费用分摊对癌症筛查和价格购物的影响:来自平价医疗法案的证据

C. Whaley
{"title":"费用分摊对癌症筛查和价格购物的影响:来自平价医疗法案的证据","authors":"C. Whaley","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but the cost-sharing environment for colonoscopies, the preferred form of screening, is complex. This paper combines a machine learning-based double-selection algorithm to perform principled covariate selection with differential exposure to the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that insurers fully cover cancer screening services as an instrumental variable to estimate the effect of cost sharing on colonoscopy utilization and price-shopping. The reduced form results show that the ACA’s requirements increased the use of colonoscopies by 1.7% and the IV results imply a price elasticity of 0.09. I do not find a price shopping response.","PeriodicalId":19714,"journal":{"name":"Oncology eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Cost Sharing on Cancer Screening and Price Shopping: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act\",\"authors\":\"C. Whaley\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3264607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but the cost-sharing environment for colonoscopies, the preferred form of screening, is complex. This paper combines a machine learning-based double-selection algorithm to perform principled covariate selection with differential exposure to the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that insurers fully cover cancer screening services as an instrumental variable to estimate the effect of cost sharing on colonoscopy utilization and price-shopping. The reduced form results show that the ACA’s requirements increased the use of colonoscopies by 1.7% and the IV results imply a price elasticity of 0.09. I do not find a price shopping response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3264607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3264607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

结直肠癌是癌症相关死亡的第二大原因,但结肠镜检查的费用分摊环境是复杂的,结肠镜检查是首选的筛查形式。本文结合了基于机器学习的双重选择算法来执行原则性的共变量选择,并对《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)的要求进行差异暴露,该法案要求保险公司完全覆盖癌症筛查服务,作为评估成本分摊对结肠镜检查使用率和价格购物的影响的工具变量。简化形式的结果表明,ACA的要求使结肠镜检查的使用增加了1.7%,IV结果意味着价格弹性为0.09。我没有发现价格购物的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Cost Sharing on Cancer Screening and Price Shopping: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act
Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality, but the cost-sharing environment for colonoscopies, the preferred form of screening, is complex. This paper combines a machine learning-based double-selection algorithm to perform principled covariate selection with differential exposure to the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that insurers fully cover cancer screening services as an instrumental variable to estimate the effect of cost sharing on colonoscopy utilization and price-shopping. The reduced form results show that the ACA’s requirements increased the use of colonoscopies by 1.7% and the IV results imply a price elasticity of 0.09. I do not find a price shopping response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信