±5.1 years). Handgrip strength was assessed with a JAMAR hydraulic dynamometer and after one week it was reevaluated. Reliability was analyzed by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The significance level was set at α=0.05. Results: Test-retest reliability was excellent for groups with borderline (ICC=0.975; p=0.001), mild (ICC=0.968; p=0.002), and moderate (ICC=0.964; p=0.001) dementia. The analysis of the group with a severe CDR showed no statistical significance and a low ICC (ICC=0.415; p=0.376). Conclusion: The handgrip strength test has excellent reliability when used in elderly with borderline, mild, and moderate dementia, which enables its use in research. However, its use is not recommended in elderly classified with severe dementia due to the measure's low reliability and subsequent irrelevance in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信