EXPRESS:两个渠道的故事:人工智能推荐和用户订阅渠道之间的数字广告表现

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Beibei Dong, Mengzhou Zhuang, Eric Fang, Minxue Huang
{"title":"EXPRESS:两个渠道的故事:人工智能推荐和用户订阅渠道之间的数字广告表现","authors":"Beibei Dong, Mengzhou Zhuang, Eric Fang, Minxue Huang","doi":"10.1177/00222429231190021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although in-feed advertising is popular on mainstream platforms, academic research on it is limited. Platforms typically deliver organic content through two methods: subscription by users or recommendation by artificial intelligence. However, little is known about the ad performance between these two channels. This research examines how the performance of in-feed ads, regarding click-through rate (CTR) and conversion rate (CR), differs between subscription and recommendation channels and whether these effects are mediated by ad intrusiveness and moderated by ad attributes. Two ad attributes are investigated: ad appeal (informational vs. emotional) and ad link (direct vs. indirect). Study 1 finds that the recommendation channel generates higher CTRs but lower CRs than the subscription channel, and these effects are amplified by informational ad appeal and direct ad links. Study 2 explores channel differences, revealing that the recommendation channel yields less source credibility and content control, reducing consumer engagement with organic content. Studies 3 and 4 validate the mediating role of ad intrusiveness and rule out ad recognition as an alternative explanation. Study 5 uses eye-tracking technology to show that the recommendation channel has lower content engagement, lower ad intrusiveness, and greater ad interest.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Tales of Two Channels: Digital Advertising Performance Between AI Recommendation and User Subscription Channels\",\"authors\":\"Beibei Dong, Mengzhou Zhuang, Eric Fang, Minxue Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222429231190021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although in-feed advertising is popular on mainstream platforms, academic research on it is limited. Platforms typically deliver organic content through two methods: subscription by users or recommendation by artificial intelligence. However, little is known about the ad performance between these two channels. This research examines how the performance of in-feed ads, regarding click-through rate (CTR) and conversion rate (CR), differs between subscription and recommendation channels and whether these effects are mediated by ad intrusiveness and moderated by ad attributes. Two ad attributes are investigated: ad appeal (informational vs. emotional) and ad link (direct vs. indirect). Study 1 finds that the recommendation channel generates higher CTRs but lower CRs than the subscription channel, and these effects are amplified by informational ad appeal and direct ad links. Study 2 explores channel differences, revealing that the recommendation channel yields less source credibility and content control, reducing consumer engagement with organic content. Studies 3 and 4 validate the mediating role of ad intrusiveness and rule out ad recognition as an alternative explanation. Study 5 uses eye-tracking technology to show that the recommendation channel has lower content engagement, lower ad intrusiveness, and greater ad interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231190021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231190021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然推送广告在主流平台上很受欢迎,但对它的学术研究却很有限。平台通常通过两种方式提供有机内容:用户订阅或人工智能推荐。然而,人们对这两个渠道之间的广告效果知之甚少。本研究考察了订阅渠道和推荐渠道在广告点击率(CTR)和转化率(CR)方面的表现,以及这些影响是否受到广告侵入性的调节和广告属性的调节。调查了两个广告属性:广告吸引力(信息vs.情感)和广告链接(直接vs.间接)。研究1发现,与订阅渠道相比,推荐渠道的点击率更高,但点击率更低,而这些影响被信息性广告吸引力和直接广告链接放大。研究2探讨了渠道差异,发现推荐渠道产生的来源可信度和内容控制力较差,降低了消费者对有机内容的参与度。研究3和4验证了广告侵入性的中介作用,并排除了广告识别作为另一种解释的可能性。研究5使用眼动追踪技术表明,推荐渠道具有较低的内容参与度、较低的广告侵入性和较高的广告兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: Tales of Two Channels: Digital Advertising Performance Between AI Recommendation and User Subscription Channels
Although in-feed advertising is popular on mainstream platforms, academic research on it is limited. Platforms typically deliver organic content through two methods: subscription by users or recommendation by artificial intelligence. However, little is known about the ad performance between these two channels. This research examines how the performance of in-feed ads, regarding click-through rate (CTR) and conversion rate (CR), differs between subscription and recommendation channels and whether these effects are mediated by ad intrusiveness and moderated by ad attributes. Two ad attributes are investigated: ad appeal (informational vs. emotional) and ad link (direct vs. indirect). Study 1 finds that the recommendation channel generates higher CTRs but lower CRs than the subscription channel, and these effects are amplified by informational ad appeal and direct ad links. Study 2 explores channel differences, revealing that the recommendation channel yields less source credibility and content control, reducing consumer engagement with organic content. Studies 3 and 4 validate the mediating role of ad intrusiveness and rule out ad recognition as an alternative explanation. Study 5 uses eye-tracking technology to show that the recommendation channel has lower content engagement, lower ad intrusiveness, and greater ad interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信