信息社区在确保信息权威性方面的作用:来自NISO Plus 2022的战略

Q3 Social Sciences

Information Services and Use Pub Date : 2022-09-16 DOI:10.3233/isu-220169

Jodi Schneider, S. Blickhan, Stephanie Dawson, B. Mehmani, Nici Pfeiffer

{"title":"信息社区在确保信息权威性方面的作用:来自NISO Plus 2022的战略","authors":"Jodi Schneider, S. Blickhan, Stephanie Dawson, B. Mehmani, Nici Pfeiffer","doi":"10.3233/isu-220169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on a NISO Plus 2022 session that addressed what can be done to safeguard the integrity of the scholarly content being created, disseminated, and used. How much responsibility does the information community have in ensuring that the content we provide is authoritative? Preprints are a great way to make early research results available, but it is not always clear that those results are not yet thoroughly vetted. Peer review – a key element of scholarly publication – can help, but is far from foolproof. Retractions are another important tool, but most retracted research is still all too readily available. What can and should we be doing to safeguard the integrity of the content being created, disseminated, and used?","PeriodicalId":39698,"journal":{"name":"Information Services and Use","volume":"25 1","pages":"423-432"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of the information community in ensuring that information is authoritative: Strategies from NISO Plus 2022\",\"authors\":\"Jodi Schneider, S. Blickhan, Stephanie Dawson, B. Mehmani, Nici Pfeiffer\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/isu-220169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reports on a NISO Plus 2022 session that addressed what can be done to safeguard the integrity of the scholarly content being created, disseminated, and used. How much responsibility does the information community have in ensuring that the content we provide is authoritative? Preprints are a great way to make early research results available, but it is not always clear that those results are not yet thoroughly vetted. Peer review – a key element of scholarly publication – can help, but is far from foolproof. Retractions are another important tool, but most retracted research is still all too readily available. What can and should we be doing to safeguard the integrity of the content being created, disseminated, and used?\",\"PeriodicalId\":39698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Services and Use\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"423-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Services and Use\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-220169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Services and Use","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-220169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报道了NISO Plus 2022会议，该会议讨论了如何保护正在创建、传播和使用的学术内容的完整性。在确保我们提供的内容具有权威性方面，信息社区有多少责任?预印本是使早期研究结果可用的一个很好的方法，但并不总是清楚这些结果尚未经过彻底审查。同行评议——学术出版的一个关键因素——可以提供帮助，但远非万无一失。撤回是另一个重要的工具，但大多数撤回的研究仍然太容易获得。我们能做什么，也应该做什么来保护正在被创造、传播和使用的内容的完整性?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The role of the information community in ensuring that information is authoritative: Strategies from NISO Plus 2022

This article reports on a NISO Plus 2022 session that addressed what can be done to safeguard the integrity of the scholarly content being created, disseminated, and used. How much responsibility does the information community have in ensuring that the content we provide is authoritative? Preprints are a great way to make early research results available, but it is not always clear that those results are not yet thoroughly vetted. Peer review – a key element of scholarly publication – can help, but is far from foolproof. Retractions are another important tool, but most retracted research is still all too readily available. What can and should we be doing to safeguard the integrity of the content being created, disseminated, and used?

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Information Services and Use Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Information Services & Use is an information and information technology oriented publication with a wide scope of subject matters. International in terms of both audience and authorship, the journal aims at leaders in information management and applications in an attempt to keep them fully informed of fast-moving developments in fields such as: online systems, offline systems, electronic publishing, library automation, education and training, word processing and telecommunications. These areas are treated not only in general, but also in specific contexts; applications to business and scientific fields are sought so that a balanced view is offered to the reader.