欧洲抵押贷款市场与金融机构

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
S. Akçay, Begüm Güler
{"title":"欧洲抵押贷款市场与金融机构","authors":"S. Akçay, Begüm Güler","doi":"10.53383/100331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to measure the institutional features of residential mortgage\n markets in the European Union (EU) countries. The institutional features of the mortgage\n markets include access to credit information, protection of creditor rights, and\n enforcement of contracts among others, and attributes that define the evolution and\n functioning of mortgage markets. Differences among these features lead to institutional\n variations in mortgage markets among countries. In this study, we measure the\n institutional features along four dimensions (financial, legal, openness and cultural),\n and compare them to a benchmark. To achieve this, composite indices (overall index and\n its sub-indices) are developed with the use of a factor analysis. The findings show that\n the institutional features of the EU mortgage markets are diverse; northern European\n countries and the United Kingdom (UK) take the lead with respect to the institutional\n environment of their mortgage markets and have markets with higher institutional quality\n than the others. That is, these countries have mortgage markets with a more efficient\n legal framework, more government transparency in policymaking, easier access to\n financial services and credit information, etc.","PeriodicalId":44050,"journal":{"name":"International Real Estate Review","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European Mortgage Markets Versus Institutions\",\"authors\":\"S. Akçay, Begüm Güler\",\"doi\":\"10.53383/100331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to measure the institutional features of residential mortgage\\n markets in the European Union (EU) countries. The institutional features of the mortgage\\n markets include access to credit information, protection of creditor rights, and\\n enforcement of contracts among others, and attributes that define the evolution and\\n functioning of mortgage markets. Differences among these features lead to institutional\\n variations in mortgage markets among countries. In this study, we measure the\\n institutional features along four dimensions (financial, legal, openness and cultural),\\n and compare them to a benchmark. To achieve this, composite indices (overall index and\\n its sub-indices) are developed with the use of a factor analysis. The findings show that\\n the institutional features of the EU mortgage markets are diverse; northern European\\n countries and the United Kingdom (UK) take the lead with respect to the institutional\\n environment of their mortgage markets and have markets with higher institutional quality\\n than the others. That is, these countries have mortgage markets with a more efficient\\n legal framework, more government transparency in policymaking, easier access to\\n financial services and credit information, etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Real Estate Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Real Estate Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53383/100331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Real Estate Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53383/100331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在衡量欧盟(EU)国家住宅抵押贷款市场的制度特征。抵押贷款市场的制度特征包括获取信用信息、保护债权人权利和执行合同等,以及定义抵押贷款市场演变和功能的属性。这些特征之间的差异导致了各国抵押贷款市场的制度差异。在本研究中,我们从四个维度(金融、法律、开放和文化)来衡量制度特征,并将它们与基准进行比较。为了实现这一目标,综合指数(总体指数及其子指数)是利用因子分析开发的。研究结果表明,欧盟抵押贷款市场的制度特征是多样化的;北欧国家和英国在其抵押贷款市场的制度环境方面处于领先地位,其市场的制度质量高于其他国家。也就是说,这些国家的抵押贷款市场具有更有效的法律框架、更透明的政府决策、更容易获得金融服务和信贷信息等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
European Mortgage Markets Versus Institutions
This study aims to measure the institutional features of residential mortgage markets in the European Union (EU) countries. The institutional features of the mortgage markets include access to credit information, protection of creditor rights, and enforcement of contracts among others, and attributes that define the evolution and functioning of mortgage markets. Differences among these features lead to institutional variations in mortgage markets among countries. In this study, we measure the institutional features along four dimensions (financial, legal, openness and cultural), and compare them to a benchmark. To achieve this, composite indices (overall index and its sub-indices) are developed with the use of a factor analysis. The findings show that the institutional features of the EU mortgage markets are diverse; northern European countries and the United Kingdom (UK) take the lead with respect to the institutional environment of their mortgage markets and have markets with higher institutional quality than the others. That is, these countries have mortgage markets with a more efficient legal framework, more government transparency in policymaking, easier access to financial services and credit information, etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信