评估与支持小学生自主学习之工具概述

Q2 Social Sciences
Marika Koivuniemi, H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä, V. Thomas
{"title":"评估与支持小学生自主学习之工具概述","authors":"Marika Koivuniemi, H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä, V. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/23735082.2020.1859123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study summarises existing instruments for measuring and supporting self-regulated learning (SRL) in schools using articles from the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. We analyse how the instruments address cognition, motivation or emotions as a target for regulation and whether they acknowledge the phase of SRL (forethought, performance or reflection) that is used. The results show that the instruments accurately specified the SRL target/s, although the regulation phase was specified only 32.7% of the time. Moreover, the SRL assessment instruments measured students’ cognition and motivation, whereas support focused only on cognitive processes. If SRL instruments are intended for future pedagogical use, supports that explicitly target motivation and emotion and acknowledge the differences between SRL phases should be designed.","PeriodicalId":52244,"journal":{"name":"Learning: Research and Practice","volume":"47 1","pages":"109 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An overview of instruments for assessing and supporting elementary school students’ self-regulated learning\",\"authors\":\"Marika Koivuniemi, H. Järvenoja, Sanna Järvelä, V. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23735082.2020.1859123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study summarises existing instruments for measuring and supporting self-regulated learning (SRL) in schools using articles from the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. We analyse how the instruments address cognition, motivation or emotions as a target for regulation and whether they acknowledge the phase of SRL (forethought, performance or reflection) that is used. The results show that the instruments accurately specified the SRL target/s, although the regulation phase was specified only 32.7% of the time. Moreover, the SRL assessment instruments measured students’ cognition and motivation, whereas support focused only on cognitive processes. If SRL instruments are intended for future pedagogical use, supports that explicitly target motivation and emotion and acknowledge the differences between SRL phases should be designed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning: Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning: Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1859123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning: Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1859123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究利用SCOPUS和Web of Science数据库中的文章,总结了现有的用于衡量和支持学校自主学习(SRL)的工具。我们分析了这些工具如何将认知、动机或情绪作为调节的目标,以及它们是否承认所使用的SRL阶段(预见、表现或反思)。结果表明,仪器准确地指定了SRL目标/秒,但调节阶段仅占32.7%。此外,SRL评估工具测量学生的认知和动机,而支持只关注认知过程。如果SRL工具打算用于未来的教学用途,那么应该设计明确针对动机和情感的支持,并承认SRL阶段之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An overview of instruments for assessing and supporting elementary school students’ self-regulated learning
ABSTRACT This study summarises existing instruments for measuring and supporting self-regulated learning (SRL) in schools using articles from the SCOPUS and Web of Science databases. We analyse how the instruments address cognition, motivation or emotions as a target for regulation and whether they acknowledge the phase of SRL (forethought, performance or reflection) that is used. The results show that the instruments accurately specified the SRL target/s, although the regulation phase was specified only 32.7% of the time. Moreover, the SRL assessment instruments measured students’ cognition and motivation, whereas support focused only on cognitive processes. If SRL instruments are intended for future pedagogical use, supports that explicitly target motivation and emotion and acknowledge the differences between SRL phases should be designed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning: Research and Practice
Learning: Research and Practice Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信