第三章:陷阱和实用性

M. Levin, D. Spence
{"title":"第三章:陷阱和实用性","authors":"M. Levin, D. Spence","doi":"10.1080/08940630.1989.10466503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct regulation mandating control, cleanup and other requirements for what used to be known as \"industrial waste\" imposes heavy enough burdens. But the limitations of such chemical-by-chemical or wastestream by waste-stream approaches—cumbersome rulemaking, lack of knowledge of feasible control technologies, and the resources required to regulate hundreds of individual substances or production processes— are becoming increasingly obvious to citizens and regulatory agencies. Through public referenda, results like Proposition 65 in California, and statutory worker- protection or right-to-know provisions, the toxics world is shifting toward public disclosure of hazardous substances or releases as a way to address whole clusters of perceived environmental risks at once. SARA Title III is a prime example of such a \"nonregulatory\" approach to third-generation environmental problems. It illustrates the trend toward this kind of approach, as well as its impact and the issues that are raised. It also illustrates...","PeriodicalId":17188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARA Title III: Pitfalls and Practicalities\",\"authors\":\"M. Levin, D. Spence\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08940630.1989.10466503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Direct regulation mandating control, cleanup and other requirements for what used to be known as \\\"industrial waste\\\" imposes heavy enough burdens. But the limitations of such chemical-by-chemical or wastestream by waste-stream approaches—cumbersome rulemaking, lack of knowledge of feasible control technologies, and the resources required to regulate hundreds of individual substances or production processes— are becoming increasingly obvious to citizens and regulatory agencies. Through public referenda, results like Proposition 65 in California, and statutory worker- protection or right-to-know provisions, the toxics world is shifting toward public disclosure of hazardous substances or releases as a way to address whole clusters of perceived environmental risks at once. SARA Title III is a prime example of such a \\\"nonregulatory\\\" approach to third-generation environmental problems. It illustrates the trend toward this kind of approach, as well as its impact and the issues that are raised. It also illustrates...\",\"PeriodicalId\":17188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1989.10466503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08940630.1989.10466503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对过去被称为“工业废物”的直接管制、清理和其他要求施加了足够沉重的负担。但是,这种逐个化学品或逐个废物处理方法的局限性——繁琐的规则制定、缺乏对可行控制技术的了解以及管理数百种单独物质或生产过程所需的资源——对公民和管理机构来说正变得越来越明显。通过公众投票,加州65号提案的结果,以及法定的工人保护或知情权条款,有毒物质世界正在转向公开披露有害物质或排放,以此作为一种立即解决所有已知环境风险的方法。SARA第三章是这种“非管制”方法解决第三代环境问题的一个主要例子。它说明了这种方法的趋势,以及它的影响和提出的问题。这也说明了……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SARA Title III: Pitfalls and Practicalities
Direct regulation mandating control, cleanup and other requirements for what used to be known as "industrial waste" imposes heavy enough burdens. But the limitations of such chemical-by-chemical or wastestream by waste-stream approaches—cumbersome rulemaking, lack of knowledge of feasible control technologies, and the resources required to regulate hundreds of individual substances or production processes— are becoming increasingly obvious to citizens and regulatory agencies. Through public referenda, results like Proposition 65 in California, and statutory worker- protection or right-to-know provisions, the toxics world is shifting toward public disclosure of hazardous substances or releases as a way to address whole clusters of perceived environmental risks at once. SARA Title III is a prime example of such a "nonregulatory" approach to third-generation environmental problems. It illustrates the trend toward this kind of approach, as well as its impact and the issues that are raised. It also illustrates...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信