安娜·科米内的历史方法论:以《alexias》第十二卷第三章为例*

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Koichi Inoue
{"title":"安娜·科米内的历史方法论:以《alexias》第十二卷第三章为例*","authors":"Koichi Inoue","doi":"10.2298/ZRVI1552195I","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine Anna Komnene’s editorial procedure in Book XII chapter 3 of the Alexias and reappraise her historical methodology. We investigate the two dates at the end of XII.3.1, which are incompatible: the indiction does not correspond to the regnal year. Our investigations come to the following conclusions: Anna composes XII.3 using reliable sources, Alexios I’s official letters and court logbook; both of the dates originate in the trustworthy imperial documents that she consulted; the discrepancy between the two, commonly regarded as a mistake made by Anna, was caused by editorial work on the text after her death. As far as we can tell from XII.3, her method of historical composition is entirely clear and this suggests that the Alexias is a reliable historical source.","PeriodicalId":53859,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta","volume":"1 1","pages":"195-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY OF ANNA KOMNENE: A CASE STUDY OF BOOK XII CHAPTER 3 OF THE ALEXIAS*\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/ZRVI1552195I\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we examine Anna Komnene’s editorial procedure in Book XII chapter 3 of the Alexias and reappraise her historical methodology. We investigate the two dates at the end of XII.3.1, which are incompatible: the indiction does not correspond to the regnal year. Our investigations come to the following conclusions: Anna composes XII.3 using reliable sources, Alexios I’s official letters and court logbook; both of the dates originate in the trustworthy imperial documents that she consulted; the discrepancy between the two, commonly regarded as a mistake made by Anna, was caused by editorial work on the text after her death. As far as we can tell from XII.3, her method of historical composition is entirely clear and this suggests that the Alexias is a reliable historical source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"195-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/ZRVI1552195I\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/ZRVI1552195I","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了安娜·科米内在《亚历克西斯记》第十二卷第三章中的编辑过程,并重新评价了她的历史方法论。我们调查了12 .3.1末尾的两个日期,这两个日期是不相容的:指示不符合正常年份。我们的调查得出以下结论:安娜使用可靠的来源,阿历克修斯一世的官方信件和法庭日志撰写XII.3;这两个日期都源于她查阅的可靠的皇家文件;这两者之间的差异,通常被认为是安娜犯的一个错误,是她死后对文本的编辑工作造成的。据我们所知,从12 .3,她的历史组成方法是完全清楚的,这表明亚历克西亚斯是一个可靠的历史来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY OF ANNA KOMNENE: A CASE STUDY OF BOOK XII CHAPTER 3 OF THE ALEXIAS*
In this paper we examine Anna Komnene’s editorial procedure in Book XII chapter 3 of the Alexias and reappraise her historical methodology. We investigate the two dates at the end of XII.3.1, which are incompatible: the indiction does not correspond to the regnal year. Our investigations come to the following conclusions: Anna composes XII.3 using reliable sources, Alexios I’s official letters and court logbook; both of the dates originate in the trustworthy imperial documents that she consulted; the discrepancy between the two, commonly regarded as a mistake made by Anna, was caused by editorial work on the text after her death. As far as we can tell from XII.3, her method of historical composition is entirely clear and this suggests that the Alexias is a reliable historical source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta
Zbornik Radova Vizantoloskog Instituta MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信