葡萄砧木抗旱性的解剖生理生化过程

Liu Minmin, Yin Yonggang, J. Nan, Han Bin, Sun Yan, Liu Changjiang, Zhao Shengjian, Guo Yong, Guo Zijuan
{"title":"葡萄砧木抗旱性的解剖生理生化过程","authors":"Liu Minmin, Yin Yonggang, J. Nan, Han Bin, Sun Yan, Liu Changjiang, Zhao Shengjian, Guo Yong, Guo Zijuan","doi":"10.5073/VITIS.2021.60.53-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to explore the drought resistance mechanism of grape rootstocks, two grape rootstock species, '1103P' (a drought-tolerant rootstock) and '101-14M' (drought-sensitive), were treated with moderate water deficit (field capacity of 45-50 %). Throughout the experimental period, the leaves of '1103P' showed a higher stomatal conductance (gs), relative water content and photosynthetic rate (Pn) than '101-14M', indicating '1103P' was more resistant to tolerant than '101-14M'. We propose that '1103P' could prevent water loss from leaves under drought conditions based on the discoveries that '1103P' had higher leaf phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) content and leaf cuticular wax content, and smaller stomata aperture than those of '101-14M'. Additionally, the activities of H2O2-scavenging enzymes in leaves of '1103P' were higher than those of '101-14M' under drought conditions, indicating the lipid peroxidation induced by H2O2 of '1103P' was less serious than that of '101-14M'. Therefore, better water-saving and higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging abilities contributed together to stronger drought resistance of '1103P' than '101-14M'.","PeriodicalId":23613,"journal":{"name":"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical physiological and biochemical processes involved in grapevine rootstock drought tolerance\",\"authors\":\"Liu Minmin, Yin Yonggang, J. Nan, Han Bin, Sun Yan, Liu Changjiang, Zhao Shengjian, Guo Yong, Guo Zijuan\",\"doi\":\"10.5073/VITIS.2021.60.53-61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to explore the drought resistance mechanism of grape rootstocks, two grape rootstock species, '1103P' (a drought-tolerant rootstock) and '101-14M' (drought-sensitive), were treated with moderate water deficit (field capacity of 45-50 %). Throughout the experimental period, the leaves of '1103P' showed a higher stomatal conductance (gs), relative water content and photosynthetic rate (Pn) than '101-14M', indicating '1103P' was more resistant to tolerant than '101-14M'. We propose that '1103P' could prevent water loss from leaves under drought conditions based on the discoveries that '1103P' had higher leaf phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) content and leaf cuticular wax content, and smaller stomata aperture than those of '101-14M'. Additionally, the activities of H2O2-scavenging enzymes in leaves of '1103P' were higher than those of '101-14M' under drought conditions, indicating the lipid peroxidation induced by H2O2 of '1103P' was less serious than that of '101-14M'. Therefore, better water-saving and higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging abilities contributed together to stronger drought resistance of '1103P' than '101-14M'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"53-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5073/VITIS.2021.60.53-61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitis: Journal of Grapevine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5073/VITIS.2021.60.53-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为探讨葡萄砧木的抗旱机理,以‘1103P’(抗旱型砧木)和‘101-14M’(抗旱型砧木)两个品种为研究对象,进行了适度亏水处理(田间容量为45- 50%)。在整个试验期内,‘1103P’叶片气孔导度(gs)、相对含水量和光合速率(Pn)均高于‘101-14M’,表明‘1103P’比‘101-14M’更具抗性。我们发现‘1103P’具有较高的叶片激素ABA (abscisic acid, ABA)含量和叶片角质层蜡含量,气孔孔径比‘101-14M’小,因此我们认为‘1103P’在干旱条件下可以防止叶片水分流失。干旱条件下,‘1103P’叶片H2O2清除酶活性高于‘101-14M’,表明‘1103P’叶片H2O2诱导的脂质过氧化程度低于‘101-14M’。因此,‘1103P’比‘101-14M’具有更强的节水能力和更强的活性氧清除能力,共同促成了‘1103P’比‘101-14M’更强的抗旱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anatomical physiological and biochemical processes involved in grapevine rootstock drought tolerance
In order to explore the drought resistance mechanism of grape rootstocks, two grape rootstock species, '1103P' (a drought-tolerant rootstock) and '101-14M' (drought-sensitive), were treated with moderate water deficit (field capacity of 45-50 %). Throughout the experimental period, the leaves of '1103P' showed a higher stomatal conductance (gs), relative water content and photosynthetic rate (Pn) than '101-14M', indicating '1103P' was more resistant to tolerant than '101-14M'. We propose that '1103P' could prevent water loss from leaves under drought conditions based on the discoveries that '1103P' had higher leaf phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) content and leaf cuticular wax content, and smaller stomata aperture than those of '101-14M'. Additionally, the activities of H2O2-scavenging enzymes in leaves of '1103P' were higher than those of '101-14M' under drought conditions, indicating the lipid peroxidation induced by H2O2 of '1103P' was less serious than that of '101-14M'. Therefore, better water-saving and higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging abilities contributed together to stronger drought resistance of '1103P' than '101-14M'.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信