宾西法尼亚西南部水生龟(Chrysemys picta marginata和Chelydra serpentina serpentina)的人口统计学

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q4 PALEONTOLOGY
Daniel F. Hughes, W. Meshaka
{"title":"宾西法尼亚西南部水生龟(Chrysemys picta marginata和Chelydra serpentina serpentina)的人口统计学","authors":"Daniel F. Hughes, W. Meshaka","doi":"10.2992/007.086.0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Multi-year studies of syntopic species provide a spatiotemporal framework for comparing their demographic responses to the same environmental conditions. We used data derived from 15 years of sampling at an artificial pond matrix in southwestern Pennsylvania to investigate the survival, growth, and ages of Midland Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) and Common Snapping Turtles (Chelydra serpentina serpentina). We trapped turtles with baited hoop-nets at a primary wetland, which was the largest and deepest of five artificial ponds in a spatially aggregated matrix at the Powdermill Nature Reserve, a protected site in the Allegheny Mountains. We captured 81 Midland Painted Turtles 162 times, and 43 Common Snapping Turtles 136 times. For both species, apparent survival probabilities were higher for adults (range 79–95%) compared to juveniles (range 57–82%), and higher in females compared to males or juveniles. The average growth rate was highest in juvenile turtles of both species, indicating growth was maximal during periods of the lowest survival. Average growth rates, in general, were slower for Midland Painted Turtles compared to Common Snapping Turtles. Relating body size to age revealed estimates conforming to studies elsewhere and to longevity records based on known-age turtles. We interpret findings at this wetland matrix to represent the demographics of a deme within a fluid and dynamic regional network of demes for these two species and highlight the value of artificial pond networks to the conservation of freshwater turtle metapopulations in Pennsylvania.","PeriodicalId":50771,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Carnegie Museum","volume":"71 1","pages":"361 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demography of Aquatic Turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata and Chelydra serpentina serpentina) in Southwestern Pennsylvania\",\"authors\":\"Daniel F. Hughes, W. Meshaka\",\"doi\":\"10.2992/007.086.0402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Multi-year studies of syntopic species provide a spatiotemporal framework for comparing their demographic responses to the same environmental conditions. We used data derived from 15 years of sampling at an artificial pond matrix in southwestern Pennsylvania to investigate the survival, growth, and ages of Midland Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) and Common Snapping Turtles (Chelydra serpentina serpentina). We trapped turtles with baited hoop-nets at a primary wetland, which was the largest and deepest of five artificial ponds in a spatially aggregated matrix at the Powdermill Nature Reserve, a protected site in the Allegheny Mountains. We captured 81 Midland Painted Turtles 162 times, and 43 Common Snapping Turtles 136 times. For both species, apparent survival probabilities were higher for adults (range 79–95%) compared to juveniles (range 57–82%), and higher in females compared to males or juveniles. The average growth rate was highest in juvenile turtles of both species, indicating growth was maximal during periods of the lowest survival. Average growth rates, in general, were slower for Midland Painted Turtles compared to Common Snapping Turtles. Relating body size to age revealed estimates conforming to studies elsewhere and to longevity records based on known-age turtles. We interpret findings at this wetland matrix to represent the demographics of a deme within a fluid and dynamic regional network of demes for these two species and highlight the value of artificial pond networks to the conservation of freshwater turtle metapopulations in Pennsylvania.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Carnegie Museum\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"361 - 376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Carnegie Museum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2992/007.086.0402\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Carnegie Museum","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2992/007.086.0402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对合位物种的多年研究为比较它们对相同环境条件的人口反应提供了一个时空框架。在宾夕法尼亚州西南部的一个人工池塘基质中,我们使用了15年的采样数据来调查米德兰彩龟(Chrysemys picta marginata)和普通鳄龟(Chelydra serpentina serpentina)的生存、生长和年龄。在阿勒格尼山脉的粉碎机自然保护区(Powdermill Nature Reserve),我们用带饵的环网在一个主要湿地上捕捉海龟,这是一个空间聚集矩阵中五个人工池塘中最大最深的一个。共捕获米德兰彩龟81只162次,普通鳄龟43只136次。在这两个物种中,成虫(79-95%)的表观存活率高于幼虫(57-82%),雌虫的表观存活率高于雄虫或幼虫。两种幼龟的平均生长率均最高,说明在成活率最低的时期生长最快。一般来说,米德兰彩龟的平均生长速度比普通鳄龟慢。将体型与年龄联系起来,得出的估计值与其他地方的研究一致,也与基于已知年龄的海龟的寿命记录一致。我们对这个湿地矩阵的发现进行了解释,以代表这两个物种在一个流动和动态的区域网络中一个deme的人口统计数据,并强调了人工池塘网络对宾夕法尼亚州淡水龟超种群保护的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demography of Aquatic Turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata and Chelydra serpentina serpentina) in Southwestern Pennsylvania
ABSTRACT Multi-year studies of syntopic species provide a spatiotemporal framework for comparing their demographic responses to the same environmental conditions. We used data derived from 15 years of sampling at an artificial pond matrix in southwestern Pennsylvania to investigate the survival, growth, and ages of Midland Painted Turtles (Chrysemys picta marginata) and Common Snapping Turtles (Chelydra serpentina serpentina). We trapped turtles with baited hoop-nets at a primary wetland, which was the largest and deepest of five artificial ponds in a spatially aggregated matrix at the Powdermill Nature Reserve, a protected site in the Allegheny Mountains. We captured 81 Midland Painted Turtles 162 times, and 43 Common Snapping Turtles 136 times. For both species, apparent survival probabilities were higher for adults (range 79–95%) compared to juveniles (range 57–82%), and higher in females compared to males or juveniles. The average growth rate was highest in juvenile turtles of both species, indicating growth was maximal during periods of the lowest survival. Average growth rates, in general, were slower for Midland Painted Turtles compared to Common Snapping Turtles. Relating body size to age revealed estimates conforming to studies elsewhere and to longevity records based on known-age turtles. We interpret findings at this wetland matrix to represent the demographics of a deme within a fluid and dynamic regional network of demes for these two species and highlight the value of artificial pond networks to the conservation of freshwater turtle metapopulations in Pennsylvania.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Carnegie Museum
Annals of Carnegie Museum 综合性期刊-动物学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Carnegie Museum is a quarterly journal that publishes peer-reviewed short and medium-length original scientific contributions in organismal biology, earth sciences, and anthropology, in 40 by 52.5 pica format (168 by 220 mm or 6-5/8 by 8-5/8 inches). Subject matter must be relevant to Carnegie Museum of Natural History scientific sections or Powdermill Nature Reserve (PNR), preferably with connection to the Carnegie collection and/or personnel. Carnegie Museum staff and research associates receive publication priority, but others are encouraged to submit papers, especially those manuscripts explicitly based on the Carnegie collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信