门诊精神病药房实践的最佳实践模型,第1部分:初始属性陈述的发展

R. Silvia, Kelly C. Lee, Gregory H Payne, J. Ho, C. Cobb, Elayne D Ansara, C. Ross
{"title":"门诊精神病药房实践的最佳实践模型,第1部分:初始属性陈述的发展","authors":"R. Silvia, Kelly C. Lee, Gregory H Payne, J. Ho, C. Cobb, Elayne D Ansara, C. Ross","doi":"10.9740/mhc.2022.04.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction A 2019 survey identified significant variability of practice characteristics among outpatient psychiatric pharmacists (OPPs). No published model establishes which attributes constitute best practice for OPPs. By developing a consensus for best practice model attributes, OPPs can work toward consistent, effective patient care. This project aimed to develop attribute statements for a best practice model for OPPs providing direct patient care. Methods Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists and American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) members were questioned using a 5-phase (P1-P5) survey and summit approach. The phases were: P1, broad ideation survey; P2, 10-person summit to develop draft statements; P3, survey of the draft statements for acceptance; P4, summit to resolve review feedback; and P5, survey of AAPP membership to confirm the finalized statements. Results P1 survey results generated a list of 143 possible attributes that informed the P2 summit, which were refined to 28 statements. P3 survey results confirmed at least 70% agreement with each statement. The P4 summit evaluated all P3 survey results and made significant modifications to 4 statements. Informal feedback was sought with other stakeholders, and supporting narratives and references were developed to provide clarity regarding the intent of each statement. Finalized statements and supporting narratives were confirmed in the P5 survey. Discussion The 28 attribute statements were developed over 18 months by gathering input and consensus through multiple modalities, including 3 surveys, 2 summit meetings, and numerous informal feedback requests. The agreement on the attribute statements was consistently high across all phases. The final attribute statements are presented elsewhere in this issue.","PeriodicalId":101313,"journal":{"name":"The mental health clinician","volume":"3 1","pages":"57 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practice model for outpatient psychiatric pharmacy practice, part 1: Development of initial attribute statements\",\"authors\":\"R. Silvia, Kelly C. Lee, Gregory H Payne, J. Ho, C. Cobb, Elayne D Ansara, C. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.9740/mhc.2022.04.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction A 2019 survey identified significant variability of practice characteristics among outpatient psychiatric pharmacists (OPPs). No published model establishes which attributes constitute best practice for OPPs. By developing a consensus for best practice model attributes, OPPs can work toward consistent, effective patient care. This project aimed to develop attribute statements for a best practice model for OPPs providing direct patient care. Methods Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists and American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) members were questioned using a 5-phase (P1-P5) survey and summit approach. The phases were: P1, broad ideation survey; P2, 10-person summit to develop draft statements; P3, survey of the draft statements for acceptance; P4, summit to resolve review feedback; and P5, survey of AAPP membership to confirm the finalized statements. Results P1 survey results generated a list of 143 possible attributes that informed the P2 summit, which were refined to 28 statements. P3 survey results confirmed at least 70% agreement with each statement. The P4 summit evaluated all P3 survey results and made significant modifications to 4 statements. Informal feedback was sought with other stakeholders, and supporting narratives and references were developed to provide clarity regarding the intent of each statement. Finalized statements and supporting narratives were confirmed in the P5 survey. Discussion The 28 attribute statements were developed over 18 months by gathering input and consensus through multiple modalities, including 3 surveys, 2 summit meetings, and numerous informal feedback requests. The agreement on the attribute statements was consistently high across all phases. The final attribute statements are presented elsewhere in this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The mental health clinician\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The mental health clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2022.04.057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The mental health clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2022.04.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2019年的一项调查发现,门诊精神科药剂师(opp)的执业特征存在显著差异。没有公开的模型确定哪些属性构成opp的最佳实践。通过对最佳实践模型属性达成共识,opp可以朝着一致、有效的患者护理方向努力。该项目旨在为opp提供直接患者护理的最佳实践模型开发属性声明。方法采用5阶段(P1-P5)调查法和顶峰法对美国精神病学药剂师协会(AAPP)成员和美国精神病学药剂师委员会(Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists)成员进行问卷调查。阶段为:1、广泛性思维调查;P2, 10人峰会制定声明草案;P3、验收声明草案的审查;P4、峰会解决评审反馈;P5,对AAPP成员进行调查,以确认最终声明。P1的调查结果生成了一个包含143个可能属性的列表,这些属性通知了P2峰会,这些属性被精炼为28个语句。P3调查结果证实至少70%的人同意每个说法。P4峰会评估了所有P3调查结果,并对4项陈述进行了重大修改。与其他利益相关者一起寻求非正式反馈,并制定了支持性叙述和参考资料,以明确每个陈述的意图。最终的陈述和支持叙述在P5调查中得到确认。28个属性声明是在18个月的时间里通过多种方式收集输入和共识而制定的,包括3次调查、2次峰会和大量非正式反馈请求。在所有阶段中,属性声明的一致性始终很高。最后的属性语句将在本期的其他地方给出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best practice model for outpatient psychiatric pharmacy practice, part 1: Development of initial attribute statements
Introduction A 2019 survey identified significant variability of practice characteristics among outpatient psychiatric pharmacists (OPPs). No published model establishes which attributes constitute best practice for OPPs. By developing a consensus for best practice model attributes, OPPs can work toward consistent, effective patient care. This project aimed to develop attribute statements for a best practice model for OPPs providing direct patient care. Methods Board Certified Psychiatric Pharmacists and American Association of Psychiatric Pharmacists (AAPP) members were questioned using a 5-phase (P1-P5) survey and summit approach. The phases were: P1, broad ideation survey; P2, 10-person summit to develop draft statements; P3, survey of the draft statements for acceptance; P4, summit to resolve review feedback; and P5, survey of AAPP membership to confirm the finalized statements. Results P1 survey results generated a list of 143 possible attributes that informed the P2 summit, which were refined to 28 statements. P3 survey results confirmed at least 70% agreement with each statement. The P4 summit evaluated all P3 survey results and made significant modifications to 4 statements. Informal feedback was sought with other stakeholders, and supporting narratives and references were developed to provide clarity regarding the intent of each statement. Finalized statements and supporting narratives were confirmed in the P5 survey. Discussion The 28 attribute statements were developed over 18 months by gathering input and consensus through multiple modalities, including 3 surveys, 2 summit meetings, and numerous informal feedback requests. The agreement on the attribute statements was consistently high across all phases. The final attribute statements are presented elsewhere in this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信