A. Limoeiro, A. H. Braitt, Alessandra Silveira Machado, C. Bueno, C. Fontana, L. Freire, R. Lopes, A. S. D. Martin
{"title":"三种不同热处理往复系统去除填充材料的微计算机断层扫描评价","authors":"A. Limoeiro, A. H. Braitt, Alessandra Silveira Machado, C. Bueno, C. Fontana, L. Freire, R. Lopes, A. S. D. Martin","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study compared the efficacy of three reciprocating systems with different heat treatments in removing obturator material from lower molar mesial canals. \nMethodology: The mesial canals of 18 lower molars were instrumented with ProTaper Next 25/0.06 and filled with gutta-percha and AHPlus. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=6) according to the system used to remove the filling material: Reciproc (REC R25), Reciproc Blue (RECB R25) and Wave One Primary (WO). The desobturation was considered complete when the working length was reached, and remnants of obturator material were no longer found in the instrument and also in the canal walls, observed through the dental operating microscope. \nResults: The results were analyzed using Biostat 4.0 software. Shapiro-Wilk and ANOVA (Tukey) tests with a significance level of 5% were applied. The volume of obturator material decreased in the cervical and middle thirds after the use of REC, RECB and WO systems (P .05). In the apical third, there was no significant reduction in the remaining obturator material independent of the operating system (P>.05). \nConclusions: REC, RECB and WO systems showed similarity in the removal of obturator material and were inefficient specifically in the apical third, showing the limitation of these systems in removing obturation material from curved canals.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Micro-computed tomography evaluation of filling material removal by three reciprocating systems with different thermal treatments\",\"authors\":\"A. Limoeiro, A. H. Braitt, Alessandra Silveira Machado, C. Bueno, C. Fontana, L. Freire, R. Lopes, A. S. D. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study compared the efficacy of three reciprocating systems with different heat treatments in removing obturator material from lower molar mesial canals. \\nMethodology: The mesial canals of 18 lower molars were instrumented with ProTaper Next 25/0.06 and filled with gutta-percha and AHPlus. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=6) according to the system used to remove the filling material: Reciproc (REC R25), Reciproc Blue (RECB R25) and Wave One Primary (WO). The desobturation was considered complete when the working length was reached, and remnants of obturator material were no longer found in the instrument and also in the canal walls, observed through the dental operating microscope. \\nResults: The results were analyzed using Biostat 4.0 software. Shapiro-Wilk and ANOVA (Tukey) tests with a significance level of 5% were applied. The volume of obturator material decreased in the cervical and middle thirds after the use of REC, RECB and WO systems (P .05). In the apical third, there was no significant reduction in the remaining obturator material independent of the operating system (P>.05). \\nConclusions: REC, RECB and WO systems showed similarity in the removal of obturator material and were inefficient specifically in the apical third, showing the limitation of these systems in removing obturation material from curved canals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2021.35.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:比较三种往复系统在不同热处理条件下下磨牙近中管封闭材料去除的效果。方法:用ProTaper Next 25/0.06固定18颗下磨牙的近中根管,填充杜仲胶和AHPlus。根据去除充填材料的系统将牙齿随机分为三组(n=6): Reciproc (REC R25)、Reciproc Blue (RECB R25)和Wave One Primary (WO)。当达到工作长度时,通过牙科操作显微镜观察,在器械和管壁中不再发现残留的闭孔材料,则认为去封闭完成。结果:采用Biostat 4.0软件对结果进行分析。采用显著性水平为5%的Shapiro-Wilk检验和ANOVA (Tukey)检验。使用REC、RECB和WO系统后,颈部和中部三分之一的闭孔材料体积减少(P < 0.05)。在根尖三分之一处,与操作系统无关的剩余闭孔材料没有显著减少(P> 0.05)。结论:REC、RECB和WO系统在去除闭孔材料方面表现相似,特别是在根尖三分之一处效率低下,表明这些系统在去除弯曲管的闭孔材料方面存在局限性。
Micro-computed tomography evaluation of filling material removal by three reciprocating systems with different thermal treatments
Aim: This study compared the efficacy of three reciprocating systems with different heat treatments in removing obturator material from lower molar mesial canals.
Methodology: The mesial canals of 18 lower molars were instrumented with ProTaper Next 25/0.06 and filled with gutta-percha and AHPlus. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=6) according to the system used to remove the filling material: Reciproc (REC R25), Reciproc Blue (RECB R25) and Wave One Primary (WO). The desobturation was considered complete when the working length was reached, and remnants of obturator material were no longer found in the instrument and also in the canal walls, observed through the dental operating microscope.
Results: The results were analyzed using Biostat 4.0 software. Shapiro-Wilk and ANOVA (Tukey) tests with a significance level of 5% were applied. The volume of obturator material decreased in the cervical and middle thirds after the use of REC, RECB and WO systems (P .05). In the apical third, there was no significant reduction in the remaining obturator material independent of the operating system (P>.05).
Conclusions: REC, RECB and WO systems showed similarity in the removal of obturator material and were inefficient specifically in the apical third, showing the limitation of these systems in removing obturation material from curved canals.
期刊介绍:
The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.