伊朗、加拿大、美国本科护理课程认证模式比较

N. Rajai, M. Nezamzadeh, E. Abadi, I. Jafari Iraqi, Z. Vafadar
{"title":"伊朗、加拿大、美国本科护理课程认证模式比较","authors":"N. Rajai, M. Nezamzadeh, E. Abadi, I. Jafari Iraqi, Z. Vafadar","doi":"10.18502/jmed.v17i1.9747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Accreditation is one of the most important tools to improve the quality of education in nursing. This study has made a comparative comparison of the accreditation model of the Bachelor of Nursing training program in Iran, Canada and the United States. \nMethods: A descriptive and comparative study was conducted in 2021. keywords like \"accreditation\", \"undergraduate nursing\", \"educational program or curriculum\", \"Canada\", \"Iran\", and \"America\" were searched in Persian and English via relevant sites and the Bereday model in 4 stages of description, interpretation, proximity, and comparison was used for comparative comparison. \nResults: Accreditation in the Iranian model is more focused on managerial, structural and administrative standards. In the American model, it focuses on global developments in the field of health, providing educational programs with intercultural and transnational perspectives, interprofessional cooperation, distance education, evaluating learning outcomes and using its results in the development of education. The Canadian model focuses on participatory management, inspirational leadership, development of nursing professional competencies tailored to community health needs, team care in various areas of prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, interprofessional training, independence and freedom of action in budgeting for faculty members. \nConclusion: Between the three study models, the Canadian and American models totaly specializes in nursing, and of course the Canadian model is more comprehensive, and since there are no specific accreditation standards for nursing in Iran, these two programs can be used as a suitable model to be taken.","PeriodicalId":30509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Comparison of Accreditation Model of Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum in Iran, Canada and the United States\",\"authors\":\"N. Rajai, M. Nezamzadeh, E. Abadi, I. Jafari Iraqi, Z. Vafadar\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jmed.v17i1.9747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Accreditation is one of the most important tools to improve the quality of education in nursing. This study has made a comparative comparison of the accreditation model of the Bachelor of Nursing training program in Iran, Canada and the United States. \\nMethods: A descriptive and comparative study was conducted in 2021. keywords like \\\"accreditation\\\", \\\"undergraduate nursing\\\", \\\"educational program or curriculum\\\", \\\"Canada\\\", \\\"Iran\\\", and \\\"America\\\" were searched in Persian and English via relevant sites and the Bereday model in 4 stages of description, interpretation, proximity, and comparison was used for comparative comparison. \\nResults: Accreditation in the Iranian model is more focused on managerial, structural and administrative standards. In the American model, it focuses on global developments in the field of health, providing educational programs with intercultural and transnational perspectives, interprofessional cooperation, distance education, evaluating learning outcomes and using its results in the development of education. The Canadian model focuses on participatory management, inspirational leadership, development of nursing professional competencies tailored to community health needs, team care in various areas of prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, interprofessional training, independence and freedom of action in budgeting for faculty members. \\nConclusion: Between the three study models, the Canadian and American models totaly specializes in nursing, and of course the Canadian model is more comprehensive, and since there are no specific accreditation standards for nursing in Iran, these two programs can be used as a suitable model to be taken.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v17i1.9747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jmed.v17i1.9747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:认证是提高护理教育质量的重要手段之一。本研究对伊朗、加拿大和美国护理学士学位培训项目的认证模式进行了比较。方法:于2021年进行描述性和比较性研究。通过相关网站对“认证”、“本科护理”、“教育项目或课程”、“加拿大”、“伊朗”、“美国”等关键词进行波斯语和英语搜索,采用描述、解释、接近、比较4个阶段的Bereday模型进行比较比较。结果:伊朗模式的认证更侧重于管理、结构和行政标准。在美国模式中,它侧重于卫生领域的全球发展,提供具有跨文化和跨国视角的教育方案,跨专业合作,远程教育,评估学习成果并将其成果用于教育发展。加拿大模式侧重于参与式管理、鼓舞人心的领导、根据社区卫生需要发展护理专业能力、预防、治疗和康复等各个领域的团队护理、跨专业培训、教员预算编制方面的独立和行动自由。结论:在三种学习模式中,加拿大和美国的模式完全专注于护理,当然加拿大模式更全面,由于伊朗没有具体的护理认证标准,这两个项目可以作为合适的学习模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Comparison of Accreditation Model of Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum in Iran, Canada and the United States
Introduction: Accreditation is one of the most important tools to improve the quality of education in nursing. This study has made a comparative comparison of the accreditation model of the Bachelor of Nursing training program in Iran, Canada and the United States. Methods: A descriptive and comparative study was conducted in 2021. keywords like "accreditation", "undergraduate nursing", "educational program or curriculum", "Canada", "Iran", and "America" were searched in Persian and English via relevant sites and the Bereday model in 4 stages of description, interpretation, proximity, and comparison was used for comparative comparison. Results: Accreditation in the Iranian model is more focused on managerial, structural and administrative standards. In the American model, it focuses on global developments in the field of health, providing educational programs with intercultural and transnational perspectives, interprofessional cooperation, distance education, evaluating learning outcomes and using its results in the development of education. The Canadian model focuses on participatory management, inspirational leadership, development of nursing professional competencies tailored to community health needs, team care in various areas of prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, interprofessional training, independence and freedom of action in budgeting for faculty members. Conclusion: Between the three study models, the Canadian and American models totaly specializes in nursing, and of course the Canadian model is more comprehensive, and since there are no specific accreditation standards for nursing in Iran, these two programs can be used as a suitable model to be taken.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信