Cristiano de Oliveira Cardoso, Clacir Staudt, Aldo Fernando Somavilla Duarte, La Hore Correa Rodrigues, Cristiane Cauduro Lima, Vasco Morosini Miller
{"title":"西罗莫司洗脱混合支架或依维莫司洗脱支架治疗患者的早期和晚期结果","authors":"Cristiano de Oliveira Cardoso, Clacir Staudt, Aldo Fernando Somavilla Duarte, La Hore Correa Rodrigues, Cristiane Cauduro Lima, Vasco Morosini Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Orsiro is a hybrid stent which has passive (amorphous silicon carbide) and active (poly‐L‐lactic acid, PLLA) coatings. The first layer encapsulates the stent struts, promoting lower local inflammation, whereas the second layer releases sirolimus through a biodegradable matrix. This study's aim was to compare the results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents (everolimus‐eluting stent) in daily clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational study in which patients were divided into two groups: those who received only one or more Orsiro stents, and those who received only Xience<sup>TM</sup> V stents. Early and late outcomes were prospectively collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between September 2012 and March 2014, this study included 92 and 108 patients treated with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents, respectively. Clinical, angiographic, and procedure characteristics were mostly similar between groups. Rates of procedure success (98.9% vs. 95.4%; <em>p =</em> 0.22), in‐hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 0%; <em>p =</em> 0.40) and stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%, <em>p =</em> 0.30) did not differ between groups. Time of follow‐up was 434 ± 111 and 477 ± 66 days (<em>p =</em> 0.23), respectively, and differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 0%, <em>p =</em> 0.30), stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%; <em>p =</em> 0.30), or need for repeat revascularization of the target lesion (0% vs. 0.9%; <em>p =</em> 0.30) were not observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Orsiro and Xience™ V stents showed similar performance, with low rates of early and late clinical and angiographic events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101093,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 114-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resultados iniciais e tardios de pacientes tratados com stent híbrido eluidor de sirolimus ou stent eluidor de everolimus\",\"authors\":\"Cristiano de Oliveira Cardoso, Clacir Staudt, Aldo Fernando Somavilla Duarte, La Hore Correa Rodrigues, Cristiane Cauduro Lima, Vasco Morosini Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Orsiro is a hybrid stent which has passive (amorphous silicon carbide) and active (poly‐L‐lactic acid, PLLA) coatings. The first layer encapsulates the stent struts, promoting lower local inflammation, whereas the second layer releases sirolimus through a biodegradable matrix. This study's aim was to compare the results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents (everolimus‐eluting stent) in daily clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational study in which patients were divided into two groups: those who received only one or more Orsiro stents, and those who received only Xience<sup>TM</sup> V stents. Early and late outcomes were prospectively collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between September 2012 and March 2014, this study included 92 and 108 patients treated with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents, respectively. Clinical, angiographic, and procedure characteristics were mostly similar between groups. Rates of procedure success (98.9% vs. 95.4%; <em>p =</em> 0.22), in‐hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 0%; <em>p =</em> 0.40) and stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%, <em>p =</em> 0.30) did not differ between groups. Time of follow‐up was 434 ± 111 and 477 ± 66 days (<em>p =</em> 0.23), respectively, and differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 0%, <em>p =</em> 0.30), stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%; <em>p =</em> 0.30), or need for repeat revascularization of the target lesion (0% vs. 0.9%; <em>p =</em> 0.30) were not observed.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Orsiro and Xience™ V stents showed similar performance, with low rates of early and late clinical and angiographic events.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 114-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbci.2015.12.009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104184315000417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cardiologia Invasiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104184315000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Orsiro是一种混合支架,具有被动(非晶碳化硅)和活性(聚L -乳酸,PLLA)涂层。第一层包裹支架支柱,促进局部炎症,而第二层通过可生物降解的基质释放西罗莫司。本研究的目的是比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与Orsiro和Xience™V支架(依维莫司洗脱支架)在日常临床实践中的效果。方法观察性研究,将患者分为两组:仅接受一个或多个Orsiro支架组和仅接受XienceTM V支架组。前瞻性地收集早期和晚期结果。结果2012年9月至2014年3月,该研究分别纳入92例和108例使用Orsiro和Xience™V支架的患者。两组患者的临床、血管造影和手术特征基本相似。手术成功率(98.9% vs. 95.4%;P = 0.22),住院死亡率(1.1% vs. 0%;P = 0.40)和支架血栓形成(0% vs 0.9%, P = 0.30)组间无差异。随访时间分别为434±111天和477±66天(p = 0.23),死亡率(0.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.30)、支架内血栓形成(0% vs. 0.9%;P = 0.30),或者需要对目标病变进行重复血运重建(0% vs. 0.9%;P = 0.30)未观察到。结论sorsiro和Xience™V支架表现相似,早期和晚期临床及血管造影事件发生率均较低。
Resultados iniciais e tardios de pacientes tratados com stent híbrido eluidor de sirolimus ou stent eluidor de everolimus
Background
The Orsiro is a hybrid stent which has passive (amorphous silicon carbide) and active (poly‐L‐lactic acid, PLLA) coatings. The first layer encapsulates the stent struts, promoting lower local inflammation, whereas the second layer releases sirolimus through a biodegradable matrix. This study's aim was to compare the results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents (everolimus‐eluting stent) in daily clinical practice.
Methods
Observational study in which patients were divided into two groups: those who received only one or more Orsiro stents, and those who received only XienceTM V stents. Early and late outcomes were prospectively collected.
Results
Between September 2012 and March 2014, this study included 92 and 108 patients treated with Orsiro and Xience™ V stents, respectively. Clinical, angiographic, and procedure characteristics were mostly similar between groups. Rates of procedure success (98.9% vs. 95.4%; p = 0.22), in‐hospital mortality (1.1% vs. 0%; p = 0.40) and stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.30) did not differ between groups. Time of follow‐up was 434 ± 111 and 477 ± 66 days (p = 0.23), respectively, and differences in mortality (0.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.30), stent thrombosis (0% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.30), or need for repeat revascularization of the target lesion (0% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.30) were not observed.
Conclusions
Orsiro and Xience™ V stents showed similar performance, with low rates of early and late clinical and angiographic events.