可靠的采建分析在采建损害赔偿中的作用

W. Kocot
{"title":"可靠的采建分析在采建损害赔偿中的作用","authors":"W. Kocot","doi":"10.35784/bud-arch.2644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basis for recognising claims for mining damage to a structure should be a mining and construction analysis, carried out following a detailed visual inspection of the damage and the results of surface deformation measurements. It allows to establish a cause and effect relation between the activity of the mining company and the damage. Unfortunately, there are cases when such an analysis is omitted and the following scheme is used: \"since there is damage and the object is located in a mining area, it is mining damage\". The problem is illustrated by two court cases where the author acted as an expert witness. Both cases are examples of the so-called pseudo-mining damage and confirm the thesis that the mere image of damage without professional analysis of construction and mining factors may lead to wrong conclusions regarding the causes of the damage.","PeriodicalId":55831,"journal":{"name":"Budownictwo i Architektura","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of reliable mining and construction analysis in adjudicating mining damage claims\",\"authors\":\"W. Kocot\",\"doi\":\"10.35784/bud-arch.2644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The basis for recognising claims for mining damage to a structure should be a mining and construction analysis, carried out following a detailed visual inspection of the damage and the results of surface deformation measurements. It allows to establish a cause and effect relation between the activity of the mining company and the damage. Unfortunately, there are cases when such an analysis is omitted and the following scheme is used: \\\"since there is damage and the object is located in a mining area, it is mining damage\\\". The problem is illustrated by two court cases where the author acted as an expert witness. Both cases are examples of the so-called pseudo-mining damage and confirm the thesis that the mere image of damage without professional analysis of construction and mining factors may lead to wrong conclusions regarding the causes of the damage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Budownictwo i Architektura\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Budownictwo i Architektura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.2644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Budownictwo i Architektura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.2644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确认采矿对结构的损害索赔的基础应该是在对损害进行详细的目视检查和表面变形测量结果之后进行采矿和施工分析。它允许在矿业公司的活动和损害之间建立因果关系。不幸的是,在某些情况下,这种分析被省略,而使用以下方案:“由于存在损害,并且该对象位于矿区,因此它是采矿损害”。撰文人担任专家证人的两个法庭案件说明了这个问题。这两个案例都是所谓的伪采矿损害的例子,并证实了一个论点,即在没有对建筑和采矿因素进行专业分析的情况下,仅仅是损害的形象可能导致对损害原因的错误结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of reliable mining and construction analysis in adjudicating mining damage claims
The basis for recognising claims for mining damage to a structure should be a mining and construction analysis, carried out following a detailed visual inspection of the damage and the results of surface deformation measurements. It allows to establish a cause and effect relation between the activity of the mining company and the damage. Unfortunately, there are cases when such an analysis is omitted and the following scheme is used: "since there is damage and the object is located in a mining area, it is mining damage". The problem is illustrated by two court cases where the author acted as an expert witness. Both cases are examples of the so-called pseudo-mining damage and confirm the thesis that the mere image of damage without professional analysis of construction and mining factors may lead to wrong conclusions regarding the causes of the damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信