布科维纳学生大腿长度的动态比较

Karatieieva Svitlana, Yuriyivna Каратєєва, Світлана Юріївна
{"title":"布科维纳学生大腿长度的动态比较","authors":"Karatieieva Svitlana, Yuriyivna Каратєєва, Світлана Юріївна","doi":"10.29254/2077-4214-2023-2-169-424-431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A paired t-test (paired-samples t-test) was performed to compare the respondents' indicators during the first and second measurements a year later. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the licensed program RStudio. When testing the hypothesis that the average value of the length of the right thigh significantly increased, a significant increase in the length of the right thigh was found between the first (M=53.870, SD=4.098) and the second (M=54.319, SD=4.118) measurements; t(68)= -6.704, p<0.001. The average value of the length of the left thigh also increased significantly, and there was a significant increase in the length of the left thigh between the first (M=53.855, SD=4.237) and the second (M=54.478, SD=4.161) measurements; t(68)= -5.328, p<0.001. A comparison of the length of the thigh in the dynamics after a year; in student-athletes of the main group showed a difference in the increase of the length of the thigh in 2022 compared to 2021 (±0.48-0.62 cm). According to the comparison of the left and right thigh during the second measurement of student-athletes, no significant difference in the average length of the right and left thigh was found (right – 54.31±2.04 cm, left – 54.47±2.04 cm). A significant predictor of thigh length is height. A model was derived for predicting the length of the right thigh Lr = 0.308 h and the left Ll = 0.309 h, where L is the length of the thigh, h is height. The coefficient of determination is 99.8%.","PeriodicalId":9360,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DYNAMIC COMPARISON THE THIGH LENGTH IN STUDENTS OF BUKOVYNA\",\"authors\":\"Karatieieva Svitlana, Yuriyivna Каратєєва, Світлана Юріївна\",\"doi\":\"10.29254/2077-4214-2023-2-169-424-431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A paired t-test (paired-samples t-test) was performed to compare the respondents' indicators during the first and second measurements a year later. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the licensed program RStudio. When testing the hypothesis that the average value of the length of the right thigh significantly increased, a significant increase in the length of the right thigh was found between the first (M=53.870, SD=4.098) and the second (M=54.319, SD=4.118) measurements; t(68)= -6.704, p<0.001. The average value of the length of the left thigh also increased significantly, and there was a significant increase in the length of the left thigh between the first (M=53.855, SD=4.237) and the second (M=54.478, SD=4.161) measurements; t(68)= -5.328, p<0.001. A comparison of the length of the thigh in the dynamics after a year; in student-athletes of the main group showed a difference in the increase of the length of the thigh in 2022 compared to 2021 (±0.48-0.62 cm). According to the comparison of the left and right thigh during the second measurement of student-athletes, no significant difference in the average length of the right and left thigh was found (right – 54.31±2.04 cm, left – 54.47±2.04 cm). A significant predictor of thigh length is height. A model was derived for predicting the length of the right thigh Lr = 0.308 h and the left Ll = 0.309 h, where L is the length of the thigh, h is height. The coefficient of determination is 99.8%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2023-2-169-424-431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Problems Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2023-2-169-424-431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一年后的第一次和第二次测量中,进行配对t检验(配对样本t检验)来比较受访者的指标。使用授权程序RStudio对获得的数据进行统计分析。在检验右大腿长度平均值显著增加的假设时,第一次测量结果(M=53.870, SD=4.098)与第二次测量结果(M=54.319, SD=4.118)发现右大腿长度显著增加;T (68)= -6.704, p<0.001。左大腿长度的平均值也明显增加,第一次测量(M=53.855, SD=4.237)与第二次测量(M=54.478, SD=4.161)相比,左大腿长度明显增加;T (68)= -5.328, p<0.001。对比一年后大腿长度的动态变化;主力组学生运动员的大腿长度在2022年与2021年的增幅有差异(±0.48-0.62 cm)。第二次测量时,对学生运动员的左右大腿进行比较,发现左右大腿平均长度无显著差异(右- 54.31±2.04 cm,左- 54.47±2.04 cm)。大腿长度的一个重要预测指标是身高。推导出右大腿长度Lr = 0.308 h,左大腿长度Ll = 0.309 h的预测模型,其中L为大腿长度,h为大腿高度。测定系数为99.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DYNAMIC COMPARISON THE THIGH LENGTH IN STUDENTS OF BUKOVYNA
A paired t-test (paired-samples t-test) was performed to compare the respondents' indicators during the first and second measurements a year later. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was carried out using the licensed program RStudio. When testing the hypothesis that the average value of the length of the right thigh significantly increased, a significant increase in the length of the right thigh was found between the first (M=53.870, SD=4.098) and the second (M=54.319, SD=4.118) measurements; t(68)= -6.704, p<0.001. The average value of the length of the left thigh also increased significantly, and there was a significant increase in the length of the left thigh between the first (M=53.855, SD=4.237) and the second (M=54.478, SD=4.161) measurements; t(68)= -5.328, p<0.001. A comparison of the length of the thigh in the dynamics after a year; in student-athletes of the main group showed a difference in the increase of the length of the thigh in 2022 compared to 2021 (±0.48-0.62 cm). According to the comparison of the left and right thigh during the second measurement of student-athletes, no significant difference in the average length of the right and left thigh was found (right – 54.31±2.04 cm, left – 54.47±2.04 cm). A significant predictor of thigh length is height. A model was derived for predicting the length of the right thigh Lr = 0.308 h and the left Ll = 0.309 h, where L is the length of the thigh, h is height. The coefficient of determination is 99.8%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信