{"title":"不是放之四海而皆准的方法论:混合方法的调查","authors":"W. Liping, Lin Hsin-Hui","doi":"10.22606/JAER.2017.22005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Situated in a historical development of mixed methods, this paper aims to present a holistic picture of mixed methods through providing a survey of previous literature. It examines the various dimensions of mixed methods, including its definition, rationale, sampling, research designs, procedures, strengths and weaknesses, and conflicting views of using mixed methods. The paper concludes by pointing out that though mixed methods have advantages in conducting a wide range of research through capitalizing on both quantitative and qualitative methods and reducing the limitations associated with singular methods, researchers should be aware that they do not provide the best research practices and hence terminate all the debates over research methods. Researchers should never cease their efforts in seeking alternative philosophies and research methods in gaining a more complete and accurate understanding of the world, and the collaboration between the quantitative and qualitative researchers is highly recommended in this undertaking.","PeriodicalId":100751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not a One-Size-Fits-All Methodology: A Survey of Mixed Methods\",\"authors\":\"W. Liping, Lin Hsin-Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.22606/JAER.2017.22005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Situated in a historical development of mixed methods, this paper aims to present a holistic picture of mixed methods through providing a survey of previous literature. It examines the various dimensions of mixed methods, including its definition, rationale, sampling, research designs, procedures, strengths and weaknesses, and conflicting views of using mixed methods. The paper concludes by pointing out that though mixed methods have advantages in conducting a wide range of research through capitalizing on both quantitative and qualitative methods and reducing the limitations associated with singular methods, researchers should be aware that they do not provide the best research practices and hence terminate all the debates over research methods. Researchers should never cease their efforts in seeking alternative philosophies and research methods in gaining a more complete and accurate understanding of the world, and the collaboration between the quantitative and qualitative researchers is highly recommended in this undertaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22606/JAER.2017.22005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22606/JAER.2017.22005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Not a One-Size-Fits-All Methodology: A Survey of Mixed Methods
Situated in a historical development of mixed methods, this paper aims to present a holistic picture of mixed methods through providing a survey of previous literature. It examines the various dimensions of mixed methods, including its definition, rationale, sampling, research designs, procedures, strengths and weaknesses, and conflicting views of using mixed methods. The paper concludes by pointing out that though mixed methods have advantages in conducting a wide range of research through capitalizing on both quantitative and qualitative methods and reducing the limitations associated with singular methods, researchers should be aware that they do not provide the best research practices and hence terminate all the debates over research methods. Researchers should never cease their efforts in seeking alternative philosophies and research methods in gaining a more complete and accurate understanding of the world, and the collaboration between the quantitative and qualitative researchers is highly recommended in this undertaking.