用权力谈判关系:用女性理论抵抗男性主义对女性主义的压力

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jocelyne Bartram Scott
{"title":"用权力谈判关系:用女性理论抵抗男性主义对女性主义的压力","authors":"Jocelyne Bartram Scott","doi":"10.1080/19419899.2021.1878470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Finding power within femininity, typically through masculinised dimensions of femininity, has long been a mechanism through which to recuperate feminised identities, experiences, and aesthetics within feminism. However, privileging powerfulness to the exclusion of dimensions of powerlessness, such as vulnerability, pathologizes femininity and maintains masculinism within feminism. Using queer femme autoethnography alongside intersectional feminist, femme, queer, and critical race theories, I demonstrate this tension surrounding how feminist feminine-of-centre folx negotiate masculinist pressures related to powerfulness and powerlessness in order to be considered properly feminist. I argue that continuing to prioritise powerfulness exclusively within feminism leaves little space for valuing femininized experiences, affects, and qualities, which are concomitant components of femininity. Ultimately, I conclude that the one-dimensional assertion that femininity is powerful, and only acceptable or potentially feminist when powerful, serves as a re-instantiation of a masculinist recuperation framework within feminism’s relationship to femininity. I assert that moving forward critical femininity studies should advocate for moving towards an acceptance framework regarding feminism and femininity in order to move beyond individualistic debates surrounding acceptable feminist femininities.","PeriodicalId":51686,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Sexuality","volume":"14 1","pages":"33 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating relationships with powerfulness: using femme theory to resist masculinist pressures on feminist femininities\",\"authors\":\"Jocelyne Bartram Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19419899.2021.1878470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Finding power within femininity, typically through masculinised dimensions of femininity, has long been a mechanism through which to recuperate feminised identities, experiences, and aesthetics within feminism. However, privileging powerfulness to the exclusion of dimensions of powerlessness, such as vulnerability, pathologizes femininity and maintains masculinism within feminism. Using queer femme autoethnography alongside intersectional feminist, femme, queer, and critical race theories, I demonstrate this tension surrounding how feminist feminine-of-centre folx negotiate masculinist pressures related to powerfulness and powerlessness in order to be considered properly feminist. I argue that continuing to prioritise powerfulness exclusively within feminism leaves little space for valuing femininized experiences, affects, and qualities, which are concomitant components of femininity. Ultimately, I conclude that the one-dimensional assertion that femininity is powerful, and only acceptable or potentially feminist when powerful, serves as a re-instantiation of a masculinist recuperation framework within feminism’s relationship to femininity. I assert that moving forward critical femininity studies should advocate for moving towards an acceptance framework regarding feminism and femininity in order to move beyond individualistic debates surrounding acceptable feminist femininities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1878470\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1878470","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在女性气质中寻找力量,通常是通过女性气质的男性化维度,长期以来一直是在女权主义中恢复女性化身份、经验和美学的一种机制。然而,特权的力量,排除无力的维度,如脆弱性,病态的女性气质,并保持男性主义在女权主义。利用酷儿女性自我民族志以及交叉的女权主义、女性、酷儿和批判种族理论,我展示了这种围绕女权主义女性中心folx如何协调与强大和无能相关的男性主义压力的紧张关系,以便被认为是适当的女权主义者。我认为,继续在女权主义中优先考虑力量,几乎没有空间去重视女性化的经历、影响和品质,这些都是女性气质的组成部分。最后,我得出的结论是,女性气质是强大的,只有在强大的时候才能被接受或潜在地女权主义,这种单向度的断言,可以作为女权主义与女性气质关系中男性主义恢复框架的重新例证。我断言,向前推进批判性女性研究应该倡导朝着一个关于女性主义和女性气质的接受框架发展,以超越围绕可接受的女性主义女性的个人主义辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negotiating relationships with powerfulness: using femme theory to resist masculinist pressures on feminist femininities
ABSTRACT Finding power within femininity, typically through masculinised dimensions of femininity, has long been a mechanism through which to recuperate feminised identities, experiences, and aesthetics within feminism. However, privileging powerfulness to the exclusion of dimensions of powerlessness, such as vulnerability, pathologizes femininity and maintains masculinism within feminism. Using queer femme autoethnography alongside intersectional feminist, femme, queer, and critical race theories, I demonstrate this tension surrounding how feminist feminine-of-centre folx negotiate masculinist pressures related to powerfulness and powerlessness in order to be considered properly feminist. I argue that continuing to prioritise powerfulness exclusively within feminism leaves little space for valuing femininized experiences, affects, and qualities, which are concomitant components of femininity. Ultimately, I conclude that the one-dimensional assertion that femininity is powerful, and only acceptable or potentially feminist when powerful, serves as a re-instantiation of a masculinist recuperation framework within feminism’s relationship to femininity. I assert that moving forward critical femininity studies should advocate for moving towards an acceptance framework regarding feminism and femininity in order to move beyond individualistic debates surrounding acceptable feminist femininities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology & Sexuality PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信