大流行中有组织的不负责任和风险社区

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Pichlak
{"title":"大流行中有组织的不负责任和风险社区","authors":"M. Pichlak","doi":"10.25162/arsp-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines challenges that the global COVID-19 pandemic has created for responsibility frameworks and practices in law. Building on Ulrich Beck's account of the risk society, it argues that the basic qualities of COVID-19 related risks, when juxtaposed with the standard legal framework for responsibility, result in organised irresponsibility in law (OI). Also the most common legal response to current problems, namely liability shields and waivers, contribute to OI. As a result, the paper presents the case for the metamorphosis of the current responsibility framework. Conceptually speaking, the metamorphosis should be based on the commonality of risk experience - on 'shared risk communities'. Possible normative ('common but differentiated responsibility' principle) and institutional consequences (alternative compensation programmes) are discussed in terms of their potential to contribute to metamorphosis. © Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2022.","PeriodicalId":41477,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","volume":"725 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organized Irresponsibility and Communities of Risk in a Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"M. Pichlak\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/arsp-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper examines challenges that the global COVID-19 pandemic has created for responsibility frameworks and practices in law. Building on Ulrich Beck's account of the risk society, it argues that the basic qualities of COVID-19 related risks, when juxtaposed with the standard legal framework for responsibility, result in organised irresponsibility in law (OI). Also the most common legal response to current problems, namely liability shields and waivers, contribute to OI. As a result, the paper presents the case for the metamorphosis of the current responsibility framework. Conceptually speaking, the metamorphosis should be based on the commonality of risk experience - on 'shared risk communities'. Possible normative ('common but differentiated responsibility' principle) and institutional consequences (alternative compensation programmes) are discussed in terms of their potential to contribute to metamorphosis. © Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2022.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie\",\"volume\":\"725 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了2019冠状病毒病全球大流行给法律责任框架和实践带来的挑战。在乌尔里希·贝克(Ulrich Beck)对风险社会的描述的基础上,报告认为,与COVID-19相关的风险的基本特征,与责任的标准法律框架并列,会导致有组织的法律不负责任(OI)。此外,对当前问题最常见的法律回应,即责任保护和免责,也会导致OI。因此,本文提出了当前责任框架蜕变的案例。从概念上讲,这种转变应该基于风险经验的共性——“共同风险社区”。可能的规范(“共同但有区别的责任”原则)和制度后果(替代补偿方案)根据其促进变态的潜力进行了讨论。©Franz Steiner Verlag,斯图加特2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organized Irresponsibility and Communities of Risk in a Pandemic
The paper examines challenges that the global COVID-19 pandemic has created for responsibility frameworks and practices in law. Building on Ulrich Beck's account of the risk society, it argues that the basic qualities of COVID-19 related risks, when juxtaposed with the standard legal framework for responsibility, result in organised irresponsibility in law (OI). Also the most common legal response to current problems, namely liability shields and waivers, contribute to OI. As a result, the paper presents the case for the metamorphosis of the current responsibility framework. Conceptually speaking, the metamorphosis should be based on the commonality of risk experience - on 'shared risk communities'. Possible normative ('common but differentiated responsibility' principle) and institutional consequences (alternative compensation programmes) are discussed in terms of their potential to contribute to metamorphosis. © Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2022.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信