从期望效用理论到前景理论:四十年后的实验路径追寻

IF 0.7 Q4 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
S. Kalinowski
{"title":"从期望效用理论到前景理论:四十年后的实验路径追寻","authors":"S. Kalinowski","doi":"10.37190/ORD200403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The expected utility theory axioms have been studied experimentally. Three of the experiments are a repetition of an earlier test in slightly changed circumstances, while the other two are original. The participants were incentivised with rewards, which did not happen in the replicated tests. The results confirmed the degeneration of the expected utility theory as a scientific research program. The evidence that resulted from the tests supported the hypothesis on the cumulative prospect theory predicting facts not forecasted by the EUT.","PeriodicalId":43244,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research and Decisions","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From expected utility theory to prospect theory: tracking down the experimental path after forty years\",\"authors\":\"S. Kalinowski\",\"doi\":\"10.37190/ORD200403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The expected utility theory axioms have been studied experimentally. Three of the experiments are a repetition of an earlier test in slightly changed circumstances, while the other two are original. The participants were incentivised with rewards, which did not happen in the replicated tests. The results confirmed the degeneration of the expected utility theory as a scientific research program. The evidence that resulted from the tests supported the hypothesis on the cumulative prospect theory predicting facts not forecasted by the EUT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research and Decisions\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research and Decisions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37190/ORD200403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research and Decisions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/ORD200403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对期望效用理论公理进行了实验研究。其中三个实验是在略有变化的环境下重复先前的测试,而另外两个是原始的。参与者受到奖励的激励,这在重复测试中没有发生。结果证实了期望效用理论作为一种科学研究方案的退化。从测试中得到的证据支持了累积前景理论的假设,该理论预测了EUT无法预测的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From expected utility theory to prospect theory: tracking down the experimental path after forty years
The expected utility theory axioms have been studied experimentally. Three of the experiments are a repetition of an earlier test in slightly changed circumstances, while the other two are original. The participants were incentivised with rewards, which did not happen in the replicated tests. The results confirmed the degeneration of the expected utility theory as a scientific research program. The evidence that resulted from the tests supported the hypothesis on the cumulative prospect theory predicting facts not forecasted by the EUT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research and Decisions
Operations Research and Decisions OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信