磁石学校的自愿种族融合

James E. Rosenbaum, Stefan Presser
{"title":"磁石学校的自愿种族融合","authors":"James E. Rosenbaum, Stefan Presser","doi":"10.1086/443404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magnet schools have become the latest answer to the problem of racially segregated schools. Political backlash and the specter of \"white flight\" have begun to turn some political leaders and courts away from compulsory integration programs and toward voluntary plans to accomplish integration. Magnet schools, so called because they attract-rather than force-students to attend, have been discussed as an approach to integration for at least a decade, but it is only in recent years that the idea has attracted national attention, has been implemented to a significant extent, and has been held out as the answer for accomplishing integration. In the spring of 1976, President Ford was reported to be \"considering the use of Federal money to produce a substitute for busing, perhaps by establishing magnet schools.\"' A search through the ERIC file reveals that at least a dozen cities are planning or have initiated magnet school programs, including Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dayton, Houston, Los Angeles, Mt. Vernon (New York), New York City, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Stamford (Connecticut), and Tacoma (Washington). Magnet schools are premised on the belief that quality education, not integration, is the real issue and that if they can provide high quality education in an integrated setting, then blacks and whites will choose to attend them. Reports in the ERIC file indicate that magnet schools rely on similar kinds of features to attract students: additional resources, individualized instruction, specialized programs tailored to students' individual talents. The reports also suggest that these schools are glowing successes, and, although these claims may be exaggerated, they convey an image of hopefulness and enthusiasm","PeriodicalId":83260,"journal":{"name":"The School science review","volume":"7 1","pages":"156 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary Racial Integration in a Magnet School\",\"authors\":\"James E. Rosenbaum, Stefan Presser\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/443404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Magnet schools have become the latest answer to the problem of racially segregated schools. Political backlash and the specter of \\\"white flight\\\" have begun to turn some political leaders and courts away from compulsory integration programs and toward voluntary plans to accomplish integration. Magnet schools, so called because they attract-rather than force-students to attend, have been discussed as an approach to integration for at least a decade, but it is only in recent years that the idea has attracted national attention, has been implemented to a significant extent, and has been held out as the answer for accomplishing integration. In the spring of 1976, President Ford was reported to be \\\"considering the use of Federal money to produce a substitute for busing, perhaps by establishing magnet schools.\\\"' A search through the ERIC file reveals that at least a dozen cities are planning or have initiated magnet school programs, including Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dayton, Houston, Los Angeles, Mt. Vernon (New York), New York City, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Stamford (Connecticut), and Tacoma (Washington). Magnet schools are premised on the belief that quality education, not integration, is the real issue and that if they can provide high quality education in an integrated setting, then blacks and whites will choose to attend them. Reports in the ERIC file indicate that magnet schools rely on similar kinds of features to attract students: additional resources, individualized instruction, specialized programs tailored to students' individual talents. The reports also suggest that these schools are glowing successes, and, although these claims may be exaggerated, they convey an image of hopefulness and enthusiasm\",\"PeriodicalId\":83260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The School science review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"156 - 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The School science review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/443404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The School science review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/443404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

磁铁学校已经成为种族隔离学校问题的最新答案。政治上的反弹和“白人逃亡”的幽灵已经开始使一些政治领导人和法院从强制性的种族融合计划转向自愿计划来实现种族融合。磁石学校之所以被称为磁石学校,是因为它们吸引而不是强迫学生入学,作为一种实现融合的方法已经被讨论了至少十年,但直到最近几年,这个想法才引起了全国的关注,并在很大程度上得到了实施,并被认为是实现融合的答案。1976年春天,据报道,福特总统正在“考虑用联邦资金来生产校车的替代品,也许可以通过建立磁石学校来实现。”通过对ERIC文件的搜索可以发现,至少有十几个城市正在计划或已经启动了磁石学校项目,包括波士顿、芝加哥、辛辛那提、克利夫兰、代顿、休斯顿、洛杉矶、弗农山(纽约)、纽约市、费城、圣路易斯、斯坦福德(康涅狄格州)和塔科马(华盛顿)。磁铁学校的前提是相信质量教育,而不是种族融合,才是真正的问题,如果他们能在种族融合的环境中提供高质量的教育,那么黑人和白人都会选择去上学。ERIC文件中的报告表明,磁铁学校依靠类似的特点来吸引学生:额外的资源、个性化的指导、针对学生个人才能量身定制的专业课程。这些报告还表明,这些学校取得了辉煌的成功,尽管这些说法可能被夸大了,但它们传达了一种充满希望和热情的形象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voluntary Racial Integration in a Magnet School
Magnet schools have become the latest answer to the problem of racially segregated schools. Political backlash and the specter of "white flight" have begun to turn some political leaders and courts away from compulsory integration programs and toward voluntary plans to accomplish integration. Magnet schools, so called because they attract-rather than force-students to attend, have been discussed as an approach to integration for at least a decade, but it is only in recent years that the idea has attracted national attention, has been implemented to a significant extent, and has been held out as the answer for accomplishing integration. In the spring of 1976, President Ford was reported to be "considering the use of Federal money to produce a substitute for busing, perhaps by establishing magnet schools."' A search through the ERIC file reveals that at least a dozen cities are planning or have initiated magnet school programs, including Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dayton, Houston, Los Angeles, Mt. Vernon (New York), New York City, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Stamford (Connecticut), and Tacoma (Washington). Magnet schools are premised on the belief that quality education, not integration, is the real issue and that if they can provide high quality education in an integrated setting, then blacks and whites will choose to attend them. Reports in the ERIC file indicate that magnet schools rely on similar kinds of features to attract students: additional resources, individualized instruction, specialized programs tailored to students' individual talents. The reports also suggest that these schools are glowing successes, and, although these claims may be exaggerated, they convey an image of hopefulness and enthusiasm
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信