一种新的M-TOPSIS方法与TOPSIS方法的比较分析

L. Ren, Yanqiong Zhang, Yiren Wang, Zhen-qiu Sun
{"title":"一种新的M-TOPSIS方法与TOPSIS方法的比较分析","authors":"L. Ren, Yanqiong Zhang, Yiren Wang, Zhen-qiu Sun","doi":"10.1093/AMRX/ABM005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we introduce a novel modified synthetic evaluation method (M-TOPSIS) based on the concept of original TOPSIS and calculate the distance between the alternatives and ‘optimized ideal reference point’ in the D D-plane. It could avoid rank reversals and solve the problem on evaluation failure that often occurs in original TOPSIS, so we believe that the mechanism of M-TOPSIS is more reasonable. Furthermore, the MTOPSIS method is simple in both concept and calculation procedures.","PeriodicalId":89656,"journal":{"name":"Applied mathematics research express : AMRX","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"126","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of a Novel M-TOPSIS Method and TOPSIS\",\"authors\":\"L. Ren, Yanqiong Zhang, Yiren Wang, Zhen-qiu Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/AMRX/ABM005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we introduce a novel modified synthetic evaluation method (M-TOPSIS) based on the concept of original TOPSIS and calculate the distance between the alternatives and ‘optimized ideal reference point’ in the D D-plane. It could avoid rank reversals and solve the problem on evaluation failure that often occurs in original TOPSIS, so we believe that the mechanism of M-TOPSIS is more reasonable. Furthermore, the MTOPSIS method is simple in both concept and calculation procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied mathematics research express : AMRX\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"126\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied mathematics research express : AMRX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/AMRX/ABM005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied mathematics research express : AMRX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AMRX/ABM005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 126

摘要

本文在原TOPSIS概念的基础上,引入了一种改进的综合评价方法M-TOPSIS,并计算了备选方案与D- D平面上“最优理想参考点”之间的距离。它可以避免秩反转,解决原有TOPSIS中经常出现的评价失败问题,因此我们认为M-TOPSIS的机制更为合理。此外,MTOPSIS方法在概念和计算过程上都很简单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of a Novel M-TOPSIS Method and TOPSIS
In this study, we introduce a novel modified synthetic evaluation method (M-TOPSIS) based on the concept of original TOPSIS and calculate the distance between the alternatives and ‘optimized ideal reference point’ in the D D-plane. It could avoid rank reversals and solve the problem on evaluation failure that often occurs in original TOPSIS, so we believe that the mechanism of M-TOPSIS is more reasonable. Furthermore, the MTOPSIS method is simple in both concept and calculation procedures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信