{"title":"在年龄较大的青少年中比较牙骨性和牙源性快速上颌骨扩张的短期效果。","authors":"Mustafa Gokturk, Mehmet Ali Yavan","doi":"10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (p < 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm; p < 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°; p < 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.</p>","PeriodicalId":54776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Gokturk, Mehmet Ali Yavan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (p < 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm; p < 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°; p < 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics-Fortschritte Der Kieferorthopadie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents.
Purpose: To compare the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.
Methods: The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.
Results: Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (p < 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm; p < 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°; p < 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°; p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics provides orthodontists and dentists who are also actively interested in orthodontics, whether in university clinics or private practice, with highly authoritative and up-to-date information based on experimental and clinical research. The journal is one of the leading publications for the promulgation of the results of original work both in the areas of scientific and clinical orthodontics and related areas. All articles undergo peer review before publication. The German Society of Orthodontics (DGKFO) also publishes in the journal important communications, statements and announcements.